Evaluation of a Benzodiazepine Immunoassay for Urine Drug Testing in Clinical Specimens.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae083
Mengyuan Ge, Adekunle Alabi, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata
{"title":"Evaluation of a Benzodiazepine Immunoassay for Urine Drug Testing in Clinical Specimens.","authors":"Mengyuan Ge, Adekunle Alabi, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed medications frequently linked to instances of abuse and overdose. Historically, FDA-cleared benzodiazepine urine immunoassays cross-react poorly with glucuronidated benzodiazepine metabolites, leading to false negatives. Clinical laboratories have addressed this deficiency by creating laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) that incorporate a beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis step to increase the clinical sensitivity of these assays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Performance characteristics of 2 FDA-cleared benzodiazepine urine immunoassays (Benzodiazepines Plus, no glucuronidase and Benzodiazepines II, with glucuronidase; Roche Diagnostics) and a previously described benzodiazepine immunoassay LDT (with glucuronidase) were evaluated using 258 clinical urine specimens. The positive immunoassay cutoff was set at 200 ng/mL of nordiazepam and results were compared to an LC-MS/MS benzodiazepine LDT. Clinical sensitivity, specificity, precision, and immunoassay cross-reactivity were determined for all 3 immunoassays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Benzodiazepines II and LDT immunoassays exhibited greater clinical sensitivity (100% and 95.2%) compared to the Benzodiazepines Plus assay (66.7%). Clinical specificity of 100% was observed for all 3 assays. Immunoassay response of the Benzodiazepines II assay was greater across the range of concentrations tested (100-1000 ng/mL) relative to the other immunoassays and was the most sensitive immunoassay for the detection of lorazepam glucuronide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Benzodiazepines II immunoassay demonstrated the greatest clinical and analytical sensitivity compared to the Benzodiazepines Plus and LDT immunoassays. The incorporation of beta-glucuronidase was crucial, as the Benzodiazepines II and LDT immunoassays demonstrated superior clinical sensitivity when compared to the Benzodiazepines Plus immunoassay that does not incorporate a beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis step.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed medications frequently linked to instances of abuse and overdose. Historically, FDA-cleared benzodiazepine urine immunoassays cross-react poorly with glucuronidated benzodiazepine metabolites, leading to false negatives. Clinical laboratories have addressed this deficiency by creating laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) that incorporate a beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis step to increase the clinical sensitivity of these assays.

Methods: Performance characteristics of 2 FDA-cleared benzodiazepine urine immunoassays (Benzodiazepines Plus, no glucuronidase and Benzodiazepines II, with glucuronidase; Roche Diagnostics) and a previously described benzodiazepine immunoassay LDT (with glucuronidase) were evaluated using 258 clinical urine specimens. The positive immunoassay cutoff was set at 200 ng/mL of nordiazepam and results were compared to an LC-MS/MS benzodiazepine LDT. Clinical sensitivity, specificity, precision, and immunoassay cross-reactivity were determined for all 3 immunoassays.

Results: The Benzodiazepines II and LDT immunoassays exhibited greater clinical sensitivity (100% and 95.2%) compared to the Benzodiazepines Plus assay (66.7%). Clinical specificity of 100% was observed for all 3 assays. Immunoassay response of the Benzodiazepines II assay was greater across the range of concentrations tested (100-1000 ng/mL) relative to the other immunoassays and was the most sensitive immunoassay for the detection of lorazepam glucuronide.

Conclusions: The Benzodiazepines II immunoassay demonstrated the greatest clinical and analytical sensitivity compared to the Benzodiazepines Plus and LDT immunoassays. The incorporation of beta-glucuronidase was crucial, as the Benzodiazepines II and LDT immunoassays demonstrated superior clinical sensitivity when compared to the Benzodiazepines Plus immunoassay that does not incorporate a beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis step.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于临床样本尿液药物检测的苯并二氮杂卓免疫测定。
背景:苯二氮卓类药物是常用的处方药,经常与滥用和过量有关。一直以来,美国食品及药物管理局批准的苯二氮杂卓尿液免疫测定与葡萄糖醛酸化苯二氮杂卓代谢物的交叉反应较差,从而导致假阴性。临床实验室为解决这一缺陷,开发了实验室开发的检测方法(LDTs),其中包含β-葡萄糖醛酸酶水解步骤,以提高这些检测方法的临床灵敏度:方法: 使用 258 份临床尿液标本评估了 2 种通过 FDA 认证的苯并二氮杂卓尿液免疫测定(不含葡萄糖醛酸酶的苯并二氮杂卓 Plus 和含葡萄糖醛酸酶的苯并二氮杂卓 II;罗氏诊断公司)和以前描述过的苯并二氮杂卓免疫测定 LDT(含葡萄糖醛酸酶)的性能特征。免疫测定的阳性临界值设定为 200 纳克/毫升的诺地西泮,并将结果与 LC-MS/MS 苯二氮卓类药物 LDT 进行了比较。对所有 3 种免疫测定的临床灵敏度、特异性、精确度和免疫测定交叉反应进行了测定:苯二氮卓 II 和 LDT 免疫测定的临床灵敏度(100% 和 95.2%)高于苯二氮卓 Plus 检测法(66.7%)。所有 3 种检测方法的临床特异性均为 100%。与其他免疫测定法相比,苯二氮卓 II 检测法的免疫测定反应在整个测试浓度范围(100-1000 纳克/毫升)内都更大,是检测葡萄糖醛酸劳拉西泮最灵敏的免疫测定法:结论:与 Benzodiazepines Plus 和 LDT 免疫测定相比,Benzodiazepines II 免疫测定的临床和分析灵敏度最高。加入 beta-葡萄糖醛酸酶至关重要,因为与不加入 beta-葡萄糖醛酸酶水解步骤的 Benzodiazepines Plus 免疫测定相比,Benzodiazepines II 和 LDT 免疫测定的临床灵敏度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Unraveling Uncertainty: The Impact of Biological and Analytical Variation on the Prediction Uncertainty of Categorical Prediction Models. Fundamental Uncertainty: Interplatform Inconsistency of FDA-Cleared Serological Tests. Commentary on Myocarditis or Myositis? Rising, Declining, and Rising of Critical Cardiac Troponin T Levels in a Patient Post Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Myocarditis or Myositis? Rising, Declining, and Rising of Critical Cardiac Troponin T Levels in a Patient Post Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Point-of-Care Testing Biosafety Decisions: An Investigation Summary Illustrating Current Decision-Making Process in Ontario, Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1