Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Think. Test. Treat TB Health Communications Campaign, United States, March-September 2022.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1177/00333549241268644
Elise Caruso, John Parmer, Leeanna Allen, Allison Maiuri, Joan Mangan, Beth Bouwkamp, Nickolas DeLuca
{"title":"Process and Outcome Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's <i>Think. Test. Treat TB</i> Health Communications Campaign, United States, March-September 2022.","authors":"Elise Caruso, John Parmer, Leeanna Allen, Allison Maiuri, Joan Mangan, Beth Bouwkamp, Nickolas DeLuca","doi":"10.1177/00333549241268644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The <i>Think. Test. Treat TB</i> health communications campaign aims to increase the awareness of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) primarily among people born in the Philippines and Vietnam and other non-US-born groups (consumers) and the health care providers (providers) who serve them. We conducted a process evaluation to assess reach and audience engagement and an outcome evaluation to assess awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and behavioral intentions among audiences of the campaign.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To evaluate the process, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention measured exposure to (eg, with impressions [total advertisements]) and engagement with (eg, online clicks) the campaign during its rollout (March-September 2022). After the rollout, to evaluate outcomes, we administered online surveys to consumers and providers who were exposed and not exposed to the campaign.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>Think. Test. Treat TB</i> campaign resulted in >33 million impressions, >2000 materials downloaded from the internet, and >33 000 materials shipped. Of 173 consumers who completed the evaluation survey, 123 (71.1%) were exposed to the campaign, with 108 (87.8%) reporting intention to ask their provider about tuberculosis (TB) during their next visit. Of 44 providers who completed the evaluation survey, 24 (54.5%) did not feel that they were the intended audience of the campaign, yet all felt the campaign materials were relevant to their patients, and 42 (95.5%) felt the materials were relevant to providers who serve patients at risk for TB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The <i>Think. Test. Treat TB</i> campaign was successful in raising awareness of LTBI among the intended audiences. Continuing engagement with key audiences about LTBI to encourage testing and treatment is integral to eliminate TB in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549241268644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Think. Test. Treat TB health communications campaign aims to increase the awareness of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) primarily among people born in the Philippines and Vietnam and other non-US-born groups (consumers) and the health care providers (providers) who serve them. We conducted a process evaluation to assess reach and audience engagement and an outcome evaluation to assess awareness, knowledge, perceptions, and behavioral intentions among audiences of the campaign.

Methods: To evaluate the process, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention measured exposure to (eg, with impressions [total advertisements]) and engagement with (eg, online clicks) the campaign during its rollout (March-September 2022). After the rollout, to evaluate outcomes, we administered online surveys to consumers and providers who were exposed and not exposed to the campaign.

Results: The Think. Test. Treat TB campaign resulted in >33 million impressions, >2000 materials downloaded from the internet, and >33 000 materials shipped. Of 173 consumers who completed the evaluation survey, 123 (71.1%) were exposed to the campaign, with 108 (87.8%) reporting intention to ask their provider about tuberculosis (TB) during their next visit. Of 44 providers who completed the evaluation survey, 24 (54.5%) did not feel that they were the intended audience of the campaign, yet all felt the campaign materials were relevant to their patients, and 42 (95.5%) felt the materials were relevant to providers who serve patients at risk for TB.

Conclusion: The Think. Test. Treat TB campaign was successful in raising awareness of LTBI among the intended audiences. Continuing engagement with key audiences about LTBI to encourage testing and treatment is integral to eliminate TB in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对美国疾病控制和预防中心的 "思考 "项目进行过程和结果评估。测试。治疗结核病健康传播运动,美国,2022 年 3 月至 9 月。
目标:思考。测试。治疗结核病 "健康传播活动旨在主要提高菲律宾和越南出生的人以及其他非美国出生的群体(消费者)和为他们提供服务的医疗服务提供者(提供者)对潜伏肺结核感染(LTBI)的认识。我们进行了过程评估,以评估覆盖范围和受众参与度;还进行了结果评估,以评估受众对该活动的认识、知识、看法和行为意向:为了对过程进行评估,疾病控制与预防中心测量了活动开展期间(2022 年 3 月至 9 月)的接触率(如广告印象[广告总量])和参与率(如在线点击率)。活动结束后,为了评估结果,我们对接触和未接触该活动的消费者和医疗服务提供者进行了在线调查:结果:"思考。结果:Think.结果:"思考、测试、治疗 "结核病宣传活动产生了超过 3300 万次印象,从互联网上下载了超过 2000 份资料,并运送了超过 33000 份资料。在完成评估调查的 173 名消费者中,123 人(71.1%)接触过该活动,108 人(87.8%)表示有意在下次就诊时向医疗服务提供者询问有关结核病(TB)的问题。在 44 位完成评估调查的医疗服务提供者中,有 24 位(54.5%)认为自己不是该活动的目标受众,但他们都认为活动材料与他们的患者相关,42 位(95.5%)认为材料与为结核病高危患者提供服务的医疗服务提供者相关:结论:"思考。结论:"思考。结论:Think.继续与主要受众开展有关 LTBI 的活动,鼓励他们进行检测和治疗,对于在美国消除结核病是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Reports
Public Health Reports 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
期刊最新文献
Wastewater Surveillance of US Coast Guard Installations and Seagoing Military Vessels to Mitigate the Risk of COVID-19 Outbreaks, March 2021-August 2022. Advancing Evidence-Based Public Health Policy: How Core Component Thinking Can Illuminate the Multilevel Nature of Public Health Policy. Associations Between Social Networks and COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in 4 Rural Alabama Counties: Survey Findings. Community Engagement, Equity, and Cross-Sector Public Health Practice. Disparities in Smoking and Heavy Drinking Behaviors by Disability Status and Age of Disability Onset: Secondary Analysis of National Health Interview Survey Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1