Innovative Exercise for Nursing PhD Students: Addressing Biases During Integrative Literature Reviews.

Knar Sagherian, Katy Malone, Karen Rose
{"title":"Innovative Exercise for Nursing PhD Students: Addressing Biases During Integrative Literature Reviews.","authors":"Knar Sagherian, Katy Malone, Karen Rose","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240501-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing PhD students face the difficulty of conducting integrative literature reviews that may lead to bias and lack of rigor particularly in the literature search, data evaluation, and data analysis stages. This article describes the development and use of an arts-based learning exercise to identify potential biases and improve on the critical and writing skills of students during the integrative literature review process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The exercise consisted of visits to the university's museum, moderated discussions with nursing faculty and the museum educator, visual analyses of artwork, building art portfolios, and writing assignments. The exercise was modified over 3 years based on student feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students reported the exercise helped in critical and writing skills, in identifying areas of potential bias, and in enhancing the methodological rigor of the review process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conducting literature reviews is integral in doctoral nursing education and this innovative exercise can facilitate this process. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240501-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing PhD students face the difficulty of conducting integrative literature reviews that may lead to bias and lack of rigor particularly in the literature search, data evaluation, and data analysis stages. This article describes the development and use of an arts-based learning exercise to identify potential biases and improve on the critical and writing skills of students during the integrative literature review process.

Method: The exercise consisted of visits to the university's museum, moderated discussions with nursing faculty and the museum educator, visual analyses of artwork, building art portfolios, and writing assignments. The exercise was modified over 3 years based on student feedback.

Results: Students reported the exercise helped in critical and writing skills, in identifying areas of potential bias, and in enhancing the methodological rigor of the review process.

Conclusion: Conducting literature reviews is integral in doctoral nursing education and this innovative exercise can facilitate this process. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理学博士生的创新练习:解决综合文献综述中的偏见。
背景:护理学博士生在进行综合文献综述时面临着困难,这可能会导致偏差和缺乏严谨性,尤其是在文献检索、数据评估和数据分析阶段。本文介绍了如何开发和使用基于艺术的学习练习,以识别潜在的偏见,并提高学生在综合文献综述过程中的批判和写作能力:该练习包括参观大学博物馆、与护理专业教师和博物馆教育者进行讨论、对艺术品进行视觉分析、建立艺术作品集以及布置写作作业。根据学生的反馈意见,该练习在 3 年中进行了修改:结果:学生们表示,该练习有助于提高批判能力和写作技巧,有助于识别可能存在偏见的领域,有助于提高综述过程在方法论上的严谨性:结论:进行文献综述是护理博士教育中不可或缺的一部分,这一创新练习可促进这一过程。[J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fulbright as Opportunity for U.S. Nursing Educators and International Nursing Schools. Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review. Meeting Quality Improvement Learning Outcomes: Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. A Multimodal Learning Approach in an Undergraduate Palliative Care Nursing Unit of Study. Adopting Optimal Statistical Practices: Reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1