The impact of telehealth cost-sharing on healthcare utilization: Evidence from high-deductible health plans.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14343
Risha Gidwani, Veronica Yank, Lane Burgette, Aaron Kofner, Steven M Asch, Zachary Wagner
{"title":"The impact of telehealth cost-sharing on healthcare utilization: Evidence from high-deductible health plans.","authors":"Risha Gidwani, Veronica Yank, Lane Burgette, Aaron Kofner, Steven M Asch, Zachary Wagner","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate whether cost-sharing decreases led high-deductible health plans (HDHP) enrollees to increase their use of healthcare.</p><p><strong>Data sources, study setting: </strong>National sample of chronically-ill patients age 18-64 from 2018 to 2020 (n = 1,318,178).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Difference-in-differences analyses using entropy-balancing weights were used to evaluate the effect of a policy shift to $0 cost-sharing for telehealth on utilization for HDHP compared with non-HDHP enrollees. Due to this shock, HDHP enrollees experienced substantial declines in cost-sharing for telehealth, while non-HDHP enrollees experienced small declines. Event study models were also used to evaluate changes over time.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction methods: </strong>Outcomes included use of any outpatient care; use of $0 telehealth; use of $0 telehealth as a proportion of all outpatient care; and use of any telehealth. To test whether any differences were due to preferences for care modality versus cost-sharing, we further evaluated use of non-$0 telehealth as a placebo test.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>There was no difference in change in overall outpatient visits (p = 0.84), with chronicall-ill HDHP enrollees using less care both before and after the policy shift. However, compared with non-HDHP enrollees, HDHP enrollees increased their use of $0 telehealth by 0.08 visits over a 9-month period, a 27% increase (95% CI 0.07-0.09, p < 0.001) and shifted 1.2 percentage points more of their care to $0 telehealth, a 15% increase (ß = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01, 0.01, p < 0.001). However, HDHP enrollees had lower uptake of non-$0 telehealth than non-HDHP enrollees (ß = -0.01, 95%CI -0.02, 0.00, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent-but-expiring federal legislation exempts telehealth from HDHP deductibles for care provided in 2023 and 2024. Our results indicate that extending the protections provided by this legislation could help reduce the gap in access to care for chronically-ill persons enrolled in HDHPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate whether cost-sharing decreases led high-deductible health plans (HDHP) enrollees to increase their use of healthcare.

Data sources, study setting: National sample of chronically-ill patients age 18-64 from 2018 to 2020 (n = 1,318,178).

Study design: Difference-in-differences analyses using entropy-balancing weights were used to evaluate the effect of a policy shift to $0 cost-sharing for telehealth on utilization for HDHP compared with non-HDHP enrollees. Due to this shock, HDHP enrollees experienced substantial declines in cost-sharing for telehealth, while non-HDHP enrollees experienced small declines. Event study models were also used to evaluate changes over time.

Data collection/extraction methods: Outcomes included use of any outpatient care; use of $0 telehealth; use of $0 telehealth as a proportion of all outpatient care; and use of any telehealth. To test whether any differences were due to preferences for care modality versus cost-sharing, we further evaluated use of non-$0 telehealth as a placebo test.

Principal findings: There was no difference in change in overall outpatient visits (p = 0.84), with chronicall-ill HDHP enrollees using less care both before and after the policy shift. However, compared with non-HDHP enrollees, HDHP enrollees increased their use of $0 telehealth by 0.08 visits over a 9-month period, a 27% increase (95% CI 0.07-0.09, p < 0.001) and shifted 1.2 percentage points more of their care to $0 telehealth, a 15% increase (ß = 0.01, 95% CI 0.01, 0.01, p < 0.001). However, HDHP enrollees had lower uptake of non-$0 telehealth than non-HDHP enrollees (ß = -0.01, 95%CI -0.02, 0.00, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Recent-but-expiring federal legislation exempts telehealth from HDHP deductibles for care provided in 2023 and 2024. Our results indicate that extending the protections provided by this legislation could help reduce the gap in access to care for chronically-ill persons enrolled in HDHPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗费用分摊对医疗保健利用率的影响:来自高免赔额医疗计划的证据。
目标:评估费用分摊的减少是否会导致高自付额医疗计划(HDHP)参保者增加医疗保健的使用:评估费用分担的减少是否会导致高免赔额医疗计划(HDHP)参保者增加医疗保健的使用:研究设计:研究设计:使用熵平衡权重进行差异分析,以评估与非 HDHP 参保者相比,远程医疗费用分摊为 0 美元的政策转变对 HDHP 利用率的影响。由于这一冲击,HDHP 参保者的远程保健费用分摊额大幅下降,而非 HDHP 参保者的下降幅度较小。数据收集/提取方法:结果包括使用任何门诊护理;使用 0 美元远程保健;使用 0 美元远程保健占所有门诊护理的比例;以及使用任何远程保健。为了检验是否存在因偏好护理方式而非费用分担导致的差异,我们进一步评估了非 0 美元远程保健的使用情况,作为安慰剂试验:总体门诊就诊人次的变化没有差异(p = 0.84),长期慢性病的 HDHP 参保者在政策转变前后使用的护理服务都较少。然而,与非 HDHP 参保者相比,HDHP 参保者在 9 个月内增加了 0.08 美元的远程医疗,增幅为 27%(95% CI 0.07-0.09,p 结论):最近出台但即将到期的联邦法律规定,在 2023 年和 2024 年提供的医疗服务中,远程医疗免去了 HDHP 的免赔额。我们的研究结果表明,扩大该立法提供的保护范围有助于缩小加入 HDHP 的慢性病患者在获得医疗服务方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating a predictive model of avoidable hospital events for race- and sex-based bias. Addressing social and health needs in health care: Characterizing case managers' work to address patient-defined goals. Changes in healthcare costs and utilization for Medicaid recipients who received supportive housing through a payer-community-based housing partnership. Exploring the health impacts of climate change: Challenges and considerations for health services research. Commercial insurers' market power and hospital prices in Medicaid managed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1