Luana S Soares, Aureliano Bombarelly, Loreta B Freitas
{"title":"How many species are there? Lineage diversification and hidden speciation in Solanaceae from highland grasslands in southern South America.","authors":"Luana S Soares, Aureliano Bombarelly, Loreta B Freitas","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Species delimitation can be challenging when analysing recently diverged species, especially those taxonomically synonymised due to morphological similarities. We aimed to untangle the relationships between two grassland species, Petunia guarapuavensis and Petunia scheideana, exploring the dynamics of fast divergence and addressing their species delimitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a low-coverage genome sequencing and population genomic approach to distinguish species and populations between P. guarapuavensis and P. scheideana. Our analysis focused on detecting structuration, hybridisation/introgression, and phylogenetic patterns. We employed demographic models to support species delimitation while exploring potential phylogeographic barriers influencing gene flow.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Our findings indicated differentiation between the two species and revealed another lineage, which was phylogenetically distinct from the others and had no evidence of gene flow with them. The presence of a river acted as a phylogeographic barrier, limiting gene flow and allowing for structuration between closely related lineages. The optimal species delimitation scenario involved secondary contact between well-established lineages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rapid divergence observed in these Petunia species explains the lack of significant morphological differences, as floral diagnostic traits in species sharing the pollinators tend to evolve more slowly. This study highlights the complexity of species delimitation in recently diverged groups and emphasises the importance of genomic approaches in understanding evolutionary relationships and speciation dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Species delimitation can be challenging when analysing recently diverged species, especially those taxonomically synonymised due to morphological similarities. We aimed to untangle the relationships between two grassland species, Petunia guarapuavensis and Petunia scheideana, exploring the dynamics of fast divergence and addressing their species delimitation.
Methods: We used a low-coverage genome sequencing and population genomic approach to distinguish species and populations between P. guarapuavensis and P. scheideana. Our analysis focused on detecting structuration, hybridisation/introgression, and phylogenetic patterns. We employed demographic models to support species delimitation while exploring potential phylogeographic barriers influencing gene flow.
Key results: Our findings indicated differentiation between the two species and revealed another lineage, which was phylogenetically distinct from the others and had no evidence of gene flow with them. The presence of a river acted as a phylogeographic barrier, limiting gene flow and allowing for structuration between closely related lineages. The optimal species delimitation scenario involved secondary contact between well-established lineages.
Conclusions: The rapid divergence observed in these Petunia species explains the lack of significant morphological differences, as floral diagnostic traits in species sharing the pollinators tend to evolve more slowly. This study highlights the complexity of species delimitation in recently diverged groups and emphasises the importance of genomic approaches in understanding evolutionary relationships and speciation dynamics.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide.
The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.