Considerable differences in management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with biliary atresia.

JPGN reports Pub Date : 2024-04-04 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/jpr3.12068
Ulrika Liliemark, Afrodite Psaros Einberg, Jan F Svensson, Björn Fischler
{"title":"Considerable differences in management of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with biliary atresia.","authors":"Ulrika Liliemark, Afrodite Psaros Einberg, Jan F Svensson, Björn Fischler","doi":"10.1002/jpr3.12068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with biliary atresia (BA) and ongoing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection may have poorer outcomes after Kasai portoenterostomy than uninfected patients. Still, there is no consensus on the usefulness of viral testing and antiviral treatment (AVT). This study aims to explore the need for future research on AVT for CMV infection by assessing how CMV infection in BA patients is managed in different centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online questionnaire with 10 questions was offered to participants at an international congress on BA, organized in collaboration with the European Reference Network for rare liver diseases in 2022. Answers to questions were either dichotomic or multiple choices of different numeric intervals. Ongoing CMV infection was defined by detecting cytomegalovirus-immunoglobulin M (CMV-IgM) in serum or cytomegalovirus-deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV-DNA) by polymerase chain reaction in blood or urine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 43 respondents from 36 centers in 26 countries. The total number of BA patients per year was between 208 and 380 from centers with 0-5 to >20 BA patients yearly (median 6-10). CMV infection was tested in 27 centers (75%), of which 18 (67%) use AVT. The rate of CMV infection varied between 0%-5% and 40%-50% (median 5%-10%). Willingness to treat the infection did not differ between centers with low and high rates of CMV infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most centers test for CMV infection, and a considerable proportion use AVT despite the lack of evidence of its benefits. A future randomized study on treating CMV infection in BA patients is necessary and feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":501015,"journal":{"name":"JPGN reports","volume":"5 3","pages":"303-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPGN reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpr3.12068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with biliary atresia (BA) and ongoing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection may have poorer outcomes after Kasai portoenterostomy than uninfected patients. Still, there is no consensus on the usefulness of viral testing and antiviral treatment (AVT). This study aims to explore the need for future research on AVT for CMV infection by assessing how CMV infection in BA patients is managed in different centers.

Methods: An online questionnaire with 10 questions was offered to participants at an international congress on BA, organized in collaboration with the European Reference Network for rare liver diseases in 2022. Answers to questions were either dichotomic or multiple choices of different numeric intervals. Ongoing CMV infection was defined by detecting cytomegalovirus-immunoglobulin M (CMV-IgM) in serum or cytomegalovirus-deoxyribonucleic acid (CMV-DNA) by polymerase chain reaction in blood or urine.

Results: There were 43 respondents from 36 centers in 26 countries. The total number of BA patients per year was between 208 and 380 from centers with 0-5 to >20 BA patients yearly (median 6-10). CMV infection was tested in 27 centers (75%), of which 18 (67%) use AVT. The rate of CMV infection varied between 0%-5% and 40%-50% (median 5%-10%). Willingness to treat the infection did not differ between centers with low and high rates of CMV infection.

Conclusions: Most centers test for CMV infection, and a considerable proportion use AVT despite the lack of evidence of its benefits. A future randomized study on treating CMV infection in BA patients is necessary and feasible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对胆道闭锁患者巨细胞病毒感染的管理存在巨大差异。
目的:胆道闭锁(BA)和巨细胞病毒(CMV)持续感染的患者在接受卡萨伊造口术后的预后可能会比未感染的患者差。然而,关于病毒检测和抗病毒治疗(AVT)的实用性还没有达成共识。本研究旨在通过评估不同中心对 BA 患者 CMV 感染的处理方式,探讨未来研究 CMV 感染 AVT 的必要性:在2022年与欧洲罕见肝病参考网络(European Reference Network for 罕见肝病)合作举办的BA国际大会上,向与会者提供了一份包含10个问题的在线问卷。对问题的回答可以是二分法,也可以是不同数字区间的多选法。血清中检测到巨细胞病毒免疫球蛋白 M(CMV-IgM)或血液或尿液中聚合酶链反应检测到巨细胞病毒脱氧核糖核酸(CMV-DNA)即为巨细胞病毒感染:共有来自 26 个国家 36 个中心的 43 位受访者。每年 BA 患者的总人数在 208 至 380 人之间,这些中心每年的 BA 患者人数从 0-5 人到超过 20 人不等(中位数为 6-10 人)。有 27 个中心(75%)检测了 CMV 感染,其中 18 个中心(67%)使用 AVT。CMV 感染率介于 0%-5% 和 40%-50% 之间(中位数为 5%-10%)。CMV感染率低的中心和感染率高的中心在治疗意愿上没有差异:结论:大多数中心都会检测 CMV 感染,尽管缺乏证据证明 AVT 的益处,但仍有相当一部分中心使用 AVT。未来对治疗 BA 患者的 CMV 感染进行随机研究是必要且可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long‐term implications of a multidisciplinary tube‐weaning program: Parental perspectives The first paediatric living donor auxiliary orthotopic liver transplant for dengue acute liver failure Anterior abdominal wall defects and their management outcomes in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, neonatal intensive care unit Eosinophilic myenteric ganglionitis: A case in a 14‐year‐old‐male Thirty‐two‐month‐old with multiple duodenal webs diagnosed after failed gastrojejunostomy exchange successfully treated with combination endoscopic therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1