F. Licciardello , S. Barresi , A. Marzo , A. Rizzo , L. Sciuto , D. Ventura , G.L. Cirelli
{"title":"Long term performance of Nature-Based Solutions as decentralized wastewater treatment: a case study of a retail store in southern Italy","authors":"F. Licciardello , S. Barresi , A. Marzo , A. Rizzo , L. Sciuto , D. Ventura , G.L. Cirelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this study is to evaluate the removal efficiency and the hydraulic behavior of the 10-year-old hybrid treatment wetland (TW) system treating effluents of the IKEA® store of Catania (Eastern Sicily, Italy), under Mediterranean semi-arid climate conditions. The system is placed downstream to the conventional wastewater (WW) treatment of the store, that includes a sequential batch reactor (SBR) followed by a horizontal subsurface treatment wetland (HF) unit and two vertical subsurface flow treatment wetlands (VF1 and VF2) units. The assessment of chemical, physical, and microbiological parameters in treated WW was carried out through regular monitoring activities, occurring approximately on a monthly basis, over a 8-year period spanning from 2016 to 2023. Up to 72 samples were collected for the following parameters measurements: total suspended solids (TSS), BOD<sub>5</sub>, COD, total phosphorus (TP), ammonia (as NH<sub>4</sub>), nitrate (as NO<sub>3</sub>-N), nitrite (as NO<sub>2</sub>-N), total nitrogen (TN) and <em>E. coli</em>. Hydraulic conductivity at saturation (<em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub>) measurements and tracer tests were conducted to evaluate the extent of clogging and to characterize the hydraulic behavior within the HF unit. Results obtained during the entire monitoring period show the following mean and standard errors (±) removal efficiency ranges (%): TN 21(±11)-80(±9); TSS 18(±42)-95(±3); COD 28(±23)-93(±2); BOD<sub>5</sub> 31(±10)-85(±44); TP 14(±6)-49(±19); NH<sub>4</sub> 50(±50)-95(±3); <em>E. coli</em> was abated with a mean range of 3.3(±0.2)-4.8(±0.4) Ulog reduction, reaching not detectable values in most samples analyzed since 2018. The efficacy of the treatment system is assessed in the context of both national and European regulatory frameworks governing effluent discharge and water reuse standards. <em>K</em><sub><em>s</em></sub> values and tracer test results agree in showing the progressive clogging of the HF unit influencing the hydraulic behavior of the unit giving useful on the management of TWs in Mediterranean area. Finally, the performance results also indicate that the overall treatment is not affected by the HF unit clogging.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 107459"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the removal efficiency and the hydraulic behavior of the 10-year-old hybrid treatment wetland (TW) system treating effluents of the IKEA® store of Catania (Eastern Sicily, Italy), under Mediterranean semi-arid climate conditions. The system is placed downstream to the conventional wastewater (WW) treatment of the store, that includes a sequential batch reactor (SBR) followed by a horizontal subsurface treatment wetland (HF) unit and two vertical subsurface flow treatment wetlands (VF1 and VF2) units. The assessment of chemical, physical, and microbiological parameters in treated WW was carried out through regular monitoring activities, occurring approximately on a monthly basis, over a 8-year period spanning from 2016 to 2023. Up to 72 samples were collected for the following parameters measurements: total suspended solids (TSS), BOD5, COD, total phosphorus (TP), ammonia (as NH4), nitrate (as NO3-N), nitrite (as NO2-N), total nitrogen (TN) and E. coli. Hydraulic conductivity at saturation (Ks) measurements and tracer tests were conducted to evaluate the extent of clogging and to characterize the hydraulic behavior within the HF unit. Results obtained during the entire monitoring period show the following mean and standard errors (±) removal efficiency ranges (%): TN 21(±11)-80(±9); TSS 18(±42)-95(±3); COD 28(±23)-93(±2); BOD5 31(±10)-85(±44); TP 14(±6)-49(±19); NH4 50(±50)-95(±3); E. coli was abated with a mean range of 3.3(±0.2)-4.8(±0.4) Ulog reduction, reaching not detectable values in most samples analyzed since 2018. The efficacy of the treatment system is assessed in the context of both national and European regulatory frameworks governing effluent discharge and water reuse standards. Ks values and tracer test results agree in showing the progressive clogging of the HF unit influencing the hydraulic behavior of the unit giving useful on the management of TWs in Mediterranean area. Finally, the performance results also indicate that the overall treatment is not affected by the HF unit clogging.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.