Comparison of safety of lumbar drain versus external ventricular drain in symptomatic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1177/15910199241276676
Kuo Chao, Daniel Martin, Charles Tsouvalas, James Wiginton, Fernando Torres, Nathan Nguyen
{"title":"Comparison of safety of lumbar drain versus external ventricular drain in symptomatic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Kuo Chao, Daniel Martin, Charles Tsouvalas, James Wiginton, Fernando Torres, Nathan Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/15910199241276676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is typically performed with an external ventricular drain (EVD) for symptomatic hydrocephalus (HCP) following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Lumbar drain (LD) has also been studied to reduce the incidence of vasospasm after SAH but not HCP. We performed a single center retrospective analysis to evaluate the safety of LD versus EVD for symptomatic HCP following aneurysmal SAH in a naturally randomized patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted for aneurysmal SAH who developed symptomatic HCP were treated with EVD or LD depending on neurosurgeon on call. Of the 10 neurosurgeons on call, five would place EVD in all patients while the other five would request LD be placed by interventional neuroradiology; however, the distribution on call was not evenly distributed. We retrospectively compared these two groups for drain complications and outcomes with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2018 to 2021, there were a total of 77 patients with aneurysmal SAH requiring CSF diversion for HCP. There were 56 cases of EVD placement and 21 cases of LD placement. Overall drain complications were 32.0% of cases with EVD and 9.5% with LD, <i>p</i> = .0773. EVD versus LD complications consisted of hemorrhage (1.8% vs 0%, <i>p</i> = 1.0000), infection (7.1 vs 0%, <i>p</i> = .5698), clogged (25% vs 0%, <i>p</i> = .008), dislodgement (1.8% vs 4.6%, <i>p</i> = .4737) and replacement (16% vs 4.8%, <i>p</i> = .2698). No case of cerebellar tonsillar herniation occurred. mRS between EVD versus LD obtained at baseline (0.3 vs 0.3, <i>p</i> = .3943), discharge (3.8 vs 2.7, <i>p</i> = .047), 90 days (2.9 vs 2.0, <i>p</i> = .060), and 1 year (2.6 vs 1.6, <i>p</i> = .081). One year mortality rates between EVD versus LD (26.8% vs 19.0%, <i>p</i> = .483).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Symptomatic HCP after aneurysmal SAH can be effectively and safely treated with LD. LD had lower overall complications than EVD with no hemorrhage, infection or malfunction. Further prospective randomized control study may be helpful in elucidating optimal CSF diversion for patients with symptomatic HCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241276676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241276676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is typically performed with an external ventricular drain (EVD) for symptomatic hydrocephalus (HCP) following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Lumbar drain (LD) has also been studied to reduce the incidence of vasospasm after SAH but not HCP. We performed a single center retrospective analysis to evaluate the safety of LD versus EVD for symptomatic HCP following aneurysmal SAH in a naturally randomized patient population.

Methods: Patients admitted for aneurysmal SAH who developed symptomatic HCP were treated with EVD or LD depending on neurosurgeon on call. Of the 10 neurosurgeons on call, five would place EVD in all patients while the other five would request LD be placed by interventional neuroradiology; however, the distribution on call was not evenly distributed. We retrospectively compared these two groups for drain complications and outcomes with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

Results: From 2018 to 2021, there were a total of 77 patients with aneurysmal SAH requiring CSF diversion for HCP. There were 56 cases of EVD placement and 21 cases of LD placement. Overall drain complications were 32.0% of cases with EVD and 9.5% with LD, p = .0773. EVD versus LD complications consisted of hemorrhage (1.8% vs 0%, p = 1.0000), infection (7.1 vs 0%, p = .5698), clogged (25% vs 0%, p = .008), dislodgement (1.8% vs 4.6%, p = .4737) and replacement (16% vs 4.8%, p = .2698). No case of cerebellar tonsillar herniation occurred. mRS between EVD versus LD obtained at baseline (0.3 vs 0.3, p = .3943), discharge (3.8 vs 2.7, p = .047), 90 days (2.9 vs 2.0, p = .060), and 1 year (2.6 vs 1.6, p = .081). One year mortality rates between EVD versus LD (26.8% vs 19.0%, p = .483).

Conclusion: Symptomatic HCP after aneurysmal SAH can be effectively and safely treated with LD. LD had lower overall complications than EVD with no hemorrhage, infection or malfunction. Further prospective randomized control study may be helpful in elucidating optimal CSF diversion for patients with symptomatic HCP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后出现症状性脑积水时,比较腰椎引流管与脑室外引流管的安全性。
背景和目的:蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后出现症状性脑积水(HCP)时,通常采用脑室外引流管(EVD)进行脑脊液(CSF)引流。腰椎引流管(LD)也被研究用于降低 SAH 后血管痉挛的发生率,但不能降低 HCP 的发生率。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性分析,在自然随机的患者群体中评估 LD 与 EVD 治疗动脉瘤性 SAH 后无症状 HCP 的安全性:因动脉瘤性 SAH 入院并出现无症状 HCP 的患者将根据值班神经外科医生的情况接受 EVD 或 LD 治疗。在值班的 10 名神经外科医生中,5 名医生会为所有患者实施 EVD,而另外 5 名医生会要求介入神经放射科实施 LD;但是,值班医生的分布并不均匀。我们回顾性比较了这两组患者的引流并发症和改良兰金量表(mRS)结果:从 2018 年到 2021 年,共有 77 例动脉瘤性 SAH 患者需要为 HCP 进行 CSF 引流。其中56例为EVD置管,21例为LD置管。在所有引流管并发症中,EVD占32.0%,LD占9.5%,P = 0.0773。EVD 与 LD 的并发症包括出血(1.8% vs 0%,p = 1.0000)、感染(7.1 vs 0%,p = .5698)、堵塞(25% vs 0%,p = .008)、移位(1.8% vs 4.6%,p = .4737)和置换(16% vs 4.8%,p = .2698)。在基线(0.3 vs 0.3,p = .3943)、出院(3.8 vs 2.7,p = .047)、90 天(2.9 vs 2.0,p = .060)和 1 年(2.6 vs 1.6,p = .081)时,EVD 与 LD 的 mRS 比较。EVD与LD的一年死亡率(26.8% vs 19.0%,P = .483):结论:动脉瘤性 SAH 后有症状的 HCP 可通过 LD 得到有效、安全的治疗。结论:动脉瘤性 SAH 后有症状的 HCP 可通过 LD 得到有效、安全的治疗,LD 的总体并发症低于 EVD,且无出血、感染或功能障碍。进一步的前瞻性随机对照研究可能有助于阐明对有症状的 HCP 患者进行 CSF 分流的最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Balloon angioplasty for cerebral vasospasm in preschool children. Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience. Validity of Woven EndoBridge sizing based on the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio. Accelerated aspiration with Q™ catheter: An in vitro study. High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1