Interruption reduction during oral medication rounds among nurses in hematology-oncology wards: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000457
Jia Wen Siah, Crystal Kai Tian Cheng, Chloe Leyi Choy, Poh Chi Tho, Siew Ping Lang
{"title":"Interruption reduction during oral medication rounds among nurses in hematology-oncology wards: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Jia Wen Siah, Crystal Kai Tian Cheng, Chloe Leyi Choy, Poh Chi Tho, Siew Ping Lang","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the project was to reduce interruptions during oral medication rounds among nurses working in hematology-oncology wards by improving compliance with best practices by 20%.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medication errors can adversely affect patient safety. Hence, understanding the underlying contributors to medication errors is necessary. Nurses are the ones who administer medications to patients; however, in clinical areas, interruptions are prevalent and could contribute to medication errors. It is therefore recommended that interventions be implemented to minimize interruptions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project was conducted in two hematology-oncology wards from March 2022 to March 2023. Target participants were nurses who served medications in the morning. The project followed an evidence-based audit and feedback methodology using the seven-phase JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) was used to support the audit and feedback process. An interruption reduction bundle consisting of three best practices was implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, only 24% of medications administered occurred without interruption. One month after implementation, there was a 51% improvement in compliance. Six months after implementation, compliance increased to 58%. Nine months post-implementation, the compliance rate remained at 59%. Absolute interruption counts decreased from 47 (baseline), to 27 (1 month post-implementation), to 24 (6 months post-implementation), to 16 (9 months post-implementation). All types of interruptions decreased when comparing the baseline with the latest post-implementation result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The project used evidence-based interventions in a bundle, effectively reducing interruptions during oral medication rounds, and sustaining positive results.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A256.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the project was to reduce interruptions during oral medication rounds among nurses working in hematology-oncology wards by improving compliance with best practices by 20%.

Introduction: Medication errors can adversely affect patient safety. Hence, understanding the underlying contributors to medication errors is necessary. Nurses are the ones who administer medications to patients; however, in clinical areas, interruptions are prevalent and could contribute to medication errors. It is therefore recommended that interventions be implemented to minimize interruptions.

Methods: This project was conducted in two hematology-oncology wards from March 2022 to March 2023. Target participants were nurses who served medications in the morning. The project followed an evidence-based audit and feedback methodology using the seven-phase JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) was used to support the audit and feedback process. An interruption reduction bundle consisting of three best practices was implemented.

Results: At baseline, only 24% of medications administered occurred without interruption. One month after implementation, there was a 51% improvement in compliance. Six months after implementation, compliance increased to 58%. Nine months post-implementation, the compliance rate remained at 59%. Absolute interruption counts decreased from 47 (baseline), to 27 (1 month post-implementation), to 24 (6 months post-implementation), to 16 (9 months post-implementation). All types of interruptions decreased when comparing the baseline with the latest post-implementation result.

Conclusions: The project used evidence-based interventions in a bundle, effectively reducing interruptions during oral medication rounds, and sustaining positive results.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A256.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少血液肿瘤科病房护士口服药物查房时的中断:最佳实践实施项目。
项目目标该项目的目的是将血液肿瘤科病房护士在口服药物查房时的中断情况减少 20%,从而提高最佳实践的依从性:用药错误会对患者安全造成不利影响。因此,有必要了解造成用药错误的根本原因。护士是为患者用药的人,但在临床领域,中断用药的情况非常普遍,可能会导致用药错误。因此,建议实施干预措施,尽量减少中断:本项目于 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月在两个血液肿瘤科病房进行。目标参与者为上午提供药物的护士。该项目采用基于证据的审核和反馈方法,使用七阶段 JBI 证据实施框架。JBI 的临床证据实际应用系统 (PACES) 用于支持审核和反馈流程。实施了由三种最佳实践组成的减少中断捆绑计划:结果:基线时,只有 24% 的用药没有中断。实施一个月后,依从性提高了 51%。实施六个月后,依从性提高到 58%。实施九个月后,依从率保持在 59%。绝对中断次数从 47 次(基线)下降到 27 次(实施后 1 个月)、24 次(实施后 6 个月)和 16 次(实施后 9 个月)。将基线与实施后的最新结果相比,所有类型的中断次数都有所减少:该项目将循证干预措施捆绑使用,有效减少了口服药物查房期间的中断情况,并保持了积极成果。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A256。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1