Assessing Communication Competencies in Canadian MPH Program Curriculum: A Content Analysis of Communication Courses.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Reports Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1177/00333549241308524
Melissa MacKay, Devon McAlpine, Lauren E Grant, Andrew Papadopoulos, Jennifer E McWhirter
{"title":"Assessing Communication Competencies in Canadian MPH Program Curriculum: A Content Analysis of Communication Courses.","authors":"Melissa MacKay, Devon McAlpine, Lauren E Grant, Andrew Papadopoulos, Jennifer E McWhirter","doi":"10.1177/00333549241308524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Communication plays a pivotal role in addressing modern and complex public health challenges. Our study assessed the extent to which communication-related course outlines in Canadian master of public health (MPH) programs aligned with national and international public health competency frameworks in their coverage of communication competencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an environmental scan and content analysis of MPH courses relevant to public health communication in 2022 and 2023. We used university and program websites and Google to conduct initial searches and obtain course outlines, supplementing these searches with a survey. We developed a codebook based on public health competencies and pedagogical best practices, capturing variables for communication competencies, audiences, channels, tools, and techniques. Two researchers independently coded course outlines. Descriptive statistics evaluated how these courses address communication-related public health competencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained 11 course outlines offered from 2010 through 2023. The focus of the included courses varied, with health communication (n = 3), knowledge mobilization (n = 3), and risk and/or crisis communication (n = 2) being the most common. All courses broadly aligned with communication competencies related to communication with different audiences (n = 11), and mobilizing (n = 9), interpreting (n = 11), tailoring (n = 9), and facilitating (n = 9) communication. Using technology (n = 4) and media (n = 6), addressing mis/disinformation (n = 1), and communicating with diverse audiences (n = 3) had less alignment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings revealed gaps in the coverage of key competencies, particularly in addressing mis/disinformation, leveraging technology and media, communicating with diverse populations, health literacy, and crisis communication. Ongoing review of curriculum would ensure alignment with evolving competencies and public health demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":20793,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Reports","volume":" ","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549241308524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Communication plays a pivotal role in addressing modern and complex public health challenges. Our study assessed the extent to which communication-related course outlines in Canadian master of public health (MPH) programs aligned with national and international public health competency frameworks in their coverage of communication competencies.

Methods: We conducted an environmental scan and content analysis of MPH courses relevant to public health communication in 2022 and 2023. We used university and program websites and Google to conduct initial searches and obtain course outlines, supplementing these searches with a survey. We developed a codebook based on public health competencies and pedagogical best practices, capturing variables for communication competencies, audiences, channels, tools, and techniques. Two researchers independently coded course outlines. Descriptive statistics evaluated how these courses address communication-related public health competencies.

Results: We obtained 11 course outlines offered from 2010 through 2023. The focus of the included courses varied, with health communication (n = 3), knowledge mobilization (n = 3), and risk and/or crisis communication (n = 2) being the most common. All courses broadly aligned with communication competencies related to communication with different audiences (n = 11), and mobilizing (n = 9), interpreting (n = 11), tailoring (n = 9), and facilitating (n = 9) communication. Using technology (n = 4) and media (n = 6), addressing mis/disinformation (n = 1), and communicating with diverse audiences (n = 3) had less alignment.

Conclusions: Findings revealed gaps in the coverage of key competencies, particularly in addressing mis/disinformation, leveraging technology and media, communicating with diverse populations, health literacy, and crisis communication. Ongoing review of curriculum would ensure alignment with evolving competencies and public health demands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估加拿大公共卫生硕士课程的沟通能力:沟通课程的内容分析。
目标:沟通在应对现代复杂的公共卫生挑战方面发挥着关键作用。我们的研究评估了加拿大公共卫生硕士(MPH)项目中与沟通相关的课程大纲与国家和国际公共卫生能力框架在沟通能力覆盖方面的一致性程度。方法:对2022年和2023年公共卫生传播相关硕士课程进行环境扫描和内容分析。我们使用大学和项目网站以及谷歌进行初步搜索,获取课程大纲,并辅以调查。我们根据公共卫生能力和教学最佳实践开发了一本代码本,获取了沟通能力、受众、渠道、工具和技术的变量。两名研究人员独立编写课程大纲。描述性统计评估了这些课程如何处理与通信相关的公共卫生能力。结果:我们获得了从2010年到2023年提供的11个课程大纲。所包括课程的重点各不相同,其中最常见的是健康沟通(n = 3)、知识动员(n = 3)和风险和/或危机沟通(n = 2)。所有课程都大致与与不同受众(n = 11)、动员(n = 9)、解释(n = 11)、裁剪(n = 9)和促进(n = 9)沟通能力相关。使用技术(n = 4)和媒体(n = 6),处理错误/虚假信息(n = 1),与不同的受众沟通(n = 3)的一致性较低。结论:调查结果显示,关键能力的覆盖范围存在差距,特别是在处理信息管理信息/虚假信息、利用技术和媒体、与不同人群沟通、卫生素养和危机沟通方面。正在进行的课程审查将确保与不断变化的能力和公共卫生需求保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Reports
Public Health Reports 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, original research, public health law, and public health schools and teaching. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal''s contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format.
期刊最新文献
Translating Rigorous Science Into Effective Policy: Bridging the Gap. The Benefits of Community-Level Efforts to Increase Tree Shade Availability for Cancer Prevention and Control. Reflections on a Tribal-Federal Response to a Syphilis Outbreak. Evaluation of the Newborn Metabolic Screening Form for Surveillance of Postpartum Patients for Hepatitis B Infection in New York City, 2019-2022. Ticks in the Tropics: Challenging the Myth of a Lyme-Less Florida.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1