Seeing the Forest but Naming the Trees: An Object-Over-Place Bias in Learning Noun Labels.

Q1 Social Sciences Open Mind Pub Date : 2024-08-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00154
Yi Lin, Moira R Dillon
{"title":"Seeing the Forest but Naming the Trees: An Object-Over-Place Bias in Learning Noun Labels.","authors":"Yi Lin, Moira R Dillon","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objects and places are foundational spatial domains represented in human symbolic expressions, like drawings, which show a prioritization of depicting small-scale object-shape information over the large-scale navigable place information in which objects are situated. Is there a similar object-over-place bias in language? Across six experiments, adults and 3- to 4-year-old children were asked either to extend a novel noun in a labeling phrase, to extend a novel noun in a prepositional phrase, or to simply match pictures. To dissociate specific object and place information from more general figure and ground information, participants either saw scenes with both place information (a room) and object information (a block in the room), or scenes with two kinds of object information that matched the figure-ground relations of the room and block by presenting an open container with a smaller block inside. While adults showed a specific object-over-place bias in both extending novel noun labels and matching, they did not show this bias in extending novel nouns following prepositions. Young children showed this bias in extending novel noun labels only. Spatial domains may thus confer specific and foundational biases for word learning that may change through development in a way that is similar to that of other word-learning biases about objects, like the shape bias. These results expand the symbolic scope of prior studies on object biases in drawing to object biases in language, and they expand the spatial domains of prior studies characterizing the language of objects and places.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"8 ","pages":"972-994"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objects and places are foundational spatial domains represented in human symbolic expressions, like drawings, which show a prioritization of depicting small-scale object-shape information over the large-scale navigable place information in which objects are situated. Is there a similar object-over-place bias in language? Across six experiments, adults and 3- to 4-year-old children were asked either to extend a novel noun in a labeling phrase, to extend a novel noun in a prepositional phrase, or to simply match pictures. To dissociate specific object and place information from more general figure and ground information, participants either saw scenes with both place information (a room) and object information (a block in the room), or scenes with two kinds of object information that matched the figure-ground relations of the room and block by presenting an open container with a smaller block inside. While adults showed a specific object-over-place bias in both extending novel noun labels and matching, they did not show this bias in extending novel nouns following prepositions. Young children showed this bias in extending novel noun labels only. Spatial domains may thus confer specific and foundational biases for word learning that may change through development in a way that is similar to that of other word-learning biases about objects, like the shape bias. These results expand the symbolic scope of prior studies on object biases in drawing to object biases in language, and they expand the spatial domains of prior studies characterizing the language of objects and places.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只见树木,不见森林:学习名词标签时的 "物位偏差"》(A Object-Over-Place Bias in Learning Noun Labels.
物体和地点是人类符号表达中的基础空间领域,比如图画,图画显示出优先描绘小范围的物体形状信息,而不是物体所在的大范围可导航地点信息。语言中是否也存在类似的 "物体-地点 "偏差呢?在六次实验中,成人和 3-4 岁的儿童被要求在标注短语中扩展一个新名词,在介词短语中扩展一个新名词,或者仅仅匹配图片。为了把特定的物体和地点信息与更一般的图形和地面信息区分开来,被试要么看到既有地点信息(一个房间)又有物体信息(房间里的一个木块)的场景,要么看到有两种物体信息的场景,通过呈现一个打开的容器和里面一个较小的木块来匹配房间和木块的图形-地面关系。虽然成人在扩展新名词标签和匹配时都表现出了特定的对象大于位置的偏向,但他们在扩展介词后的新名词时却没有表现出这种偏向。幼儿仅在扩展新名词标签时表现出这种偏差。因此,空间领域可能会给单词学习带来特定的、基础性的偏误,这种偏误可能会随着发展而改变,其方式类似于其他有关物体的单词学习偏误,如形状偏误。这些结果将之前关于绘画中物体偏向的研究的符号范围扩大到了语言中的物体偏向,并扩大了之前关于物体和地点语言特点的研究的空间领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Approximating Human-Level 3D Visual Inferences With Deep Neural Networks. Prosodic Cues Support Inferences About the Question's Pedagogical Intent. The Double Standard of Ownership. Combination and Differentiation Theories of Categorization: A Comparison Using Participants' Categorization Descriptions. Investigating Sensitivity to Shared Information and Personal Experience in Children's Use of Majority Information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1