Comparison of physiological and clinical reactions to COVID-19 and influenza vaccination

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00588-7
Matan Yechezkel, Gary Qian, Yosi Levi, Nadav Davidovitch, Erez Shmueli, Dan Yamin, Margaret L. Brandeau
{"title":"Comparison of physiological and clinical reactions to COVID-19 and influenza vaccination","authors":"Matan Yechezkel, Gary Qian, Yosi Levi, Nadav Davidovitch, Erez Shmueli, Dan Yamin, Margaret L. Brandeau","doi":"10.1038/s43856-024-00588-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public reluctance to receive COVID-19 vaccination is associated with safety concerns. By contrast, the seasonal influenza vaccine has been administered for decades with a solid safety record and a high level of public acceptance. We compare the safety profile of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 booster vaccine to that of the seasonal influenza vaccine. We study a prospective cohort of 5079 participants in Israel and a retrospective cohort of 250,000 members of MHS selected randomly. We examine reactions to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 booster and to influenza vaccinations. All prospective cohort participants wore a smartwatch and completed a daily digital questionnaire. We compare pre-vaccination and post-vaccination smartwatch heart-rate data, and a stress measure based on heart-rate variability. We also examine adverse events from electronic health records. In the prospective cohort, 1905 participants receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine; 899 receive influenza vaccination. Focusing on those who receive both vaccines yields a total of 689 participants in the prospective cohort and 31,297 members in the retrospective cohort. Individuals reporting a more severe reaction after influenza vaccination tend to likewise report a more severe reaction after COVID-19 vaccination. In paired analysis, the increase in both heart rate and stress measure for each participant is higher for COVID-19 than for influenza in the first 2 days after vaccination. No elevated risk of hospitalization due to adverse events is found following either vaccine. Except for Bell’s palsy after influenza vaccination, no elevated risk of adverse events is found. The more pronounced side effects after COVID-19 vaccination may explain the greater concern associated with it. Nevertheless, our comprehensive analysis supports the safety profile of both vaccines. We compared the safety profiles of the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. We analyzed data from Israel involving 5079 participants who wore smartwatches and completed daily questionnaires, as well as electronic health records from 250,000 members of Maccabi Healthcare Services. We found that side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine were more noticeable, based on self-reported symptoms and heart measures (heart-rate and stress) detected by smartwatches. The increase in heart measures was higher after COVID-19 vaccination than after influenza vaccination in the first 2 days post-vaccination. However, electronic health records showed no increased risk of adverse events with the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. Our analysis supports the safety of both vaccines but may explain the greater concern about the COVID-19 vaccine. Yechezkel et al. compare the safety profiles of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 booster and the seasonal influenza vaccine using data from wearables, reported reactions, and electronic health records. Participants displayed increased heart rates and short-term stress measurements following COVID-19 boosters but overall safety of both vaccines is supported.","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00588-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-024-00588-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public reluctance to receive COVID-19 vaccination is associated with safety concerns. By contrast, the seasonal influenza vaccine has been administered for decades with a solid safety record and a high level of public acceptance. We compare the safety profile of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 booster vaccine to that of the seasonal influenza vaccine. We study a prospective cohort of 5079 participants in Israel and a retrospective cohort of 250,000 members of MHS selected randomly. We examine reactions to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 booster and to influenza vaccinations. All prospective cohort participants wore a smartwatch and completed a daily digital questionnaire. We compare pre-vaccination and post-vaccination smartwatch heart-rate data, and a stress measure based on heart-rate variability. We also examine adverse events from electronic health records. In the prospective cohort, 1905 participants receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine; 899 receive influenza vaccination. Focusing on those who receive both vaccines yields a total of 689 participants in the prospective cohort and 31,297 members in the retrospective cohort. Individuals reporting a more severe reaction after influenza vaccination tend to likewise report a more severe reaction after COVID-19 vaccination. In paired analysis, the increase in both heart rate and stress measure for each participant is higher for COVID-19 than for influenza in the first 2 days after vaccination. No elevated risk of hospitalization due to adverse events is found following either vaccine. Except for Bell’s palsy after influenza vaccination, no elevated risk of adverse events is found. The more pronounced side effects after COVID-19 vaccination may explain the greater concern associated with it. Nevertheless, our comprehensive analysis supports the safety profile of both vaccines. We compared the safety profiles of the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. We analyzed data from Israel involving 5079 participants who wore smartwatches and completed daily questionnaires, as well as electronic health records from 250,000 members of Maccabi Healthcare Services. We found that side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine were more noticeable, based on self-reported symptoms and heart measures (heart-rate and stress) detected by smartwatches. The increase in heart measures was higher after COVID-19 vaccination than after influenza vaccination in the first 2 days post-vaccination. However, electronic health records showed no increased risk of adverse events with the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines. Our analysis supports the safety of both vaccines but may explain the greater concern about the COVID-19 vaccine. Yechezkel et al. compare the safety profiles of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 booster and the seasonal influenza vaccine using data from wearables, reported reactions, and electronic health records. Participants displayed increased heart rates and short-term stress measurements following COVID-19 boosters but overall safety of both vaccines is supported.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 和流感疫苗接种的生理和临床反应比较
公众不愿意接种 COVID-19 与安全问题有关。相比之下,季节性流感疫苗已经接种了几十年,安全记录良好,公众接受度高。我们比较了 BNT162b2 COVID-19 强化疫苗与季节性流感疫苗的安全性。我们对以色列 5079 名参与者组成的前瞻性队列和随机抽取的 25 万名 MHS 会员组成的回顾性队列进行了研究。我们研究了对 BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 强化疫苗和流感疫苗的反应。所有前瞻性队列参与者都佩戴了智能手表,并填写了每日数字问卷。我们比较了接种前和接种后的智能手表心率数据以及基于心率变异性的压力测量值。我们还检查了电子健康记录中的不良事件。在前瞻性队列中,1905 名参与者接种了 COVID-19 加强型疫苗;899 人接种了流感疫苗。将重点放在同时接种两种疫苗的人群上,前瞻性队列中共有 689 名参与者,回顾性队列中共有 31,297 名成员。报告在接种流感疫苗后出现更严重反应的人往往也会在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后出现更严重的反应。在配对分析中,接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的头两天,每位参与者的心率和压力测量值的增加都高于流感疫苗。两种疫苗接种后都没有发现因不良事件导致的住院风险升高。除流感疫苗接种后出现贝尔麻痹外,未发现不良事件风险升高。接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的副作用更为明显,这可能是人们对其更为关注的原因。尽管如此,我们的综合分析支持两种疫苗的安全性。我们比较了 COVID-19 和流感疫苗的安全性。我们分析了来自以色列的 5079 名参与者的数据,这些参与者佩戴了智能手表并完成了每日问卷调查,我们还分析了马卡比医疗保健服务公司 25 万名成员的电子健康记录。我们发现,根据自我报告的症状和智能手表检测到的心脏指标(心率和压力),COVID-19 疫苗接种后的副作用更明显。在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的头两天,心脏指数的上升幅度高于接种流感疫苗后的上升幅度。然而,电子健康记录显示,接种 COVID-19 和流感疫苗后不良事件的风险并没有增加。我们的分析支持两种疫苗的安全性,但这可能解释了为什么人们更关注 COVID-19 疫苗。Yechezkel等人利用可穿戴设备、报告的反应和电子健康记录中的数据,比较了BNT162b2 COVID-19加强剂和季节性流感疫苗的安全性。参与者在接种 COVID-19 加强剂后心率和短期压力测量值都有所上升,但两种疫苗的总体安全性都得到了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Correction: A cross-sectional and population-based study from primary care on post-COVID-19 conditions in non-hospitalized patients An integrated empirical and computational study to decipher help-seeking behaviors and vocal stigma Survey of the risk behaviors and mental health of adolescents in Gabon risky behaviors and vulnerability of adolescent Africans Inclusiveness of the All of Us Research Program improves polygenic risk scores and fosters genomic medicine for all Recommendations for the equitable integration of digital health interventions across the HIV care cascade
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1