Artificial intelligence to automatically measure glenoid inclination, humeral alignment, and the lateralization and distalization shoulder angles on postoperative radiographs after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Q4 Medicine Seminars in Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1053/j.sart.2024.05.002
Linjun Yang PhD , Rodrigo de Marinis MD , Kristin Yu MD , Erick Marigi MD , Jacob F. Oeding MS , John W. Sperling Jr , Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD
{"title":"Artificial intelligence to automatically measure glenoid inclination, humeral alignment, and the lateralization and distalization shoulder angles on postoperative radiographs after reverse shoulder arthroplasty","authors":"Linjun Yang PhD ,&nbsp;Rodrigo de Marinis MD ,&nbsp;Kristin Yu MD ,&nbsp;Erick Marigi MD ,&nbsp;Jacob F. Oeding MS ,&nbsp;John W. Sperling Jr ,&nbsp;Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo MD, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Radiographic evaluation of the implant configuration after reverse shoulder arthroplasty<span> (RSA) is time-consuming and subject to interobserver disagreement. The final configuration is a combination of implant features and surgical execution. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been shown to perform accurate and efficient analysis of images. The purpose of this study was to develop an AI algorithm to automatically measure glenosphere inclination, humeral component inclination, and the lateralization and distalization shoulder angles (DSAs) on postoperative anteroposterior radiographs after RSA.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files corresponding to postoperative anteroposterior radiographs obtained after implantation of 143 RSAs were retrieved and used in this study. Four angles were analyzed: (1) glenoid inclination angle (GIA, between the central fixation feature of the glenoid and the floor of the supraspinatus fossa), (2) humeral alignment angle (HAA, between the long axis of the </span>humeral shaft and a perpendicular to the metallic bearing of the prosthesis), (3) DSA, and (4) lateralization shoulder angle (LSA). A UNet segmentation model was trained to segment bony and implant elements using manually segmented training (n = 89) and validation (n = 22) images. Then, an image-processing–based pipeline was developed to measure all 4 angles using AI-segmented images. Measures performed by 3 physician observers and the AI algorithm were then completed in 32 additional images. The agreements among human observers and between observers and the AI algorithm were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and absolute differences in degree.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ICCs (95% confidence interval) for manual measurements of LSA, DSA, GIA, and HAA were 0.79 (0.55, 0.90), 0.90 (0.80, 0.95), 0.96 (0.93, 0.98), and 0.99 (0.97, 0.99), respectively. The AI algorithm measured the 32 images in the test set in less than 2 minutes. The agreement between observers and the AI algorithm was lowest when measuring the LSA for observer 2, with an ICC of 0.77 (0.52, 0.89), and an absolute difference in degrees (median [interquartile range]) of 5 (4). Better agreements were found between the AI measurements and the average manual measurements: absolute differences in degree for LSA, DSA, GIA, and HAA were 3 (5), 2 (3), 2 (2), and 2 (1), respectively; ICCs for LSA, DSA, GIA, and HAA were 0.89 (0.79, 0.95), 0.96 (0.93, 0.98), 0.85 (0.68, 0.93), and 0.98 (0.95, 0.99), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The AI algorithm developed in this study can automatically measure the GIA, HAA, LSA, and DSA on postoperative anteroposterior radiographs obtained after implantation on RSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 779-788"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Radiographic evaluation of the implant configuration after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is time-consuming and subject to interobserver disagreement. The final configuration is a combination of implant features and surgical execution. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been shown to perform accurate and efficient analysis of images. The purpose of this study was to develop an AI algorithm to automatically measure glenosphere inclination, humeral component inclination, and the lateralization and distalization shoulder angles (DSAs) on postoperative anteroposterior radiographs after RSA.

Methods

The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files corresponding to postoperative anteroposterior radiographs obtained after implantation of 143 RSAs were retrieved and used in this study. Four angles were analyzed: (1) glenoid inclination angle (GIA, between the central fixation feature of the glenoid and the floor of the supraspinatus fossa), (2) humeral alignment angle (HAA, between the long axis of the humeral shaft and a perpendicular to the metallic bearing of the prosthesis), (3) DSA, and (4) lateralization shoulder angle (LSA). A UNet segmentation model was trained to segment bony and implant elements using manually segmented training (n = 89) and validation (n = 22) images. Then, an image-processing–based pipeline was developed to measure all 4 angles using AI-segmented images. Measures performed by 3 physician observers and the AI algorithm were then completed in 32 additional images. The agreements among human observers and between observers and the AI algorithm were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and absolute differences in degree.

Results

The ICCs (95% confidence interval) for manual measurements of LSA, DSA, GIA, and HAA were 0.79 (0.55, 0.90), 0.90 (0.80, 0.95), 0.96 (0.93, 0.98), and 0.99 (0.97, 0.99), respectively. The AI algorithm measured the 32 images in the test set in less than 2 minutes. The agreement between observers and the AI algorithm was lowest when measuring the LSA for observer 2, with an ICC of 0.77 (0.52, 0.89), and an absolute difference in degrees (median [interquartile range]) of 5 (4). Better agreements were found between the AI measurements and the average manual measurements: absolute differences in degree for LSA, DSA, GIA, and HAA were 3 (5), 2 (3), 2 (2), and 2 (1), respectively; ICCs for LSA, DSA, GIA, and HAA were 0.89 (0.79, 0.95), 0.96 (0.93, 0.98), 0.85 (0.68, 0.93), and 0.98 (0.95, 0.99), respectively.

Conclusion

The AI algorithm developed in this study can automatically measure the GIA, HAA, LSA, and DSA on postoperative anteroposterior radiographs obtained after implantation on RSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能自动测量反向肩关节置换术后X光片上的盂倾角、肱骨对齐情况以及肩关节外侧角和远侧角
背景反向肩关节置换术(RSA)后对植入物结构的放射影像学评估非常耗时,而且观察者之间的意见也不一致。最终配置是植入物特征和手术执行的综合结果。人工智能(AI)算法已被证明能对图像进行准确有效的分析。本研究的目的是开发一种人工智能算法,用于自动测量RSA术后前后位X光片上的盂唇倾角、肱骨组件倾角以及肩关节外侧化角和远端化角(DSAs)。方法本研究检索并使用了与植入143枚RSA后获得的术后前后位X光片相对应的医学数字成像和通信文件。研究分析了四个角度:(1)盂倾角(GIA,盂中央固定特征与冈上窝底面之间的角度),(2)肱骨对准角(HAA,肱骨轴长轴与假体金属轴承垂直线之间的角度),(3)DSA,(4)肩外侧角(LSA)。使用人工分割的训练图像(n = 89)和验证图像(n = 22)训练 UNet 分割模型来分割骨骼和假体元素。然后,开发了一个基于图像处理的管道,使用人工智能分割的图像测量所有 4 个角度。然后,由 3 名医生观察员和人工智能算法对另外 32 幅图像进行测量。结果人工测量 LSA、DSA、GIA 和 HAA 的 ICCs(95% 置信区间)分别为 0.79(0.55,0.90)、0.90(0.80,0.95)、0.96(0.93,0.98)和 0.99(0.97,0.99)。人工智能算法在不到 2 分钟的时间内测量了测试集中的 32 幅图像。在测量观察者 2 的 LSA 时,观察者与人工智能算法之间的一致性最低,ICC 为 0.77(0.52,0.89),度数的绝对差异(中位数[四分位间范围])为 5(4)。人工智能测量结果与平均人工测量结果之间的一致性更好:LSA、DSA、GIA 和 HAA 的绝对度数差异分别为 3 (5)、2 (3)、2 (2) 和 2 (1);LSA、DSA、GIA 和 HAA 的 ICC 分别为 0.89 (0.79, 0.95)、0.96(0.93,0.98)、0.85(0.68,0.93)和 0.98(0.95,0.99)。结论本研究开发的人工智能算法可以自动测量 RSA 植入术后正位片上的 GIA、HAA、LSA 和 DSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection with atypical wounds: a case series of 12 patients Artificial intelligence to automatically measure glenoid inclination, humeral alignment, and the lateralization and distalization shoulder angles on postoperative radiographs after reverse shoulder arthroplasty Impact of surgeon variability on outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 2188 surgeons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1