Exploring alkali-treated corn cob for high-rate removal of NOX and SO2 from flue gas: Focus on carbon release capacity, removal performance, and comparison with conventional carbon sources.

Journal of hazardous materials Pub Date : 2024-10-05 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135613
Yao Lu, Biaojun Zhang, Ying Cao, Yanling Wang, Yongqing Zhang, Shaobin Huang
{"title":"Exploring alkali-treated corn cob for high-rate removal of NO<sub>X</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from flue gas: Focus on carbon release capacity, removal performance, and comparison with conventional carbon sources.","authors":"Yao Lu, Biaojun Zhang, Ying Cao, Yanling Wang, Yongqing Zhang, Shaobin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigation explored the potential of utilizing alkali-treated corn cob (CC) as a solid carbon source to improve NO<sub>X</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> removal from flue gas. Leaching experiments unveiled a hierarchy of chemical oxygen demand release capacity: 0.03 mol/L alkali-treated CC > 0.02 mol/L > 0.01 mol/L > 0.005 mol/L > control. In NO<sub>X</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> removal experiments, as the inlet NO<sub>X</sub> concentration rose from 300 to 1000 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, the average NO<sub>X</sub> removal efficiency increased from 58.56 % to 80.00 %. Conversely, SO<sub>2</sub> removal efficiency decreased from 99.96 % to 91.05 %, but swiftly rebounded to 98.56 % by day 18. The accumulation of N intermediates (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>) increased with escalating inlet NO<sub>X</sub> concentration, while the accumulation of S intermediates (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, SO<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>, S<sup>0</sup>) varied based on shifts in the population of functional bacteria. The elevation in inlet NO<sub>X</sub> concentration stimulated the growth of denitrifying bacteria, enhancing NO<sub>X</sub> removal efficiency. Concurrently, the population of nitrate-reducing sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria expanded, aiding in the accumulation of S<sup>0</sup> and the removal of SO<sub>2</sub>. The comparison experiments on carbon sources confirmed the comparable NO<sub>X</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> removal efficiencies of alkali-treated CC and glucose, yet underscored differences in intermediates accumulation due to distinct genus structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This investigation explored the potential of utilizing alkali-treated corn cob (CC) as a solid carbon source to improve NOX and SO2 removal from flue gas. Leaching experiments unveiled a hierarchy of chemical oxygen demand release capacity: 0.03 mol/L alkali-treated CC > 0.02 mol/L > 0.01 mol/L > 0.005 mol/L > control. In NOX and SO2 removal experiments, as the inlet NOX concentration rose from 300 to 1000 mg/m3, the average NOX removal efficiency increased from 58.56 % to 80.00 %. Conversely, SO2 removal efficiency decreased from 99.96 % to 91.05 %, but swiftly rebounded to 98.56 % by day 18. The accumulation of N intermediates (NH4+, NO3-, NO2-) increased with escalating inlet NOX concentration, while the accumulation of S intermediates (SO42-, SO32-, S0) varied based on shifts in the population of functional bacteria. The elevation in inlet NOX concentration stimulated the growth of denitrifying bacteria, enhancing NOX removal efficiency. Concurrently, the population of nitrate-reducing sulfur-oxidizing bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria expanded, aiding in the accumulation of S0 and the removal of SO2. The comparison experiments on carbon sources confirmed the comparable NOX and SO2 removal efficiencies of alkali-treated CC and glucose, yet underscored differences in intermediates accumulation due to distinct genus structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索碱处理玉米芯对烟道气中 NOX 和 SO2 的高去除率:重点关注碳释放能力、去除性能以及与传统碳源的比较。
这项研究探索了利用碱处理过的玉米芯(CC)作为固体碳源来改善烟道气中氮氧化物和二氧化硫去除效果的潜力。浸出实验揭示了化学需氧量释放能力的等级:0.03 mol/L 碱处理过的 CC > 0.02 mol/L > 0.01 mol/L > 0.005 mol/L > 对照组。在去除 NOX 和 SO2 的实验中,当入口 NOX 浓度从 300 mg/m3 上升到 1000 mg/m3 时,NOX 的平均去除率从 58.56 % 上升到 80.00 %。相反,二氧化硫的去除率从 99.96% 下降到 91.05%,但到第 18 天又迅速回升到 98.56%。N 中间产物(NH4+、NO3-、NO2-)的积累随着入口 NOX 浓度的增加而增加,而 S 中间产物(SO42-、SO32-、S0)的积累则根据功能细菌数量的变化而变化。入口氮氧化物浓度的增加刺激了反硝化细菌的生长,提高了氮氧化物的去除效率。同时,硝酸盐还原硫氧化细菌和硫酸盐还原细菌的数量增加,有助于 S0 的积累和 SO2 的去除。碳源对比实验证实,碱处理 CC 和葡萄糖对氮氧化物和二氧化硫的去除效率相当,但由于不同的菌属结构,中间产物的积累也存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Protaetia brevitarsis larvae produce frass that can be used as an additive to immobilize Cd and improve fertility in alkaline soils" [J Hazard Mater 474 (2024) 134379]. High-efficiency removal of microcystis aeruginosa using Z-scheme AgBr/NH2-MIL-125(Ti) photocatalyst with superior visible-light absorption: Performance insights and mechanisms. Atmospheric reactive nitrogen conversion kicks off the co-directional and contra-directional effects on PM2.5-O3 pollution. Disentangling external loadings, hydrodynamics and biogeochemical controls on the fate of nitrate in a coastal embayment. Enhancement of fine particle removal through flue gas cooling in a spray tower with packing materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1