Continuity of care and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0144
Eero H Mellanen, Timo Kauppila, Hannu Kautiainen, Mika T Lehto, Ossi Rahkonen, Kaisu H Pitkälä, Merja K Laine
{"title":"Continuity of care and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Eero H Mellanen, Timo Kauppila, Hannu Kautiainen, Mika T Lehto, Ossi Rahkonen, Kaisu H Pitkälä, Merja K Laine","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How continuity of general practitioner care (GP-CoC) affects mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the effect of having no continuity of care (CoC) and GP-CoC on mortality in primary health care (PHC) patients with T2D.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Cohort study in patients aged 60 years or older with T2D within the public PHC of the city of Vantaa, Finland.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Inclusion period was between 2002-2011 and follow-up period between 2011-2018. Six groups were formed (no appointments, one appointment and Modified, Modified Continuity Index [MMCI] quartiles). Mortality was measured with standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). GP-CoC was measured with MMCI. Comorbidity status was determined with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 11,020 patients were included. Mean follow-up time was 7.3 years. SMRs for the six groups (no appointments, one appointment, MMCI quartiles) were 2.46 (95%CI: 2.24-2.71), 3.55 (3.05-4.14), 1.15 (1.06-1.25), 0.97 (0.89-1.06), 0.92 (0.84-1.01) and 1.21 (1.11-1.31), respectively. With continuous MMCI, mortality formed a u-curve. The inflection point was at a MMCI value of 0.65 with corresponding SMR of 0.86. Age and CCI adjusted HR for death between men and women was 1.45 (1.35-1.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with no CoC had the highest mortality. In patients having care over time, the effect of GP-CoC on mortality was minor and mortality turned to rise with high GP-CoC.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: How continuity of general practitioner care (GP-CoC) affects mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is unclear.

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of having no continuity of care (CoC) and GP-CoC on mortality in primary health care (PHC) patients with T2D.

Design & setting: Cohort study in patients aged 60 years or older with T2D within the public PHC of the city of Vantaa, Finland.

Method: Inclusion period was between 2002-2011 and follow-up period between 2011-2018. Six groups were formed (no appointments, one appointment and Modified, Modified Continuity Index [MMCI] quartiles). Mortality was measured with standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). GP-CoC was measured with MMCI. Comorbidity status was determined with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

Results: In total 11,020 patients were included. Mean follow-up time was 7.3 years. SMRs for the six groups (no appointments, one appointment, MMCI quartiles) were 2.46 (95%CI: 2.24-2.71), 3.55 (3.05-4.14), 1.15 (1.06-1.25), 0.97 (0.89-1.06), 0.92 (0.84-1.01) and 1.21 (1.11-1.31), respectively. With continuous MMCI, mortality formed a u-curve. The inflection point was at a MMCI value of 0.65 with corresponding SMR of 0.86. Age and CCI adjusted HR for death between men and women was 1.45 (1.35-1.58).

Conclusions: Patients with no CoC had the highest mortality. In patients having care over time, the effect of GP-CoC on mortality was minor and mortality turned to rise with high GP-CoC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续护理与 2 型糖尿病患者的死亡率。
背景:目的:本研究旨在探讨无持续护理(CoC)和全科医生持续护理(GP-CoC)对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者死亡率的影响:对芬兰万塔市公立初级卫生保健机构中60岁或以上的T2D患者进行队列研究:纳入期为 2002-2011 年,随访期为 2011-2018 年。共分为六组(无预约组、预约一次组和修正组、修正连续性指数[MMCI]四分位组)。死亡率用标准化死亡率(SMR)和调整后危险比(aHR)来衡量。GP-CoC 采用 MMCI 进行测量。合并症状况通过夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)确定:结果:共纳入 11,020 名患者。平均随访时间为 7.3 年。六组(未预约、预约一次、MMCI 四分位数)的 SMR 分别为 2.46(95%CI:2.24-2.71)、3.55(3.05-4.14)、1.15(1.06-1.25)、0.97(0.89-1.06)、0.92(0.84-1.01)和 1.21(1.11-1.31)。在连续的 MMCI 下,死亡率呈 U 型曲线。拐点在 MMCI 值为 0.65 时,相应的 SMR 为 0.86。经年龄和CCI调整后,男性和女性的死亡HR为1.45(1.35-1.58):结论:没有CoC的患者死亡率最高。在长期接受治疗的患者中,全科医生共同核心对死亡率的影响较小,全科医生共同核心越高,死亡率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1