Analytical Validation and Performance of a Blood-Based P-tau217 Diagnostic Test for Alzheimer Disease.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae155
Adam Abel, Antonio Chambers, Jeff Fill, Heinz Reiske, Ming Lu, Amanda Morris, Paul Faya, Rose C Beck, Michael J Pontecorvo, Emily C Collins, Andrew E Schade, Mark A Mintun, Michael E Hodsdon
{"title":"Analytical Validation and Performance of a Blood-Based P-tau217 Diagnostic Test for Alzheimer Disease.","authors":"Adam Abel, Antonio Chambers, Jeff Fill, Heinz Reiske, Ming Lu, Amanda Morris, Paul Faya, Rose C Beck, Michael J Pontecorvo, Emily C Collins, Andrew E Schade, Mark A Mintun, Michael E Hodsdon","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood-based biomarkers, especially P-tau217, have been gaining interest as diagnostic tools to measure Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a plasma P-tau217 chemiluminescent immunoassay using 4G10E2 and IBA493 as antibodies, a synthetic tau peptide as calibrator, and the Quanterix SP-X imager. Analytical validation performed in a College of American Pathologists-accredited CLIA laboratory involved multiple kit lots, operators, timepoints, and imagers. Florbetapir positron emission tomography was used to quantify amyloid for clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Precision across 80 runs was ≤20% CV using 23 patient-derived samples ranging from 0.09 U/mL to 3.35 U/mL. No significant lot-to-lot differences were observed. There was no interference from purified tau (2N4R) or lipemia, but hemolysis greater than 2 + was not acceptable. Functional analytical sensitivity (lower limit of quantitation) was 0.08 U/mL. Linearity studies support the use of a standard 1:2 plasma dilution. Samples demonstrated stability at 7 freeze/thaw cycles, with room temperature and refrigerated stability established for up to 72 hours. The final analytical measurement range was 0.08 to 2.81 U/mL. The calibration curve maintained ≤20% CV for raw signal intensity and 80% to 120% relative error for back-fitted concentration using a log-log power regression. Initial clinical assessment using plasma samples from 1091 individuals screened in TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 demonstrated an area under the curve of 91.6% (95% CI 0.90-0.94) with brain amyloid as the comparator. Positive and negative predictive value was >90% and >85%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through analytical validation, this assay demonstrated robust performance across multiple lots, operators, and instruments and could be used as a tool for diagnosing AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood-based biomarkers, especially P-tau217, have been gaining interest as diagnostic tools to measure Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology.

Methods: We developed a plasma P-tau217 chemiluminescent immunoassay using 4G10E2 and IBA493 as antibodies, a synthetic tau peptide as calibrator, and the Quanterix SP-X imager. Analytical validation performed in a College of American Pathologists-accredited CLIA laboratory involved multiple kit lots, operators, timepoints, and imagers. Florbetapir positron emission tomography was used to quantify amyloid for clinical validation.

Results: Precision across 80 runs was ≤20% CV using 23 patient-derived samples ranging from 0.09 U/mL to 3.35 U/mL. No significant lot-to-lot differences were observed. There was no interference from purified tau (2N4R) or lipemia, but hemolysis greater than 2 + was not acceptable. Functional analytical sensitivity (lower limit of quantitation) was 0.08 U/mL. Linearity studies support the use of a standard 1:2 plasma dilution. Samples demonstrated stability at 7 freeze/thaw cycles, with room temperature and refrigerated stability established for up to 72 hours. The final analytical measurement range was 0.08 to 2.81 U/mL. The calibration curve maintained ≤20% CV for raw signal intensity and 80% to 120% relative error for back-fitted concentration using a log-log power regression. Initial clinical assessment using plasma samples from 1091 individuals screened in TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 demonstrated an area under the curve of 91.6% (95% CI 0.90-0.94) with brain amyloid as the comparator. Positive and negative predictive value was >90% and >85%, respectively.

Conclusions: Through analytical validation, this assay demonstrated robust performance across multiple lots, operators, and instruments and could be used as a tool for diagnosing AD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Analytical Validation and Performance of a Blood-Based P-tau217 Diagnostic Test for Alzheimer Disease. Comparison of Referral Rates and Costs Using Fibrosis-4 and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Testing Strategies for Initial Evaluation of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) in a Veteran Population. Determination of Positivity Cutoff for an Automated Aspergillus fumigatus-Specific Immunoglobulin-G Assay in a National Reference Laboratory. Revisiting the Environmental Impact of Inappropriate Clinical Laboratory Testing: A Comprehensive Overview of Sustainability, Economic, and Quality of Care Outcomes. What Is Diagnostic Stewardship?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1