The corrosion products of proprietary and generic orthodontic fixed lingual retainers and their in-vitro cytotoxicity.

Nessa A Finlay, Lam Cheng, Elizabeth Kelly, Peter Petocz, Narayan Gandedkar, Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, Oyku Dalci
{"title":"The corrosion products of proprietary and generic orthodontic fixed lingual retainers and their in-vitro cytotoxicity.","authors":"Nessa A Finlay, Lam Cheng, Elizabeth Kelly, Peter Petocz, Narayan Gandedkar, Mehmet Ali Darendeliler, Oyku Dalci","doi":"10.2319/112823-788.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the corrosion products and cytotoxicity of generic and proprietary fixed lingual retainers (FLRs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven FLRs were investigated. Wires were submersed in solution for 34 days, at 37°C, under constant agitation. A proportion of this solution was analyzed to determine the concentration of metallic ions leaching off the wires. The remainder was diluted to 5%, 10% and 20% followed by exposure to human gingival fibroblasts and analysis of cytotoxicity of the wires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three wires (Dentaflex, Universal, and AZDent) released excessive concentrations of lead, two wires (MeshMark and Orthoflex) released excessive concentrations of nickel, and one wire (Universal) released excessive concentrations of molybdenum into solution. No statistically significant difference was found between the wires analyzed (P = .24). Slight cytotoxicity was noted in only one wire (Dentaflex) at a 20% dilution of eluent. This was also the wire which released the highest concentration of lead into solution. All other wires, at all concentrations, were deemed noncytotoxic, but five samples overall were deemed statistically significant (P < .0024). A statistically significant difference existed between wires (P = .013) and concentrations analyzed (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Metals were released in differing quantities from all wires, with some elemental concentrations measuring more than that deemed acceptable in drinking water in Australia. A trend toward increased cell viability across samples was found with only one demonstrating cytotoxicity. There was no indication that generic FLRs were more or less biocompatible than their proprietary counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"664-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/112823-788.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the corrosion products and cytotoxicity of generic and proprietary fixed lingual retainers (FLRs).

Materials and methods: Seven FLRs were investigated. Wires were submersed in solution for 34 days, at 37°C, under constant agitation. A proportion of this solution was analyzed to determine the concentration of metallic ions leaching off the wires. The remainder was diluted to 5%, 10% and 20% followed by exposure to human gingival fibroblasts and analysis of cytotoxicity of the wires.

Results: Three wires (Dentaflex, Universal, and AZDent) released excessive concentrations of lead, two wires (MeshMark and Orthoflex) released excessive concentrations of nickel, and one wire (Universal) released excessive concentrations of molybdenum into solution. No statistically significant difference was found between the wires analyzed (P = .24). Slight cytotoxicity was noted in only one wire (Dentaflex) at a 20% dilution of eluent. This was also the wire which released the highest concentration of lead into solution. All other wires, at all concentrations, were deemed noncytotoxic, but five samples overall were deemed statistically significant (P < .0024). A statistically significant difference existed between wires (P = .013) and concentrations analyzed (P < .001).

Conclusions: Metals were released in differing quantities from all wires, with some elemental concentrations measuring more than that deemed acceptable in drinking water in Australia. A trend toward increased cell viability across samples was found with only one demonstrating cytotoxicity. There was no indication that generic FLRs were more or less biocompatible than their proprietary counterparts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专利和普通正畸固定舌侧保持器的腐蚀产物及其体外细胞毒性。
目的:评估普通和专有固定舌侧固位体(FLR)的腐蚀产物和细胞毒性:评估普通和专有固定舌侧固位体(FLR)的腐蚀产物和细胞毒性:对七种舌侧固定器进行了研究。导线在 37°C 溶液中浸泡 34 天,并不断搅拌。对其中一部分溶液进行分析,以确定金属离子从钢丝上析出的浓度。将剩余部分稀释至 5%、10% 和 20%,然后将其暴露于人类牙龈成纤维细胞,并分析金属丝的细胞毒性:结果:三种金属丝(Dentaflex、Universal 和 AZDent)在溶液中释放出过量的铅,两种金属丝(MeshMark 和 Orthoflex)释放出过量的镍,一种金属丝(Universal)释放出过量的钼。所分析的金属丝之间没有发现明显的统计学差异(P = .24)。只有一种金属丝(Dentaflex)在洗脱液稀释 20% 时出现轻微的细胞毒性。这也是向溶液中释放铅浓度最高的金属丝。所有其他金属丝在所有浓度下均被认为无细胞毒性,但有五个样本被认为具有统计学意义(P < .0024)。不同电线(P = .013)和不同分析浓度(P < .001)之间存在明显的统计学差异:结论:所有金属丝都释放了不同数量的金属,其中一些元素的浓度超过了澳大利亚饮用水中可接受的浓度。在所有样本中,发现了细胞活力增强的趋势,只有一个样本显示出细胞毒性。没有迹象表明通用 FLR 的生物相容性优于或劣于专有同类产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eruptive path of maxillary canines in patients with lateral incisor agenesis: a longitudinal follow-up. Which orthodontic articles are accessed online the most? Exploring article usage metrics along with citations and altmetrics. Three-dimensional assessment of the nasopharyngeal airway in Down syndrome during the mixed dentition period: a case-control study. Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in mandibular central incisors with an initial series of Invisalign aligners: a retrospective cohort study. An in vitro study of a combined patient-specific device for safe and accurate insertion of infrazygomatic crest miniscrews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1