History-restricted marginal structural model and latent class growth analysis of treatment trajectories for a time-dependent outcome.

IF 1.2 4区 数学 International Journal of Biostatistics Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1515/ijb-2023-0116
Awa Diop, Caroline Sirois, Jason R Guertin, Mireille E Schnitzer, James M Brophy, Claudia Blais, Denis Talbot
{"title":"History-restricted marginal structural model and latent class growth analysis of treatment trajectories for a time-dependent outcome.","authors":"Awa Diop, Caroline Sirois, Jason R Guertin, Mireille E Schnitzer, James M Brophy, Claudia Blais, Denis Talbot","doi":"10.1515/ijb-2023-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In previous work, we introduced a framework that combines latent class growth analysis (LCGA) with marginal structural models (LCGA-MSM). LCGA-MSM first summarizes the numerous time-varying treatment patterns into a few trajectory groups and then allows for a population-level causal interpretation of the group differences. However, the LCGA-MSM framework is not suitable when the outcome is time-dependent. In this study, we propose combining a nonparametric history-restricted marginal structural model (HRMSM) with LCGA. HRMSMs can be seen as an application of standard MSMs on multiple time intervals. To the best of our knowledge, we also present the first application of HRMSMs with a time-to-event outcome. It was previously noted that HRMSMs could pose interpretation problems in survival analysis when either targeting a hazard ratio or a survival curve. We propose a causal parameter that bypasses these interpretation challenges. We consider three different estimators of the parameters: inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), g-computation, and a pooled longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator (pooled LTMLE). We conduct simulation studies to measure the performance of the proposed LCGA-HRMSM. For all scenarios, we obtain unbiased estimates when using either g-computation or pooled LTMLE. IPTW produced estimates with slightly larger bias in some scenarios. Overall, all approaches have good coverage of the 95 % confidence interval. We applied our approach to a population of older Quebecers composed of 57,211 statin initiators and found that a greater adherence to statins was associated with a lower combined risk of cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":50333,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biostatistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2023-0116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In previous work, we introduced a framework that combines latent class growth analysis (LCGA) with marginal structural models (LCGA-MSM). LCGA-MSM first summarizes the numerous time-varying treatment patterns into a few trajectory groups and then allows for a population-level causal interpretation of the group differences. However, the LCGA-MSM framework is not suitable when the outcome is time-dependent. In this study, we propose combining a nonparametric history-restricted marginal structural model (HRMSM) with LCGA. HRMSMs can be seen as an application of standard MSMs on multiple time intervals. To the best of our knowledge, we also present the first application of HRMSMs with a time-to-event outcome. It was previously noted that HRMSMs could pose interpretation problems in survival analysis when either targeting a hazard ratio or a survival curve. We propose a causal parameter that bypasses these interpretation challenges. We consider three different estimators of the parameters: inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), g-computation, and a pooled longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator (pooled LTMLE). We conduct simulation studies to measure the performance of the proposed LCGA-HRMSM. For all scenarios, we obtain unbiased estimates when using either g-computation or pooled LTMLE. IPTW produced estimates with slightly larger bias in some scenarios. Overall, all approaches have good coverage of the 95 % confidence interval. We applied our approach to a population of older Quebecers composed of 57,211 statin initiators and found that a greater adherence to statins was associated with a lower combined risk of cardiovascular disease or all-cause mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对随时间变化的结果,对治疗轨迹进行历史限制边际结构模型和潜类增长分析。
在之前的工作中,我们提出了一种将潜类增长分析(LCGA)与边际结构模型(LCGA-MSM)相结合的框架。LCGA-MSM 首先将众多随时间变化的治疗模式归纳为几个轨迹组,然后对组间差异进行群体层面的因果解释。然而,LCGA-MSM 框架并不适合结果随时间变化的情况。在本研究中,我们建议将非参数历史限制边际结构模型(HRMSM)与 LCGA 结合起来。HRMSM 可以看作是标准 MSM 在多个时间区间上的应用。据我们所知,我们还首次将 HRMSMs 应用于时间到事件结果。以前曾有人指出,当以危险比或生存曲线为目标时,HRMSMs 可能会在生存分析中带来解释问题。我们提出的因果参数可以绕过这些解释难题。我们考虑了三种不同的参数估计方法:逆治疗概率加权法(IPTW)、g 计算法和集合纵向目标最大似然估计法(pooled LTMLE)。我们进行了模拟研究,以衡量所提出的 LCGA-HRMSM 的性能。在所有情况下,无论是使用 g 计算还是集合 LTMLE,我们都能获得无偏估计值。在某些情况下,IPTW 得出的估计值偏差稍大。总体而言,所有方法都能很好地覆盖 95% 的置信区间。我们将这一方法应用于由 57,211 名他汀类药物服用者组成的魁北克老年人群,发现他汀类药物服用依从性越高,心血管疾病或全因死亡的综合风险越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biostatistics
International Journal of Biostatistics Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Biostatistics (IJB) seeks to publish new biostatistical models and methods, new statistical theory, as well as original applications of statistical methods, for important practical problems arising from the biological, medical, public health, and agricultural sciences with an emphasis on semiparametric methods. Given many alternatives to publish exist within biostatistics, IJB offers a place to publish for research in biostatistics focusing on modern methods, often based on machine-learning and other data-adaptive methodologies, as well as providing a unique reading experience that compels the author to be explicit about the statistical inference problem addressed by the paper. IJB is intended that the journal cover the entire range of biostatistics, from theoretical advances to relevant and sensible translations of a practical problem into a statistical framework. Electronic publication also allows for data and software code to be appended, and opens the door for reproducible research allowing readers to easily replicate analyses described in a paper. Both original research and review articles will be warmly received, as will articles applying sound statistical methods to practical problems.
期刊最新文献
Hypothesis testing for detecting outlier evaluators. Optimizing personalized treatments for targeted patient populations across multiple domains. History-restricted marginal structural model and latent class growth analysis of treatment trajectories for a time-dependent outcome. Hybrid classical-Bayesian approach to sample size determination for two-arm superiority clinical trials. An interpretable cluster-based logistic regression model, with application to the characterization of response to therapy in severe eosinophilic asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1