Platform integration in ride-sourcing markets with heterogeneous passengers

IF 5.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part B-Methodological Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.trb.2024.103041
Yaqian Zhou , Jintao Ke , Hai Yang , Pengfei Guo
{"title":"Platform integration in ride-sourcing markets with heterogeneous passengers","authors":"Yaqian Zhou ,&nbsp;Jintao Ke ,&nbsp;Hai Yang ,&nbsp;Pengfei Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2024.103041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the impacts of a novel business model termed <em>platform integration</em>, which enables passengers to simultaneously request on-demand rides from multiple ride-sourcing platforms via a third-party integrator. In particular, we employ an equilibrium model where passenger demand and driver supply are endogenously dependent on the prices and wages that emerge from the competitive interaction between two platforms, with and without an integrator. A Hotelling model is adopted to characterize passengers’ heterogeneity in service preference for different platforms. We employ the concepts of a Nash equilibrium and a shared monopoly to analyze equilibrium outcomes that can arise in various settings of demand and supply characteristics with and without platform integration. We find that how the platform should adjust its price and wage at Nash equilibrium as potential demand increases is affected by the nature of supply. We also find that the profit at Nash equilibrium can increase or decrease in supply capacity depending on the competitive situation of the platforms. We build on these equilibrium results to analyze how platform integration affects the platform’s decision-making of price and wage, and market performance. We find that platform integration can increase platform profit but reduce driver income, and may hurt passengers who have a strong preference for one certain platform, especially in the case of a less heterogeneous supply.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 103041"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261524001656","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the impacts of a novel business model termed platform integration, which enables passengers to simultaneously request on-demand rides from multiple ride-sourcing platforms via a third-party integrator. In particular, we employ an equilibrium model where passenger demand and driver supply are endogenously dependent on the prices and wages that emerge from the competitive interaction between two platforms, with and without an integrator. A Hotelling model is adopted to characterize passengers’ heterogeneity in service preference for different platforms. We employ the concepts of a Nash equilibrium and a shared monopoly to analyze equilibrium outcomes that can arise in various settings of demand and supply characteristics with and without platform integration. We find that how the platform should adjust its price and wage at Nash equilibrium as potential demand increases is affected by the nature of supply. We also find that the profit at Nash equilibrium can increase or decrease in supply capacity depending on the competitive situation of the platforms. We build on these equilibrium results to analyze how platform integration affects the platform’s decision-making of price and wage, and market performance. We find that platform integration can increase platform profit but reduce driver income, and may hurt passengers who have a strong preference for one certain platform, especially in the case of a less heterogeneous supply.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异质乘客乘车外包市场的平台整合
本文探讨了一种被称为平台整合的新型商业模式的影响,这种模式使乘客能够通过第三方整合者同时向多个乘车采购平台申请按需乘车服务。具体而言,我们采用了一个均衡模型,在该模型中,乘客需求和司机供给内生依赖于两个平台(有无整合者)之间竞争互动产生的价格和工资。我们采用霍特林模型来描述乘客对不同平台服务偏好的异质性。我们采用纳什均衡和共享垄断的概念,分析了在有平台整合和无平台整合的各种供需特征环境下可能出现的均衡结果。我们发现,随着潜在需求的增加,平台应如何调整纳什均衡时的价格和工资会受到供给性质的影响。我们还发现,纳什均衡时的利润会随着供应能力的增加而增加或减少,这取决于平台的竞争状况。在这些均衡结果的基础上,我们分析了平台整合如何影响平台的价格和工资决策以及市场表现。我们发现,平台整合会增加平台利润,但会减少司机收入,而且可能会伤害到对某一平台有强烈偏好的乘客,尤其是在供应异质性较低的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological
Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
8.80%
发文量
143
审稿时长
14.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Making the most of your private parking slot: Strategy-proof double auctions-enabled staggered sharing schemes Editorial Board Safety, liability, and insurance markets in the age of automated driving Station-based, free-float, or hybrid: An operating mode analysis of a bike-sharing system Formulations and branch-and-cut algorithms for the heterogeneous fleet vehicle routing problem with soft time deadlines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1