Retinotopy drives the variation in scene responses across visual field map divisions of the occipital place area.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1167/jov.24.8.10
Catriona L Scrivener, Elisa Zamboni, Antony B Morland, Edward H Silson
{"title":"Retinotopy drives the variation in scene responses across visual field map divisions of the occipital place area.","authors":"Catriona L Scrivener, Elisa Zamboni, Antony B Morland, Edward H Silson","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.8.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The occipital place area (OPA) is a scene-selective region on the lateral surface of human occipitotemporal cortex that spatially overlaps multiple visual field maps, as well as portions of cortex that are not currently defined as retinotopic. Here we combined population receptive field modeling and responses to scenes in a representational similarity analysis (RSA) framework to test the prediction that the OPA's visual field map divisions contribute uniquely to the overall pattern of scene selectivity within the OPA. Consistent with this prediction, the patterns of response to a set of complex scenes were heterogeneous between maps. To explain this heterogeneity, we tested the explanatory power of seven candidate models using RSA. These models spanned different scene dimensions (Content, Expanse, Distance), low- and high-level visual features, and navigational affordances. None of the tested models could account for the variation in scene response observed between the OPA's visual field maps. However, the heterogeneity in scene response was correlated with the differences in retinotopic profiles across maps. These data highlight the need to carefully examine the relationship between regions defined as category-selective and the underlying retinotopy, and they suggest that, in the case of the OPA, it may not be appropriate to conceptualize it as a single scene-selective region.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11343012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.8.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The occipital place area (OPA) is a scene-selective region on the lateral surface of human occipitotemporal cortex that spatially overlaps multiple visual field maps, as well as portions of cortex that are not currently defined as retinotopic. Here we combined population receptive field modeling and responses to scenes in a representational similarity analysis (RSA) framework to test the prediction that the OPA's visual field map divisions contribute uniquely to the overall pattern of scene selectivity within the OPA. Consistent with this prediction, the patterns of response to a set of complex scenes were heterogeneous between maps. To explain this heterogeneity, we tested the explanatory power of seven candidate models using RSA. These models spanned different scene dimensions (Content, Expanse, Distance), low- and high-level visual features, and navigational affordances. None of the tested models could account for the variation in scene response observed between the OPA's visual field maps. However, the heterogeneity in scene response was correlated with the differences in retinotopic profiles across maps. These data highlight the need to carefully examine the relationship between regions defined as category-selective and the underlying retinotopy, and they suggest that, in the case of the OPA, it may not be appropriate to conceptualize it as a single scene-selective region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜视图驱动了枕叶位置区视场图各分区场景反应的变化。
枕叶位置区(OPA)是人类枕颞皮层外侧表面的一个场景选择区,它在空间上与多个视场图以及目前尚未定义为视网膜视位的皮层部分重叠。在这里,我们在表象相似性分析(RSA)框架中结合了群体感受野建模和对场景的反应,以检验 OPA 的视野图划分对 OPA 内场景选择性整体模式的独特贡献这一预测。与这一预测相一致的是,不同视场图之间对一组复杂场景的反应模式是不同的。为了解释这种异质性,我们使用 RSA 测试了七个候选模型的解释力。这些模型涵盖了不同的场景维度(内容、广度、距离)、低级和高级视觉特征以及导航能力。没有一个测试模型能够解释在 OPA 视场图之间观察到的场景反应差异。然而,场景反应的异质性与不同视网膜图之间视网膜图谱的差异相关。这些数据突出表明,有必要仔细研究被定义为类别选择性的区域与底层视网膜视图之间的关系,它们还表明,就 OPA 而言,将其概念化为单一的场景选择性区域可能并不合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences reveal similarities in serial dependence effects across perceptual tasks, but not to oculomotor tasks. Investigating the relationship between subjective perception and unconscious feature integration. Binocular integration of chromatic and luminance signals. Deep convolutional neural networks are sensitive to face configuration. How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1