Improving Prelicensure Student Learning and Experience With Interactive Online Learning Modules.

Megan E Stuffle
{"title":"Improving Prelicensure Student Learning and Experience With Interactive Online Learning Modules.","authors":"Megan E Stuffle","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240513-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fundamentals of Nursing students at a large school of nursing in the Midwest reported difficulty using their course textbooks. There was also an increase in course failures and a decrease in performance on a Fundamentals of Nursing National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX-RN<sup>®</sup>) preparatory proctored examination.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pilot project was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive, online learning modules compared to textbook readings on student performance, access and use of resources, and student experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the pilot there was a significant improvement in course grades among traditional but not accelerated students using the modules compared to those using the textbook. Students reported that the modules were more engaging, cost-effective, and appealing to various learning styles. Weaknesses identified were the module lengths and technological concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The online, interactive modules engaged students with course materials, reduced costs, and may have changed student performance. Additional research is needed among students in other courses and programs. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240513-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fundamentals of Nursing students at a large school of nursing in the Midwest reported difficulty using their course textbooks. There was also an increase in course failures and a decrease in performance on a Fundamentals of Nursing National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX-RN®) preparatory proctored examination.

Method: A pilot project was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of interactive, online learning modules compared to textbook readings on student performance, access and use of resources, and student experience.

Results: Following the pilot there was a significant improvement in course grades among traditional but not accelerated students using the modules compared to those using the textbook. Students reported that the modules were more engaging, cost-effective, and appealing to various learning styles. Weaknesses identified were the module lengths and technological concerns.

Conclusion: The online, interactive modules engaged students with course materials, reduced costs, and may have changed student performance. Additional research is needed among students in other courses and programs. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用交互式在线学习模块改善执业前学生的学习和体验。
背景:美国中西部一所大型护理学校的护理学基础专业学生报告称,他们在使用教材时遇到困难。此外,课程不及格率也有所上升,在护理学基础国家委员会执照考试 (NCLEX-RN®) 预备监考中的成绩也有所下降:实施了一个试点项目,以评估互动式在线学习模块与课本阅读相比,在学生成绩、资源访问和使用以及学生体验方面的效果:试点项目结束后,与使用教科书的学生相比,使用模块的传统学生(非速成学生)的课程成绩有了显著提高。学生们表示,这些模块更有吸引力,成本效益更高,而且对各种学习风格更有吸引力。不足之处在于模块的长度和技术问题:在线互动模块让学生参与到课程材料中,降低了成本,并可能改变了学生的学习成绩。需要在其他课程和项目的学生中开展更多研究。[J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative Mentorship: Two Innovative Approaches for New Faculty Success. Development of the "Through the Eyes of …" Program for Improving Cultural Awareness. Equipping Nurse Practitioner Students With Social Determinants of Health Competencies. Integrating Implicit Bias Training for Undergraduate Holistic Admission Reviewers. Understanding NCLEX-RN Repeat Writers' Learning Needs: A Pilot Developmental Design Research Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1