Testing the hydrological performance of live pole drains (LPD) for mitigation of slope instability

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107360
Fernanda Berlitz , Eefje Benschop , Slobodan B. Mickovski , Alejandro Gonzalez-Ollauri
{"title":"Testing the hydrological performance of live pole drains (LPD) for mitigation of slope instability","authors":"Fernanda Berlitz ,&nbsp;Eefje Benschop ,&nbsp;Slobodan B. Mickovski ,&nbsp;Alejandro Gonzalez-Ollauri","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature-based solutions (NbS) and soil bioengineering techniques have gained considerable attention due to their relevant hydrological functions and ability to mitigate slope instability. Live pole drains (LPD), a lesser-known NbS, have traditionally been deployed on slopes to drain the excess surface water and regulate the soil's water budget, making it a suitable technique for stormwater management and landslide prevention. However, neither the LPD performance as a plant-based drainage system nor its potential to regulate the soil-water budget through hydrological processes have been thoroughly studied. This paper presents a novel pilot, lab-based approach for testing the hydrological performance of LPD under different soil hydrological conditions. We built three different treatments and investigated their hydrological performance under multiple storm events. We explored how LPD regulate the soil-water budget by partitioning the water inputs (i.e., rainfall precipitation) into water outputs (i.e., surface runoff, subsurface flow, and percolation). The study revealed that LPD can effectively manage stormwater by draining excess runoff and buffering water in the soil, outperforming fallow soil. Subsurface flow and percolation were significantly higher under LPD treatments when compared to fallow ground, suggesting that the presence of an enhanced structure in the soil results in high soil hydrological performance. The presence of a secondary species with the LPD showed a more efficient hydrological performance than an LPD alone, which aligns with the current implementation of NbS fostering biodiversity. Antecedent soil moisture impacted the hydrological performance of LPD by altering the relative infiltration capacity of the soil and by potentially modifying the availability of channels for preferential flow. Our findings provide a sound basis for future research to improve our understanding of the hydrological performance of LPD for slope instability mitigation and encourage their reproduction and upscaling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 107360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742400185X/pdfft?md5=60ba0a3663eb4358fd0ea113a16421db&pid=1-s2.0-S092585742400185X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742400185X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) and soil bioengineering techniques have gained considerable attention due to their relevant hydrological functions and ability to mitigate slope instability. Live pole drains (LPD), a lesser-known NbS, have traditionally been deployed on slopes to drain the excess surface water and regulate the soil's water budget, making it a suitable technique for stormwater management and landslide prevention. However, neither the LPD performance as a plant-based drainage system nor its potential to regulate the soil-water budget through hydrological processes have been thoroughly studied. This paper presents a novel pilot, lab-based approach for testing the hydrological performance of LPD under different soil hydrological conditions. We built three different treatments and investigated their hydrological performance under multiple storm events. We explored how LPD regulate the soil-water budget by partitioning the water inputs (i.e., rainfall precipitation) into water outputs (i.e., surface runoff, subsurface flow, and percolation). The study revealed that LPD can effectively manage stormwater by draining excess runoff and buffering water in the soil, outperforming fallow soil. Subsurface flow and percolation were significantly higher under LPD treatments when compared to fallow ground, suggesting that the presence of an enhanced structure in the soil results in high soil hydrological performance. The presence of a secondary species with the LPD showed a more efficient hydrological performance than an LPD alone, which aligns with the current implementation of NbS fostering biodiversity. Antecedent soil moisture impacted the hydrological performance of LPD by altering the relative infiltration capacity of the soil and by potentially modifying the availability of channels for preferential flow. Our findings provide a sound basis for future research to improve our understanding of the hydrological performance of LPD for slope instability mitigation and encourage their reproduction and upscaling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试活杆排水沟(LPD)的水文性能以缓解斜坡不稳定性
基于自然的解决方案(NbS)和土壤生物工程技术因其相关的水文功能和缓解斜坡不稳定性的能力而备受关注。活杆排水沟(LPD)是一种不太为人所知的 NbS,传统上用于斜坡排水,以排出多余的地表水并调节土壤水分收支,是一种适用于雨水管理和滑坡预防的技术。然而,无论是 LPD 作为植物排水系统的性能,还是其通过水文过程调节土壤水分收支的潜力,都没有得到深入研究。本文介绍了一种新颖的试验性实验室方法,用于测试 LPD 在不同土壤水文条件下的水文性能。我们构建了三种不同的处理方法,并研究了它们在多种暴雨事件下的水文性能。我们探索了 LPD 如何通过将输入水量(即降雨量)分配为输出水量(即地表径流、地下水流和渗流)来调节土壤水分预算。研究结果表明,LPD 可以排出多余的径流并缓冲土壤中的水分,从而有效地管理雨水,其效果优于休耕土壤。与休耕地相比,LPD 处理下的地表下流和渗水量明显较高,这表明土壤中存在的强化结构可提高土壤的水文性能。与单独使用 LPD 相比,使用 LPD 的次生物种显示出更高效的水文性能,这与目前实施的促进生物多样性的 NbS 相一致。前土壤湿度通过改变土壤的相对渗透能力和潜在地改变优先流通道的可用性,对 LPD 的水文性能产生影响。我们的研究结果为今后的研究奠定了坚实的基础,有助于我们更好地了解用于缓解边坡不稳定性的 LPD 的水文性能,并鼓励其复制和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Effects of restorative treatments confirmed in a restored pond Living in a material world: Support for the use of natural and alternative materials in coastal restoration and living shorelines Editorial Board Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy Are floating mangrove breakwaters effective for wave attenuation? - A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1