Psychopathy and Impairments in Emotion Regulation: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

IF 13.7 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102482

Patrizia Velotti PhD , Serena Bruno , Guyonne Rogier , Sara Beomonte Zobel , Martina Vacchino , Carlo Garofalo , David S. Kosson

{"title":"Psychopathy and Impairments in Emotion Regulation: A systematic review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Patrizia Velotti PhD , Serena Bruno , Guyonne Rogier , Sara Beomonte Zobel , Martina Vacchino , Carlo Garofalo , David S. Kosson","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Considering the sparse but rapidly growing literature concerning the relationship between psychopathy and emotion regulation, taking stock of accumulating knowledge in a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing results is needed. We performed a systematic search (up to May 30, 2024) following PRISMA guidelines of five scientific databases (PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). Also, gray literature was searched. After removing the duplicates, a total of 8.786 records were screened, and 73 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria used for systematic review. The meta-analytic procedure was performed on 55 identified studies consistent with the criteria adopted, which overall comprised 29.856 individuals. The current systematic and meta-analysis review has clarified the association between impairments of emotional regulation abilities and facets of psychopathy. More specifically, analyses indicated that emotional dysregulation is associated with overall levels of psychopathic traits, as well as with both the lifestyle and affective components of psychopathy, which suggests the utility of assessing these features when designing interventions focused on modulating negative emotional states and enhancing regulation of impulsive behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102482"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027273582400103X/pdfft?md5=26b9525e9a719f88ece545a7a5417527&pid=1-s2.0-S027273582400103X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027273582400103X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the sparse but rapidly growing literature concerning the relationship between psychopathy and emotion regulation, taking stock of accumulating knowledge in a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing results is needed. We performed a systematic search (up to May 30, 2024) following PRISMA guidelines of five scientific databases (PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). Also, gray literature was searched. After removing the duplicates, a total of 8.786 records were screened, and 73 articles were selected based on the inclusion criteria used for systematic review. The meta-analytic procedure was performed on 55 identified studies consistent with the criteria adopted, which overall comprised 29.856 individuals. The current systematic and meta-analysis review has clarified the association between impairments of emotional regulation abilities and facets of psychopathy. More specifically, analyses indicated that emotional dysregulation is associated with overall levels of psychopathic traits, as well as with both the lifestyle and affective components of psychopathy, which suggests the utility of assessing these features when designing interventions focused on modulating negative emotional states and enhancing regulation of impulsive behaviors.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

精神变态与情绪调节障碍：系统回顾与元分析》。

考虑到有关心理变态与情绪调节之间关系的文献数量稀少但增长迅速，我们有必要通过对现有结果进行系统回顾和荟萃分析来总结不断积累的知识。我们按照 PRISMA 准则对五个科学数据库（PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science）进行了系统检索（截至 2024 年 5 月 30 日）。此外，还检索了灰色文献。在去除重复文献后，共筛选出 8.786 条记录，并根据系统综述的纳入标准筛选出 73 篇文章。根据所采用的标准，对 55 项已确定的研究进行了荟萃分析程序，这些研究的总人数为 29856 人。目前的系统性和荟萃分析综述阐明了情绪调节能力障碍与心理变态各方面之间的关联。更具体地说，分析表明情绪失调与精神变态特质的总体水平以及精神变态的生活方式和情感因素有关，这表明在设计干预措施时，评估这些特征对于调节负面情绪状态和加强冲动行为的调节非常有用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

23.10

自引率

1.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.