Differential tissue distribution of pharmaceuticals in a wild subtropical marine fish

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Aquatic Toxicology Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107064
{"title":"Differential tissue distribution of pharmaceuticals in a wild subtropical marine fish","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To date, the presence of pharmaceuticals has been extensively documented across a wide range of aquatic systems and biota. Further, substantial progress has been made in transitioning from laboratory assessments of pharmaceutical fate and effects in fish to <em>in situ</em> assessments of exposure and effects; however, certain research areas remain understudied. Among these is investigation of differential accumulation across multiple internal tissues in wild marine fish beyond the species commonly sampled in laboratory and freshwater field settings. This study examined the presence of pharmaceuticals across four tissues (plasma, muscle, brain, and liver) in a wild marine fish, bonefish (<em>Albula vulpes</em>), throughout coastal South Florida, USA. Differential accumulation across tissues was assessed for the number and concentration, identity, and composition of accumulated pharmaceuticals by sampling 25 bonefish and analyzing them for 91 pharmaceuticals. The concentration of pharmaceuticals was highest in plasma &gt; liver &gt; brain &gt; muscle, while the number of pharmaceuticals was highest in liver &gt; brain &gt; plasma &gt; muscle. The identity of detected pharmaceuticals was tissue specific, and there was an inverse relationship between the number of detections for each pharmaceutical and its log K<sub>ow</sub>. The composition of pharmaceuticals was tissue specific for both pharmaceutical presence/absence and concentration. Across all tissues, the greatest similarity was between brain and liver, which were more similar to plasma than to muscle, and muscle was the most distinct tissue. For tissue compositional variability, muscle was the most diverse in accumulated pharmaceuticals, while plasma, brain, and liver were similarly variable. With the highest concentrations in plasma and highest number in liver, and documented variability in accumulated pharmaceuticals across tissues, our results highlight the importance of tissue selection when surveying exposure in wild fish, suggesting that multi-tissue analysis would allow for a more comprehensive assessment of exposure diversity and risk of adverse effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":248,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166445X24002340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, the presence of pharmaceuticals has been extensively documented across a wide range of aquatic systems and biota. Further, substantial progress has been made in transitioning from laboratory assessments of pharmaceutical fate and effects in fish to in situ assessments of exposure and effects; however, certain research areas remain understudied. Among these is investigation of differential accumulation across multiple internal tissues in wild marine fish beyond the species commonly sampled in laboratory and freshwater field settings. This study examined the presence of pharmaceuticals across four tissues (plasma, muscle, brain, and liver) in a wild marine fish, bonefish (Albula vulpes), throughout coastal South Florida, USA. Differential accumulation across tissues was assessed for the number and concentration, identity, and composition of accumulated pharmaceuticals by sampling 25 bonefish and analyzing them for 91 pharmaceuticals. The concentration of pharmaceuticals was highest in plasma > liver > brain > muscle, while the number of pharmaceuticals was highest in liver > brain > plasma > muscle. The identity of detected pharmaceuticals was tissue specific, and there was an inverse relationship between the number of detections for each pharmaceutical and its log Kow. The composition of pharmaceuticals was tissue specific for both pharmaceutical presence/absence and concentration. Across all tissues, the greatest similarity was between brain and liver, which were more similar to plasma than to muscle, and muscle was the most distinct tissue. For tissue compositional variability, muscle was the most diverse in accumulated pharmaceuticals, while plasma, brain, and liver were similarly variable. With the highest concentrations in plasma and highest number in liver, and documented variability in accumulated pharmaceuticals across tissues, our results highlight the importance of tissue selection when surveying exposure in wild fish, suggesting that multi-tissue analysis would allow for a more comprehensive assessment of exposure diversity and risk of adverse effects.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚热带野生海洋鱼类体内药物的不同组织分布
迄今为止,在各种水生系统和生物群中都广泛记录了药物的存在。此外,在从实验室评估药物在鱼类体内的归宿和影响过渡到现场评估暴露和影响方面,已经取得了重大进展;但是,某些研究领域的研究仍然不足。其中,除了在实验室和淡水野外环境中常见的采样物种外,对野生海洋鱼类体内多个内部组织的不同积累情况的调查也是其中之一。本研究检测了美国南佛罗里达州沿海野生海鱼骨鱼(Albula vulpes)体内四种组织(血浆、肌肉、大脑和肝脏)中药物的存在情况。通过对 25 条骨鱼取样并分析其中的 91 种药物,评估了各组织中累积药物的数量、浓度、特性和成分。血浆、肝脏、大脑和肌肉中的药物浓度最高,而肝脏、大脑、血浆和肌肉中的药物数量最多。检测到的药物具有组织特异性,每种药物的检测数量与其辛醇/水分配系数对数值呈反比关系。在药物存在/不存在和浓度方面,药物的组成具有组织特异性。在所有组织中,大脑和肝脏之间的相似性最大,它们与血浆的相似性高于肌肉,而肌肉则是最不同的组织。就组织成分的可变性而言,肌肉中累积的药物种类最多,而血浆、大脑和肝脏的可变性类似。血浆中的药物浓度最高,肝脏中的药物数量最多,各组织中累积药物的差异性也有记载,我们的研究结果凸显了在调查野生鱼类暴露情况时组织选择的重要性,这表明多组织分析可更全面地评估暴露多样性和不良影响风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquatic Toxicology
Aquatic Toxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
250
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Aquatic Toxicology publishes significant contributions that increase the understanding of the impact of harmful substances (including natural and synthetic chemicals) on aquatic organisms and ecosystems. Aquatic Toxicology considers both laboratory and field studies with a focus on marine/ freshwater environments. We strive to attract high quality original scientific papers, critical reviews and expert opinion papers in the following areas: Effects of harmful substances on molecular, cellular, sub-organismal, organismal, population, community, and ecosystem level; Toxic Mechanisms; Genetic disturbances, transgenerational effects, behavioral and adaptive responses; Impacts of harmful substances on structure, function of and services provided by aquatic ecosystems; Mixture toxicity assessment; Statistical approaches to predict exposure to and hazards of contaminants The journal also considers manuscripts in other areas, such as the development of innovative concepts, approaches, and methodologies, which promote the wider application of toxicological datasets to the protection of aquatic environments and inform ecological risk assessments and decision making by relevant authorities.
期刊最新文献
A proof-of-concept multi-tiered Bayesian approach for the integration of physiochemical properties and toxicokinetic time-course data for Daphnia magna Protective role of melatonin against radiation-induced disruptions in behavior rhythm of zebrafish (danio rerio) The long-term effects of norgestrel on the reproductive and thyroid systems in adult zebrafish at environmentally relevant concentrations Fate and effects of an environmentally relevant mixture of microplastics in simple freshwater microcosms The evaluations of oxidative stress and neurotoxicity in threatened endemic fish Barbus meridionalis from Osor River (Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1