Laura Beth Kelly , Aixa Marchand , Laura Taylor , Cara Djonko-Moore
{"title":"US teacher opposition to so-called critical race theory bans","authors":"Laura Beth Kelly , Aixa Marchand , Laura Taylor , Cara Djonko-Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2024.104748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several states in the United States, including Tennessee, have enacted laws prohibiting so-called critical race theory in public schools. Positioning teachers as policy actors, this study examines how future and current teachers understand and plan to navigate Tennessee's legislation. In focus groups, participants disapproved of the legislation. They expressed active opposition, reluctant compliance, and intentional disregard. We theorize these responses as reflecting teachers' calculations regarding power in their contexts. Findings illustrate that teachers are not merely passive subjects enacting mandates, but instead intentionally and strategically interpret policy. The study has implications for global contexts in which teachers navigate censorship policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 104748"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X24002816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several states in the United States, including Tennessee, have enacted laws prohibiting so-called critical race theory in public schools. Positioning teachers as policy actors, this study examines how future and current teachers understand and plan to navigate Tennessee's legislation. In focus groups, participants disapproved of the legislation. They expressed active opposition, reluctant compliance, and intentional disregard. We theorize these responses as reflecting teachers' calculations regarding power in their contexts. Findings illustrate that teachers are not merely passive subjects enacting mandates, but instead intentionally and strategically interpret policy. The study has implications for global contexts in which teachers navigate censorship policies.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.