Upgrading of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer at Prostatectomy: Germline Risk Factors in a Prospective Cohort.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0326
Michael A Liss, Nicole Zeltser, Yingye Zheng, Camden Lopez, Menghan Liu, Yash Patel, Takafumi N Yamaguchi, Stefan E Eng, Mao Tian, Oliver J Semmes, Daniel W Lin, James D Brooks, John T Wei, Eric A Klein, Ashutosh K Tewari, Juan Miguel Mosquera, Francesca Khani, Brian D Robinson, Muhammad Aasad, Dean A Troyer, Jacob Kagan, Martin G Sanda, Ian M Thompson, Paul C Boutros, Robin J Leach
{"title":"Upgrading of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer at Prostatectomy: Germline Risk Factors in a Prospective Cohort.","authors":"Michael A Liss, Nicole Zeltser, Yingye Zheng, Camden Lopez, Menghan Liu, Yash Patel, Takafumi N Yamaguchi, Stefan E Eng, Mao Tian, Oliver J Semmes, Daniel W Lin, James D Brooks, John T Wei, Eric A Klein, Ashutosh K Tewari, Juan Miguel Mosquera, Francesca Khani, Brian D Robinson, Muhammad Aasad, Dean A Troyer, Jacob Kagan, Martin G Sanda, Ian M Thompson, Paul C Boutros, Robin J Leach","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Localized prostate tumors show significant spatial heterogeneity, with regions of high-grade disease adjacent to lower grade disease. Consequently, prostate cancer biopsies are prone to sampling bias, potentially leading to underestimation of tumor grade. To study the clinical, epidemiologic, and molecular hallmarks of this phenomenon, we conducted a prospective study of grade upgrading: differences in detected prostate cancer grade between biopsy and surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a prospective, multi-institutional cohort of men with grade group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer on biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy. Upgrading was defined as detection of GG2+ in the resected tumor. Germline DNA from 192 subjects was subjected to whole-genome sequencing to quantify ancestry, pathogenic variants in DNA damage response genes, and polygenic risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 285 men, 67% upgraded at surgery. PSA density and percent of cancer in pre-prostatectomy positive biopsy cores were significantly associated with upgrading. No assessed genetic risk factor was predictive of upgrading, including polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a cohort of patients with low-grade prostate cancer, a majority upgraded at radical prostatectomy. PSA density and percent of cancer in pre-prostatectomy positive biopsy cores portended the presence of higher-grade disease, while germline genetics was not informative in this setting. Patients with low-risk prostate cancer, but elevated PSA density or percent cancer in positive biopsy cores, may benefit from repeat biopsy, additional imaging or other approaches to complement active surveillance.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Further risk stratification of patients with low-risk prostate cancer may provide useful context for active surveillance decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1500-1511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Localized prostate tumors show significant spatial heterogeneity, with regions of high-grade disease adjacent to lower grade disease. Consequently, prostate cancer biopsies are prone to sampling bias, potentially leading to underestimation of tumor grade. To study the clinical, epidemiologic, and molecular hallmarks of this phenomenon, we conducted a prospective study of grade upgrading: differences in detected prostate cancer grade between biopsy and surgery.

Methods: We established a prospective, multi-institutional cohort of men with grade group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer on biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy. Upgrading was defined as detection of GG2+ in the resected tumor. Germline DNA from 192 subjects was subjected to whole-genome sequencing to quantify ancestry, pathogenic variants in DNA damage response genes, and polygenic risk.

Results: Of 285 men, 67% upgraded at surgery. PSA density and percent of cancer in pre-prostatectomy positive biopsy cores were significantly associated with upgrading. No assessed genetic risk factor was predictive of upgrading, including polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with low-grade prostate cancer, a majority upgraded at radical prostatectomy. PSA density and percent of cancer in pre-prostatectomy positive biopsy cores portended the presence of higher-grade disease, while germline genetics was not informative in this setting. Patients with low-risk prostate cancer, but elevated PSA density or percent cancer in positive biopsy cores, may benefit from repeat biopsy, additional imaging or other approaches to complement active surveillance.

Impact: Further risk stratification of patients with low-risk prostate cancer may provide useful context for active surveillance decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺切除术中1级前列腺癌的升级:前瞻性队列中的基因风险因素
背景:局部前列腺肿瘤显示出明显的空间异质性,高级别疾病区域与低级别疾病区域相邻。因此,前列腺癌活检容易出现取样偏差,可能导致肿瘤分级被低估。为了研究这种现象的临床、流行病学和分子特征,我们开展了一项关于分级升级的前瞻性研究:活检与手术之间检测到的前列腺癌分级差异:我们建立了一个前瞻性的多机构队列,对象是活检发现 1 级(GG1)前列腺癌并接受根治性前列腺切除术的男性。在切除的肿瘤中发现 GG2+ 即为升级。对192名受试者的种系DNA进行了全基因组测序,以量化血统、DNA损伤反应基因中的致病变异和多基因风险:285名男性中,67%在手术时升级。PSA密度和前列腺切除术前阳性活检核心中癌症的百分比与升级有显著相关性。包括前列腺癌诊断的多基因风险评分在内,没有任何评估的遗传风险因素可预测手术升级:结论:在一组低分化前列腺癌患者中,大多数人在根治性前列腺切除术后病情有所改善。PSA密度和前列腺切除术前阳性活检核心中癌症的百分比预示着存在更高级别疾病,而种系遗传学在这种情况下并不具有参考价值。低风险前列腺癌患者,如果PSA密度或活检阳性核芯中的癌症比例升高,可能会受益于重复活检、额外的影像学检查或其他辅助积极监测的方法:影响:对低风险前列腺癌患者进行进一步的风险分层可为主动监测决策提供有用的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Adverse birth and obstetric outcomes in the offspring of male adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A nationwide population-based study. Incidence of serious complications following screening colonoscopy in adults aged 76 to 85 years old. Patterns of subsequent cancer incidence over time in patients with breast cancer. Polygenic risk score, healthy lifestyle score, and colorectal cancer risk: a prospective cohort study. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ontario, Canada: A decomposition analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1