An ensemble machine learning-based approach to predict cervical cancer using hybrid feature selection

Khandaker Mohammad Mohi Uddin , Abdullah Al Mamun , Anamika Chakrabarti , Rafid Mostafiz , Samrat Kumar Dey
{"title":"An ensemble machine learning-based approach to predict cervical cancer using hybrid feature selection","authors":"Khandaker Mohammad Mohi Uddin ,&nbsp;Abdullah Al Mamun ,&nbsp;Anamika Chakrabarti ,&nbsp;Rafid Mostafiz ,&nbsp;Samrat Kumar Dey","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2024.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cervical cancer has recently emerged as the leading cause of premature death among women. Around 85% of cervical cancer cases occur in underdeveloped countries. There are several risk factors associated with cervical cancer. This study describes a novel predictive model that uses early screening and risk trends from individual health records to forecast cervical cancer patients' prognoses. This study uses machine learning classification techniques to investigate the risk factors for cervical cancer. Additionally, use the voting method to evaluate all models and select the most appropriate model. The dataset used in this study contains missing values and shows a significant imbalance. Thus, the Random Oversampling technique was used as a sampling method. We used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and XGBoost feature selection techniques to determine the most important features. To predict the accuracy, we used several machine learning classifiers, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), k-nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), AdaBoost (AdB), Gradient Boosting (GB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Nearest Centroid Classifier (NCC). To demonstrate the efficacy of the suggested model, a comparison of its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity was performed. We used the Random Oversampling approach along with the Ensemble ML method, hard voting on RF and MLP, and achieved 99.19% accuracy. It is demonstrated that the ensemble ML classifier (hard voting) performs better at handling classification problems when features are decreased and the high-class imbalance problem is handled.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528624000141/pdfft?md5=d40278a84049b884c55e84f0cfc57216&pid=1-s2.0-S2772528624000141-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528624000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cervical cancer has recently emerged as the leading cause of premature death among women. Around 85% of cervical cancer cases occur in underdeveloped countries. There are several risk factors associated with cervical cancer. This study describes a novel predictive model that uses early screening and risk trends from individual health records to forecast cervical cancer patients' prognoses. This study uses machine learning classification techniques to investigate the risk factors for cervical cancer. Additionally, use the voting method to evaluate all models and select the most appropriate model. The dataset used in this study contains missing values and shows a significant imbalance. Thus, the Random Oversampling technique was used as a sampling method. We used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and XGBoost feature selection techniques to determine the most important features. To predict the accuracy, we used several machine learning classifiers, including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), k-nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), AdaBoost (AdB), Gradient Boosting (GB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Nearest Centroid Classifier (NCC). To demonstrate the efficacy of the suggested model, a comparison of its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity was performed. We used the Random Oversampling approach along with the Ensemble ML method, hard voting on RF and MLP, and achieved 99.19% accuracy. It is demonstrated that the ensemble ML classifier (hard voting) performs better at handling classification problems when features are decreased and the high-class imbalance problem is handled.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用混合特征选择预测宫颈癌的基于机器学习的集合方法
宫颈癌最近已成为妇女过早死亡的主要原因。大约 85% 的宫颈癌病例发生在不发达国家。宫颈癌与多种风险因素有关。本研究介绍了一种新型预测模型,该模型利用个人健康记录中的早期筛查和风险趋势来预测宫颈癌患者的预后。本研究使用机器学习分类技术来研究宫颈癌的风险因素。此外,还使用投票法评估所有模型,并选择最合适的模型。本研究使用的数据集包含缺失值,并显示出明显的不平衡。因此,我们采用了随机过度抽样技术作为抽样方法。我们使用主成分分析(PCA)和 XGBoost 特征选择技术来确定最重要的特征。为了预测准确率,我们使用了多种机器学习分类器,包括支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、k-近邻(KNN)、决策树(DT)、奈夫贝叶斯(NB)、逻辑回归(LR)、AdaBoost(AdB)、梯度提升(GB)、多层感知器(MLP)和最近中心点分类器(NCC)。为了证明所建议模型的有效性,我们对其准确性、灵敏度和特异性进行了比较。我们使用了随机过采样方法和集合 ML 方法,对 RF 和 MLP 进行了硬投票,并取得了 99.19% 的准确率。结果表明,当特征减少并处理高类不平衡问题时,集合 ML 分类器(硬投票)在处理分类问题上表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in neurodegenerative diseases Topic modeling of neuropsychiatric diseases related to gut microbiota and gut brain axis using artificial intelligence based BERTopic model on PubMed abstracts Brain network analysis in Parkinson's disease patients based on graph theory Exploring age-related functional brain changes during audio-visual integration tasks in early to mid-adulthood Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1