Challenging established norms: The unanticipated role of alcohols in UV/PDS radical quenching.

Journal of hazardous materials Pub Date : 2024-10-05 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502
Boqiang Li, Baiyang Chen, Zongsu Wei
{"title":"Challenging established norms: The unanticipated role of alcohols in UV/PDS radical quenching.","authors":"Boqiang Li, Baiyang Chen, Zongsu Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>UV/peroxydisulfate (UV/PDS) process is known to be highly efficient for degrading micropollutants from water by generating sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup>) and hydroxyl radicals (HO<sup>•</sup>). Reliable analyses of short-lived SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> and HO<sup>•</sup> are therefore critical for understanding reaction mechanisms and optimizing operating conditions. Currently, alcohols are commonly used as quenchers to distinguish radicals based on the assumption that they exclusively react with target radicals without other influences. However, this study for the first time reveals a series of unexpected effects that challenge this conventional wisdom because: 1) adding alcohols altered the decomposition rates of PDS by replacing the reactions between SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> and HO<sup>•</sup> with PDS by the reactions between secondary reactive species and PDS; and 2) SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> preferably reacted with alcohols to generate nonnegligible level of hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) under oxygen-rich conditions, which subsequently led to indirect formation of HO<sup>•</sup>. Additionally, the formation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was substantially impacted by the types of alcohols, dosages, dissolved oxygen, and solution pH. Using probe tests as tools, we found that the actual SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> levels after dosing alcohols were only slightly different from assumed/expected levels, whereas the actually HO<sup>•</sup> levels were 43.7, 3364.9, and 12.5 times higher than assumed/expected conditions for samples dosed with methanol, iso-propanol, and tert-butanol, respectively. These unanticipated effects thus suggest that cautions are needed when using alcohols to qualitative and quantitative determine HO<sup>•</sup> and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>•-</sup> in UV/PDS process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

UV/peroxydisulfate (UV/PDS) process is known to be highly efficient for degrading micropollutants from water by generating sulfate (SO4•-) and hydroxyl radicals (HO). Reliable analyses of short-lived SO4•- and HO are therefore critical for understanding reaction mechanisms and optimizing operating conditions. Currently, alcohols are commonly used as quenchers to distinguish radicals based on the assumption that they exclusively react with target radicals without other influences. However, this study for the first time reveals a series of unexpected effects that challenge this conventional wisdom because: 1) adding alcohols altered the decomposition rates of PDS by replacing the reactions between SO4•- and HO with PDS by the reactions between secondary reactive species and PDS; and 2) SO4•- preferably reacted with alcohols to generate nonnegligible level of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) under oxygen-rich conditions, which subsequently led to indirect formation of HO. Additionally, the formation of H2O2 was substantially impacted by the types of alcohols, dosages, dissolved oxygen, and solution pH. Using probe tests as tools, we found that the actual SO4•- levels after dosing alcohols were only slightly different from assumed/expected levels, whereas the actually HO levels were 43.7, 3364.9, and 12.5 times higher than assumed/expected conditions for samples dosed with methanol, iso-propanol, and tert-butanol, respectively. These unanticipated effects thus suggest that cautions are needed when using alcohols to qualitative and quantitative determine HO and SO4•- in UV/PDS process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战既定规范:醇类在 UV/PDS 自由基淬灭中的意外作用。
众所周知,紫外线/过氧化二硫酸盐(UV/PDS)工艺可通过产生硫酸盐(SO4--)和羟基自由基(HO--)高效降解水中的微污染物。因此,对短寿命 SO4-- 和 HO- 的可靠分析对于了解反应机制和优化操作条件至关重要。目前,醇类通常被用作区分自由基的淬灭剂,其假设是醇类只与目标自由基发生反应而不受其他影响。然而,本研究首次揭示了一系列意想不到的效果,挑战了这一传统观点,因为1) 加入醇类改变了 PDS 的分解率,将 SO4--和 HO- 与 PDS 的反应改为次生反应物与 PDS 的反应;以及 2) 在富氧条件下,SO4--最好与醇类反应生成不可忽略的过氧化氢(H2O2),随后间接形成 HO-。此外,醇的种类、剂量、溶解氧和溶液 pH 对 H2O2 的形成有很大影响。以探针测试为工具,我们发现在添加酒精后,SO4--的实际水平与假定/预期水平仅略有不同,而添加甲醇、异丙醇和叔丁醇的样品中,HO-的实际水平分别比假定/预期条件高出 43.7、3364.9 和 12.5 倍。因此,这些意想不到的影响表明,在 UV/PDS 过程中使用醇类来定性和定量测定 HO- 和 SO4--时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic exploration of COVlD-19 antiviral drug ritonavir on anaerobic digestion through experimental validation coupled with metagenomics analysis. Antibiotic intermediates and antibiotics synergistically promote the development of multiple antibiotic resistance in antibiotic production wastewater. Study on the variation mechanism of Zn isotope in polluted farmland soil. Catalytic membrane with dual-layer structure for ultrafast degradation of emerging contaminants in surface water treatment. Phototransformation and photoreactivity of MPs-DOM in aqueous environment: Key role of MPs structure decoded by optical and molecular signatures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1