Pressure pain threshold of the whole foot: Protocol and dense 3D sensitivity map

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104372
{"title":"Pressure pain threshold of the whole foot: Protocol and dense 3D sensitivity map","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When designing footwear products, designers and kinesiologists usually factor in plantar surface pressure, motion capture data, and subjective comfort evaluations. However, these factors alone are not sufficient to guide the design of truly comfortable shoes. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a parameter that establishes a connection between psychological quantities and physical quantities. The purpose of this study was to construct a high-precision PPT map of the whole foot. Overall, 20 participants were included in this study, and an electronic, mechanical algometer was used to apply constant pressure to the participants' feet. A MATLAB graphical user interface was developed to simplify the data-collecting process and generate visual representations of the data. Finally, several high-precision unisex, different sex, and dominant side PPT maps were generated. The findings revealed that the foot dorsum area and the medial foot region exhibited the lowest PPTs (indicative of high sensitivity). Notably, the foot dorsum area near the toes displayed the highest pain sensitivity (indicative of the lowest PPT), while the plantar area demonstrated comparatively lower pain sensitivity. The heel area exhibited the lowest pain sensitivity. Simultaneously, the study observed that women's feet exhibited lower pain thresholds than men's. In the future, it is imperative to delve deeper into the correlation between short-term pain sensitivity and the daily, long-term exercise state, as well as other physiological data. This exploration will contribute to a more nuanced guide for footwear comfort design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024001492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When designing footwear products, designers and kinesiologists usually factor in plantar surface pressure, motion capture data, and subjective comfort evaluations. However, these factors alone are not sufficient to guide the design of truly comfortable shoes. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a parameter that establishes a connection between psychological quantities and physical quantities. The purpose of this study was to construct a high-precision PPT map of the whole foot. Overall, 20 participants were included in this study, and an electronic, mechanical algometer was used to apply constant pressure to the participants' feet. A MATLAB graphical user interface was developed to simplify the data-collecting process and generate visual representations of the data. Finally, several high-precision unisex, different sex, and dominant side PPT maps were generated. The findings revealed that the foot dorsum area and the medial foot region exhibited the lowest PPTs (indicative of high sensitivity). Notably, the foot dorsum area near the toes displayed the highest pain sensitivity (indicative of the lowest PPT), while the plantar area demonstrated comparatively lower pain sensitivity. The heel area exhibited the lowest pain sensitivity. Simultaneously, the study observed that women's feet exhibited lower pain thresholds than men's. In the future, it is imperative to delve deeper into the correlation between short-term pain sensitivity and the daily, long-term exercise state, as well as other physiological data. This exploration will contribute to a more nuanced guide for footwear comfort design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整个足部的压痛阈值:规程和高密度三维敏感度图
在设计鞋类产品时,设计师和运动学家通常会考虑足底表面压力、运动捕捉数据和主观舒适度评估。然而,仅凭这些因素还不足以指导设计出真正舒适的鞋子。压力痛阈值(PPT)是一个在心理量和物理量之间建立联系的参数。本研究的目的是构建一个高精度的全足压力痛阈值图。共有 20 名参与者参与了这项研究,研究人员使用电子机械式压力计对参与者的双脚施加恒定压力。我们开发了一个 MATLAB 图形用户界面,以简化数据收集过程并生成可视化的数据表示。最后,生成了几张高精度的单性别、异性和优势侧 PPT 地图。研究结果显示,足背区域和足内侧区域的 PPT 值最低(表明灵敏度高)。值得注意的是,靠近脚趾的足背区域显示出最高的疼痛敏感度(表明 PPT 最低),而足底区域显示出相对较低的疼痛敏感度。脚跟部位的疼痛敏感度最低。同时,研究还发现女性脚部的疼痛阈值低于男性。今后,必须深入研究短期疼痛敏感性与日常、长期运动状态以及其他生理数据之间的相关性。这种探索将有助于为鞋类舒适性设计提供更细致的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
No one left behind: A universal design analysis of ship evacuation Combining visual cues with relaxing music, perfume and ventilation to reduce passenger car sickness: An experimental study Including the ergonomist's voice in integrating MSD prevention and psychological health and safety: Challenges, tools, and considerations Quantitative analysis of facial shape in children to support respirator design Different forms of fablab organization and their impact on collaboration and innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1