Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in US Anesthesiology Residency Matching.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007102
Alexander N Sumarli, Lauren S Pineda, Alexandra Vacaru, Emily Novak, Zachary Brandt, Edgardo E Reynoso, Richard L Applegate, Melissa D McCabe
{"title":"Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in US Anesthesiology Residency Matching.","authors":"Alexander N Sumarli, Lauren S Pineda, Alexandra Vacaru, Emily Novak, Zachary Brandt, Edgardo E Reynoso, Richard L Applegate, Melissa D McCabe","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient outcomes are improved with physician-patient gender, racial, and ethnic concordance. However, female, Black, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islander (NH-PI), and American Indian-Native Alaskan (AI-AN) physicians are underrepresented in anesthesiology. The American Association of Medical Colleges 2018 Diversity in Medicine Report revealed that women comprise only 35% of anesthesiologists yet nearly half of medical school graduates are women. More than 77% of anesthesiologists are White or Asian. Anesthesiology applicant and match trends may provide insights needed to address underrepresentation within anesthesiology. We hypothesized that proportionally fewer women and racially and ethnically minoritized applicants apply and match into anesthesiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study identified 47,117 anesthesiology applicants among the 546,298 residency applicants in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) system between 2011 and 2022 and stratified applicants by self-reported gender, race, and ethnicity. The demographics of anesthesiology trainees reported in the 2014 to 2015, 2018 to 2019, and 2022 to 2023 Accreditation Counsel of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Books were used as surrogates for matched applicants as demographics are not reported by the National Residency Match Program. To facilitate comparisons, ERAS applicants were grouped into 4-year epochs to align with consolidated ACGME reports corresponding to the application years. Odds ratios (OR); 95% confidence interval of applying to and matching into anesthesiology were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women had lower odds of applying to anesthesiology compared to men overall (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.54-0.56, P < .0001) and maintained significantly lowered odds of applying within each epoch. Women had similar odds of matching into anesthesiology residency compared to men (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14, P < .0001). Black, Hispanic or Latino, Asian and NH-PI, and AI-AN applicants had similar odds to White applicants of applying to anesthesiology but odds of matching were significantly lower overall ( P < .0001) for Asian and NH-PI (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.70), Black (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.45-0.53), Hispanic or Latino (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.54), and AI-AN (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.15-0.28) applicants. The odds of matching among some minoritized applicants increased in the ACGME 2022 to 2023 report year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From 2011 to 2022, women had lower odds of applying to anesthesiology residency than men yet had similar odds of matching. Racial and ethnic minoritized groups had significantly lower odds of matching compared to White applicants despite similar odds of applying. These findings highlight disparities in the anesthesiology match and may help identify opportunities to promote workforce diversity within the field. More detailed reporting of gender, race, and ethnicity in annual match data may better define barriers to entry and identify opportunities for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"913-920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient outcomes are improved with physician-patient gender, racial, and ethnic concordance. However, female, Black, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islander (NH-PI), and American Indian-Native Alaskan (AI-AN) physicians are underrepresented in anesthesiology. The American Association of Medical Colleges 2018 Diversity in Medicine Report revealed that women comprise only 35% of anesthesiologists yet nearly half of medical school graduates are women. More than 77% of anesthesiologists are White or Asian. Anesthesiology applicant and match trends may provide insights needed to address underrepresentation within anesthesiology. We hypothesized that proportionally fewer women and racially and ethnically minoritized applicants apply and match into anesthesiology.

Methods: This retrospective observational study identified 47,117 anesthesiology applicants among the 546,298 residency applicants in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) system between 2011 and 2022 and stratified applicants by self-reported gender, race, and ethnicity. The demographics of anesthesiology trainees reported in the 2014 to 2015, 2018 to 2019, and 2022 to 2023 Accreditation Counsel of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Data Resource Books were used as surrogates for matched applicants as demographics are not reported by the National Residency Match Program. To facilitate comparisons, ERAS applicants were grouped into 4-year epochs to align with consolidated ACGME reports corresponding to the application years. Odds ratios (OR); 95% confidence interval of applying to and matching into anesthesiology were analyzed.

Results: Women had lower odds of applying to anesthesiology compared to men overall (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.54-0.56, P < .0001) and maintained significantly lowered odds of applying within each epoch. Women had similar odds of matching into anesthesiology residency compared to men (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14, P < .0001). Black, Hispanic or Latino, Asian and NH-PI, and AI-AN applicants had similar odds to White applicants of applying to anesthesiology but odds of matching were significantly lower overall ( P < .0001) for Asian and NH-PI (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.70), Black (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.45-0.53), Hispanic or Latino (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.46-0.54), and AI-AN (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.15-0.28) applicants. The odds of matching among some minoritized applicants increased in the ACGME 2022 to 2023 report year.

Conclusions: From 2011 to 2022, women had lower odds of applying to anesthesiology residency than men yet had similar odds of matching. Racial and ethnic minoritized groups had significantly lower odds of matching compared to White applicants despite similar odds of applying. These findings highlight disparities in the anesthesiology match and may help identify opportunities to promote workforce diversity within the field. More detailed reporting of gender, race, and ethnicity in annual match data may better define barriers to entry and identify opportunities for improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国麻醉学住院医师选拔中的多样性、公平性和包容性。
背景:医患在性别、种族和民族方面的一致性可改善患者的治疗效果。然而,女性、黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔、夏威夷-太平洋岛民(NH-PI)和美洲印第安人-阿拉斯加原住民(AI-AN)医生在麻醉学领域的代表性不足。美国医学院协会《2018 年医学多样性报告》显示,女性仅占麻醉医师的 35%,而医学院毕业生中却有近一半是女性。超过 77% 的麻醉医师是白人或亚裔。麻醉学申请人和匹配趋势可能为解决麻醉学中代表性不足的问题提供所需的见解。我们假设,申请和匹配进入麻醉科的女性和少数种族及族裔申请人的比例较低:这项回顾性观察研究在 2011 年至 2022 年期间通过住院医师电子申请服务系统(ERAS)从 546298 名住院医师申请者中识别了 47117 名麻醉学申请者,并按照自我报告的性别、种族和民族对申请者进行了分层。由于国家住院医师匹配计划未报告人口统计数据,因此使用 2014 至 2015 年、2018 至 2019 年和 2022 至 2023 年毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)数据资源手册中报告的麻醉学受训人员的人口统计数据作为匹配申请人的替代数据。为便于比较,ERAS 申请人被分为 4 年一组,以便与 ACGME 与申请年份相对应的合并报告保持一致。分析了申请和匹配到麻醉科的几率比(OR);95%置信区间:与男性相比,女性申请麻醉学的几率总体较低(OR,0.55;95% CI,0.54-0.56,P < .0001),并且在每个时期内申请几率都显著降低。与男性相比,女性与麻醉科住院医师的匹配几率相似(OR,1.10;95% CI,1.06-1.14,P < .0001)。黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔、亚裔和 NH-PI 以及 AI-AN 申请者申请麻醉学的几率与白人相似,但亚裔和 NH-PI 以及 AI-AN 申请者的匹配几率明显低于白人(P < .0001)、亚裔和 NH-PI 申请人(OR,0.66;95% CI,0.63-0.70)、黑人申请人(OR,0.49;95% CI,0.45-0.53)、西班牙裔或拉丁裔申请人(OR,0.50;95% CI,0.46-0.54)和美国印第安人申请人(OR,0.20;95% CI,0.15-0.28)。在 ACGME 2022 年至 2023 年的报告年份中,一些少数族裔申请人的匹配几率有所增加:从 2011 年到 2022 年,女性申请麻醉学住院医师培训的几率低于男性,但匹配几率却与男性相似。与白人申请者相比,种族和少数民族申请者的匹配几率明显较低,尽管他们的申请几率相似。这些发现凸显了麻醉学匹配中的差异,可能有助于确定促进该领域劳动力多样性的机会。在年度匹配数据中对性别、种族和民族进行更详细的报告可能会更好地界定入职障碍并确定改进机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes Associated with a Patient Blood Management Program in Major Obstetric Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Airway Evaluation in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis: A Prospective Cohort Study. A Little Blue Butterfly. A Paradigm for Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Anesthesia Practice for Children with Autism for the Generalist Clinician. Association Between Two Muscle-Related Parameters and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Tumor Resection Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1