The utility of Multicentre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm in identifying epileptic activity and predicting seizure freedom in MRI lesion-negative paediatric patients

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107429
Aimee Goel, Stefano Seri, Shakti Agrawal, Ratna Kumar, Annapurna Sudarsanam, Bryony Carr, Andrew Lawley, Lesley Macpherson, Adam J. Oates, Helen Williams, A. Richard Walsh, William B. Lo, Joshua Pepper
{"title":"The utility of Multicentre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm in identifying epileptic activity and predicting seizure freedom in MRI lesion-negative paediatric patients","authors":"Aimee Goel,&nbsp;Stefano Seri,&nbsp;Shakti Agrawal,&nbsp;Ratna Kumar,&nbsp;Annapurna Sudarsanam,&nbsp;Bryony Carr,&nbsp;Andrew Lawley,&nbsp;Lesley Macpherson,&nbsp;Adam J. Oates,&nbsp;Helen Williams,&nbsp;A. Richard Walsh,&nbsp;William B. Lo,&nbsp;Joshua Pepper","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Paediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) who have no clear focal lesion identified on conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are a particularly challenging cohort to treat and form an increasing part of epilepsy surgery programs. A recently developed deep-learning-based MRI lesion detection algorithm, the Multicentre Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm, has been shown to aid detection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). We applied this algorithm retrospectively to a cohort of MRI-negative children with refractory focal epilepsy who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to determine its accuracy in identifying unseen epileptic lesions, seizure onset zones and clinical outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively applied the MELD algorithm to a consecutive series of MRI-negative patients who underwent SEEG at our tertiary Paediatric Epilepsy Surgery centre. We assessed the extent to which the identified MELD cluster or lesion area corresponded with the clinical seizure hypothesis, the epileptic network, and the positron emission tomography (PET) focal hypometabolic area. In those who underwent resective surgery, we analysed whether the region of MELD abnormality corresponded with the surgical target and to what extent this was associated with seizure freedom.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 37 SEEG studies in 28 MRI-negative children in whom we could run the MELD algorithm. Of these, 14 (50 %) children had clusters identified on MELD. Nine (32 %) children had clusters concordant with seizure hypothesis, 6 (21 %) had clusters concordant with PET imaging, and 5 (18 %) children had at least one cluster concordant with SEEG electrode placement. Overall, 4 MELD clusters in 4 separate children correctly predicted either seizure onset zone or irritative zone based on SEEG stimulation data. Sixteen children (57 %) went on to have resective or lesional surgery. Of these, only one patient (4 %) had a MELD cluster which co-localised with the resection cavity and this child had an Engel 1 A outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our paediatric cohort of MRI-negative patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the MELD algorithm identified abnormal clusters or lesions in half of cases, and identified one radiologically occult focal cortical dysplasia. Machine-learning-based lesion detection is a promising area of research with the potential to improve seizure outcomes in this challenging cohort of radiologically occult FCD cases. However, its application should be approached with caution, especially with regards to its specificity in detecting FCD lesions, and there is still work to be done before it adds to diagnostic utility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092012112400144X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Paediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) who have no clear focal lesion identified on conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are a particularly challenging cohort to treat and form an increasing part of epilepsy surgery programs. A recently developed deep-learning-based MRI lesion detection algorithm, the Multicentre Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm, has been shown to aid detection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). We applied this algorithm retrospectively to a cohort of MRI-negative children with refractory focal epilepsy who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to determine its accuracy in identifying unseen epileptic lesions, seizure onset zones and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively applied the MELD algorithm to a consecutive series of MRI-negative patients who underwent SEEG at our tertiary Paediatric Epilepsy Surgery centre. We assessed the extent to which the identified MELD cluster or lesion area corresponded with the clinical seizure hypothesis, the epileptic network, and the positron emission tomography (PET) focal hypometabolic area. In those who underwent resective surgery, we analysed whether the region of MELD abnormality corresponded with the surgical target and to what extent this was associated with seizure freedom.

Results

We identified 37 SEEG studies in 28 MRI-negative children in whom we could run the MELD algorithm. Of these, 14 (50 %) children had clusters identified on MELD. Nine (32 %) children had clusters concordant with seizure hypothesis, 6 (21 %) had clusters concordant with PET imaging, and 5 (18 %) children had at least one cluster concordant with SEEG electrode placement. Overall, 4 MELD clusters in 4 separate children correctly predicted either seizure onset zone or irritative zone based on SEEG stimulation data. Sixteen children (57 %) went on to have resective or lesional surgery. Of these, only one patient (4 %) had a MELD cluster which co-localised with the resection cavity and this child had an Engel 1 A outcome.

Conclusions

In our paediatric cohort of MRI-negative patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the MELD algorithm identified abnormal clusters or lesions in half of cases, and identified one radiologically occult focal cortical dysplasia. Machine-learning-based lesion detection is a promising area of research with the potential to improve seizure outcomes in this challenging cohort of radiologically occult FCD cases. However, its application should be approached with caution, especially with regards to its specificity in detecting FCD lesions, and there is still work to be done before it adds to diagnostic utility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心癫痫病灶检测 (MELD) 算法在磁共振成像病灶阴性儿科患者中识别癫痫活动和预测癫痫发作自由度的实用性
目的在传统结构磁共振成像(MRI)中未发现明确病灶的耐药局灶性癫痫(DRFE)儿科患者是一个特别具有挑战性的治疗群体,在癫痫手术项目中的比例越来越高。最近开发的一种基于深度学习的磁共振成像病灶检测算法--多中心病灶检测(MELD)算法,已被证明有助于检测局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD)。我们对接受立体脑电图(SEEG)检查的MRI阴性难治性局灶性癫痫患儿进行了回顾性研究,以确定该算法在识别未见癫痫病灶、癫痫发作起始区和临床预后方面的准确性。我们评估了已确定的 MELD 集群或病变区域与临床癫痫发作假说、癫痫网络和正电子发射断层扫描(PET)局灶低代谢区的对应程度。在接受切除手术的患儿中,我们分析了 MELD 异常区域是否与手术目标相对应,以及这在多大程度上与癫痫发作自由度相关。其中,14 名(50%)患儿在 MELD 算法中发现了癫痫簇。9名(32%)患儿的集群与癫痫发作假设一致,6名(21%)患儿的集群与 PET 成像一致,5 名(18%)患儿的至少一个集群与 SEEG 电极位置一致。总体而言,根据 SEEG 刺激数据,4 名儿童的 4 个 MELD 组群正确预测了癫痫发作起始区或刺激区。16名儿童(57%)接受了切除或病变手术。结论 在我们的儿科队列中,对于核磁共振成像阴性的耐药局灶性癫痫患者,MELD 算法识别出了半数病例中的异常病灶,并识别出了一个放射学上隐匿的局灶性皮质发育不良。基于机器学习的病灶检测是一个前景广阔的研究领域,有望改善这一具有挑战性的放射学隐匿性 FCD 病例群的癫痫发作预后。然而,在应用机器学习时应谨慎从事,尤其是在检测 FCD 病变的特异性方面,而且在提高诊断效用方面仍有许多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1