Sustainable conversion of agricultural waste into solid fuel (Charcoal) via gasification and pyrolysis treatment

IF 7.1 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Conversion and Management-X Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100693
Kantapong Khaeso , Bunyawat Sukhuna , Somporn Katekaew , Chaiyan Junsiri , Wiroon Monatrakul , Aphichat Srichat , Kritsadang Senawong , Kittipong Laloon
{"title":"Sustainable conversion of agricultural waste into solid fuel (Charcoal) via gasification and pyrolysis treatment","authors":"Kantapong Khaeso ,&nbsp;Bunyawat Sukhuna ,&nbsp;Somporn Katekaew ,&nbsp;Chaiyan Junsiri ,&nbsp;Wiroon Monatrakul ,&nbsp;Aphichat Srichat ,&nbsp;Kritsadang Senawong ,&nbsp;Kittipong Laloon","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Managing agricultural waste by burning it in the fields is a straightforward method, but leads to significant pollution. One promising alternative is to convert agricultural waste into solid fuel, such as charcoal, to support renewable energy from biomass. The quality of barbecue charcoal depends upon selecting suitable materials and employing heating methods to ensure efficient transformation. This research aims to study the charcoal conversion process from agricultural waste using two types of kilns: 1) direct heating (gasification kiln: GK) and 2) indirect heating (pyrolysis kiln: PK) designed to recirculate syngas from wood as fuel for the pyrolysis process. The study tested three types of agricultural waste materials, including coconut shells (CS), cassava rhizome (CR), and acacia wood (AW), to examine the differences in charcoal produced by the two heating methods. The tests revealed that the maximum temperatures inside the kilns were 792.45 ± 127.18 °C, 907.67 ± 37.3 °C, and 980.07 ± 110.56 °C for the GK, and 921.88 ± 57.84 °C, 801.93 ± 10.16 °C, and 937.82 ± 95.85 °C for the PK. The charcoal from the PK exhibited higher calorific values than the GK, with 7474.68 ± 36.62, 6429.04 ± 72.22, and 7268.33 ± 52.86 calories per gram. The charcoal yield was also higher in the PK, at 31.29 ± 4.39, 34.33 ± 3.39, and 17.58 ± 2.09 percent for coconut shells charcoal (CSC), cassava rhizome charcoal (CRC), and acacia wood charcoal (AWC), respectively. However, the PK required more fuel and longer ignition times. The resulting charcoal from the slow pyrolysis process in the PK is suitable as barbecue fuel due to its size, which is similar to the original material. In contrast, the charcoal from the GK, which tends to shrink or break into smaller pieces, is more suitable for grinding into briquettes. This study provides a guideline for producing high-quality barbecue charcoal, offering commercial benefits including the gasification and pyrolysis processes that improve combustion efficiency and reduce pollution by producing high-quality gas for fuel, unlike traditional kilns that emit a large amount of CO during the conversion of wood to charcoal and enabling the selection of appropriate raw materials for different heating methods to maximise the utility of the products. This approach adds value to agricultural raw materials and helps effectively manage agricultural waste (zero waste) for further utilisation and development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100693"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001715/pdfft?md5=3e312fa048e74fc7c6c57997ccaabcdc&pid=1-s2.0-S2590174524001715-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174524001715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing agricultural waste by burning it in the fields is a straightforward method, but leads to significant pollution. One promising alternative is to convert agricultural waste into solid fuel, such as charcoal, to support renewable energy from biomass. The quality of barbecue charcoal depends upon selecting suitable materials and employing heating methods to ensure efficient transformation. This research aims to study the charcoal conversion process from agricultural waste using two types of kilns: 1) direct heating (gasification kiln: GK) and 2) indirect heating (pyrolysis kiln: PK) designed to recirculate syngas from wood as fuel for the pyrolysis process. The study tested three types of agricultural waste materials, including coconut shells (CS), cassava rhizome (CR), and acacia wood (AW), to examine the differences in charcoal produced by the two heating methods. The tests revealed that the maximum temperatures inside the kilns were 792.45 ± 127.18 °C, 907.67 ± 37.3 °C, and 980.07 ± 110.56 °C for the GK, and 921.88 ± 57.84 °C, 801.93 ± 10.16 °C, and 937.82 ± 95.85 °C for the PK. The charcoal from the PK exhibited higher calorific values than the GK, with 7474.68 ± 36.62, 6429.04 ± 72.22, and 7268.33 ± 52.86 calories per gram. The charcoal yield was also higher in the PK, at 31.29 ± 4.39, 34.33 ± 3.39, and 17.58 ± 2.09 percent for coconut shells charcoal (CSC), cassava rhizome charcoal (CRC), and acacia wood charcoal (AWC), respectively. However, the PK required more fuel and longer ignition times. The resulting charcoal from the slow pyrolysis process in the PK is suitable as barbecue fuel due to its size, which is similar to the original material. In contrast, the charcoal from the GK, which tends to shrink or break into smaller pieces, is more suitable for grinding into briquettes. This study provides a guideline for producing high-quality barbecue charcoal, offering commercial benefits including the gasification and pyrolysis processes that improve combustion efficiency and reduce pollution by producing high-quality gas for fuel, unlike traditional kilns that emit a large amount of CO during the conversion of wood to charcoal and enabling the selection of appropriate raw materials for different heating methods to maximise the utility of the products. This approach adds value to agricultural raw materials and helps effectively manage agricultural waste (zero waste) for further utilisation and development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过气化和热解处理将农业废弃物可持续地转化为固体燃料(木炭
在田间焚烧农业废弃物是一种直接的管理方法,但会造成严重污染。将农业废弃物转化为木炭等固体燃料,支持从生物质中获取可再生能源,是一种很有前景的替代方法。烧烤木炭的质量取决于选择合适的材料和采用加热方法,以确保有效转化。本研究旨在利用两种类型的窑炉研究农业废弃物的木炭转化过程:1) 直接加热(气化窑:GK)和 2) 间接加热(热解窑:PK),旨在循环利用木材产生的合成气作为热解过程的燃料。该研究测试了三种农业废料,包括椰子壳(CS)、木薯根茎(CR)和相思木(AW),以检验两种加热方法产生的木炭的差异。试验表明,GK 窑内的最高温度分别为 792.45 ± 127.18 ℃、907.67 ± 37.3 ℃和 980.07 ± 110.56 ℃,而 PK 窑内的最高温度分别为 921.88 ± 57.84 ℃、801.93 ± 10.16 ℃和 937.82 ± 95.85 ℃。PK 的木炭热值高于 GK,分别为每克 7474.68 ± 36.62 卡路里、6429.04 ± 72.22 卡路里和 7268.33 ± 52.86 卡路里。PK 的出炭率也更高,椰壳炭(CSC)、木薯根茎炭(CRC)和金合欢木炭(AWC)的出炭率分别为 31.29 ± 4.39%、34.33 ± 3.39% 和 17.58 ± 2.09%。然而,PK 需要更多的燃料和更长的点火时间。在 PK 中缓慢热解过程产生的木炭由于其大小与原始材料相似,因此适合用作烧烤燃料。相比之下,来自 GK 的木炭容易收缩或碎裂成小块,更适合研磨成煤球。这项研究为生产优质烧烤木炭提供了指导,并带来了商业利益,包括气化和热解过程,与传统窑炉将木材转化为木炭的过程中排放大量二氧化碳不同,气化和热解过程通过生产优质气体作为燃料,提高了燃烧效率,减少了污染,并能为不同的加热方法选择合适的原材料,最大限度地发挥产品的效用。这种方法增加了农业原材料的价值,有助于有效管理农业废弃物(零废弃物),以便进一步利用和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
180
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability. The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.
期刊最新文献
Water desalination using waste heat recovery of thermal power plant in tropical climate; optimization by AI Thermal management performance of a novel elliptically grooved flat heat pipe system embedded with internally cooled condenser Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost of energy transport from Saudi Arabia with conventional fuels and liquefied natural gas Circulation of self-supplied water for significant energy recovery through heat integration A novel algorithm for optimizing genset operations to minimize fuel consumption in remote diesel-RES microgrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1