Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057
S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh, K Harries, W G Lewis, R J Egan
{"title":"Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh, K Harries, W G Lewis, R J Egan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) on outcomes of high-volume low-complexity (HVLC) general surgery procedures and to determine critical values for BMI when selecting patients into HVLC programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of studies looking at patients in different BMI categories undergoing HVLC general surgery procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair and umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair), in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes using random-effects modelling. The QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis Studies) tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system were used to assess bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 studies including 486,392 patients were examined. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, BMI ≥40 was associated with higher conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, <i>p</i>=0.040) but did not affect complications (OR: 0.69, <i>p</i>=0.400) or length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: -0.01 days, <i>p</i>=0.900). In inguinal hernia repair, BMI ≥35 was associated with longer operative time (MD: 18.00 minutes, <i>p</i><0.00001), and higher risk of wound complications (OR: 3.01, <i>p</i><0.00001) and hospital readmission (OR: 1.46, <i>p</i>=0.0008). In umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair, BMI ≥30 was associated with higher risk of wound complications (OR: 6.45, <i>p</i><0.0001) and hospital readmission (OR: 5.56, <i>p</i><0.00001), and longer operative time (MD: 4.01 minutes, <i>p</i>=0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obesity was associated with longer operative time (up to 23 minutes) and higher risk of postoperative morbidity (up to 4-fold) in HVLC procedures. BMI <40 (moderate GRADE certainty - laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and BMI <35 (moderate GRADE certainty - inguinal hernia) appear to represent optimal critical values for perioperative safety metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) on outcomes of high-volume low-complexity (HVLC) general surgery procedures and to determine critical values for BMI when selecting patients into HVLC programmes.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of studies looking at patients in different BMI categories undergoing HVLC general surgery procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair and umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair), in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes using random-effects modelling. The QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis Studies) tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system were used to assess bias.

Results: A total of 26 studies including 486,392 patients were examined. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, BMI ≥40 was associated with higher conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, p=0.040) but did not affect complications (OR: 0.69, p=0.400) or length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: -0.01 days, p=0.900). In inguinal hernia repair, BMI ≥35 was associated with longer operative time (MD: 18.00 minutes, p<0.00001), and higher risk of wound complications (OR: 3.01, p<0.00001) and hospital readmission (OR: 1.46, p=0.0008). In umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair, BMI ≥30 was associated with higher risk of wound complications (OR: 6.45, p<0.0001) and hospital readmission (OR: 5.56, p<0.00001), and longer operative time (MD: 4.01 minutes, p=0.030).

Conclusions: Obesity was associated with longer operative time (up to 23 minutes) and higher risk of postoperative morbidity (up to 4-fold) in HVLC procedures. BMI <40 (moderate GRADE certainty - laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and BMI <35 (moderate GRADE certainty - inguinal hernia) appear to represent optimal critical values for perioperative safety metrics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与大容量低复杂性普通外科发病率相关的体重指数临界值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介本研究旨在调查体重指数(BMI,kg/m2)对高容量低复杂性(HVLC)普外科手术结果的影响,并确定在选择患者进入HVLC计划时BMI的临界值:根据PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,对接受HVLC普外科手术(腹腔镜胆囊切除术、腹股沟疝修补术、脐或脐旁疝修补术)的不同BMI类别患者的研究进行了系统综述。利用随机效应模型构建了一个比较荟萃分析模型,以比较结果。采用QUIPS(预后研究质量)工具和GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)系统评估偏倚:结果:共研究了26项研究,包括486 392名患者。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,BMI≥40与较高的开腹手术转换率相关(几率比[OR]:1.33,P=0.040),但不影响并发症(OR:0.69,P=0.400)或住院时间(平均差[MD]:-0.01天,P=0.900)。在腹股沟疝修补术中,体重指数≥35 与手术时间延长有关(MD:18.00 分钟,PPP=0.0008)。在脐疝或脐旁疝修补术中,体重指数≥30与较高的伤口并发症风险有关(OR:6.45,ppp=0.030):在 HVLC 手术中,肥胖与较长的手术时间(长达 23 分钟)和较高的术后发病风险(高达 4 倍)有关。体重指数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
期刊最新文献
A novel adaption to suction-assisted seroma aspiration. Changes in hip and knee arthroplasty practice post-COVID-19 in the English NHS: a retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics data. Frailty and body composition predict adverse outcomes after emergency general surgery admission: a multicentre observational cohort study. The risk of revision surgery after trainee-led primary total hip replacement. A case report and systematic review of periorbital emphysema following nose blowing or sneezing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1