Use of an emulated trial to investigate the association between use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonates and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1093/ije/dyae108
Karen M Tuesley, Katrina Spilsbury, Penelope M Webb, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Peter Donovan, Michael D Coory, Christopher B Steer, Louise M Stewart, Nirmala Pandeya, Melinda M Protani, Suzanne Dixon-Suen, Louise Marquart-Wilson, Susan J Jordan
{"title":"Use of an emulated trial to investigate the association between use of nitrogen-based bisphosphonates and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.","authors":"Karen M Tuesley, Katrina Spilsbury, Penelope M Webb, Sallie-Anne Pearson, Peter Donovan, Michael D Coory, Christopher B Steer, Louise M Stewart, Nirmala Pandeya, Melinda M Protani, Suzanne Dixon-Suen, Louise Marquart-Wilson, Susan J Jordan","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyae108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the eighth most common cancer in women, with poor survival outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that nitrogen-based bisphosphonate (NBB) use may be associated with reduced risk of EOC, particularly the endometrioid and serous histotypes; however, confounding by indication is a concern. An alternative approach to investigate the chemo-preventive potential of NBBs is to emulate a target trial by identifying all women who initiate use of NBBs and investigate the risk of EOC for continued users compared with discontinued users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using population-based linked data, we identified all Australian women aged over 50 years who first used NBBs over 2004-12. We used the year after first use to define treatment for each woman as either continued or discontinued use. We emulated randomization using stabilized inverse probability weights to balance the treatment groups using covariates including age, comorbidities and socioeconomic status. We followed women from treatment assignment until EOC diagnosis, death or 31 December 2013. We assessed the risk of EOC (overall and by histotype) using flexible parametric time-to-event models allowing for time-varying effects, and produced time-varying coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 313 383 women in the study, 472 were diagnosed with EOC during follow-up (261 serous EOC), with an average age at diagnosis of 72 years. Continued use of NBBs was associated with reduced risk of EOC overall (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), and serous EOC (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), compared with discontinued treatment, with estimates remaining constant over the 9-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from our emulated trial suggest that in women who initiated NBB treatment, those who continued use had 13% and 29% lower hazards of being diagnosed with EOC overall and serous EOC, respectively, compared with women who discontinued use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14147,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyae108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the eighth most common cancer in women, with poor survival outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that nitrogen-based bisphosphonate (NBB) use may be associated with reduced risk of EOC, particularly the endometrioid and serous histotypes; however, confounding by indication is a concern. An alternative approach to investigate the chemo-preventive potential of NBBs is to emulate a target trial by identifying all women who initiate use of NBBs and investigate the risk of EOC for continued users compared with discontinued users.

Methods: Using population-based linked data, we identified all Australian women aged over 50 years who first used NBBs over 2004-12. We used the year after first use to define treatment for each woman as either continued or discontinued use. We emulated randomization using stabilized inverse probability weights to balance the treatment groups using covariates including age, comorbidities and socioeconomic status. We followed women from treatment assignment until EOC diagnosis, death or 31 December 2013. We assessed the risk of EOC (overall and by histotype) using flexible parametric time-to-event models allowing for time-varying effects, and produced time-varying coefficients.

Results: Of the 313 383 women in the study, 472 were diagnosed with EOC during follow-up (261 serous EOC), with an average age at diagnosis of 72 years. Continued use of NBBs was associated with reduced risk of EOC overall (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), and serous EOC (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), compared with discontinued treatment, with estimates remaining constant over the 9-year follow-up.

Conclusions: Results from our emulated trial suggest that in women who initiated NBB treatment, those who continued use had 13% and 29% lower hazards of being diagnosed with EOC overall and serous EOC, respectively, compared with women who discontinued use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用模拟试验研究使用氮基双膦酸盐与上皮性卵巢癌风险之间的关系。
背景:上皮性卵巢癌(EOC上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)是女性第八大常见癌症,生存率很低。观察证据表明,使用氮基双膦酸盐(NBB)可能与EOC风险的降低有关,尤其是子宫内膜样组织型和浆液组织型;然而,适应症的混淆是一个令人担忧的问题。研究 NBBs 化疗预防潜力的另一种方法是模仿目标试验,识别所有开始使用 NBBs 的妇女,并调查持续使用者与停止使用者的 EOC 风险:利用基于人口的关联数据,我们确定了 2004-12 年间首次使用 NBBs 的所有 50 岁以上澳大利亚女性。我们使用首次使用后的年份将每位妇女的治疗定义为继续使用或停止使用。我们使用稳定的反概率权重来模拟随机化,利用包括年龄、合并症和社会经济状况在内的协变量来平衡治疗组。我们对妇女进行了从治疗分配到 EOC 诊断、死亡或 2013 年 12 月 31 日的随访。我们使用灵活的参数时间到事件模型评估了EOC风险(总体风险和组型风险),该模型考虑了时变效应,并得出了时变系数:在研究的 313 383 名女性中,有 472 人在随访期间确诊为 EOC(其中 261 人为浆液性 EOC),确诊时的平均年龄为 72 岁。与停止治疗相比,继续使用NBBs可降低总体EOC风险(HR = 0.87,95% CI:0.69,1.10)和浆液性EOC风险(HR = 0.71,95% CI:0.53,0.96),且在9年随访期间,估计值保持不变:我们的模拟试验结果表明,在开始接受 NBB 治疗的妇女中,与停止使用 NBB 的妇女相比,继续使用 NBB 的妇女被诊断为总体 EOC 和浆液性 EOC 的危险性分别降低了 13% 和 29%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of epidemiology
International journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Epidemiology is a vital resource for individuals seeking to stay updated on the latest advancements and emerging trends in the field of epidemiology worldwide. The journal fosters communication among researchers, educators, and practitioners involved in the study, teaching, and application of epidemiology pertaining to both communicable and non-communicable diseases. It also includes research on health services and medical care. Furthermore, the journal presents new methodologies in epidemiology and statistics, catering to professionals working in social and preventive medicine. Published six times a year, the International Journal of Epidemiology provides a comprehensive platform for the analysis of data. Overall, this journal is an indispensable tool for staying informed and connected within the dynamic realm of epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Causal diagrams for disease latency bias. Food, health, and climate change: can epidemiologists contribute further? Association of conventional cigarette smoking, heated tobacco product use and dual use with hypertension. Disentangling discordant vitamin D associations with prostate cancer incidence and fatality in a large, nested case-control study. Cohort Profile: The Pearl River Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1