Critical care nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards using ventilator waveform monitoring to detect patient-ventilator asynchrony: A cross-sectional online survey.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13144
Farida Khalil Ibrahim Mohamed, Mohamed Adel Ghoneam, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Mohamed Ezzelregal Abdelgawad
{"title":"Critical care nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards using ventilator waveform monitoring to detect patient-ventilator asynchrony: A cross-sectional online survey.","authors":"Farida Khalil Ibrahim Mohamed, Mohamed Adel Ghoneam, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Mohamed Ezzelregal Abdelgawad","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a condition that commonly affects patients who are mechanically ventilated. PVA happens when the patient's own breathing effort and the ventilator preset settings are out of sync. Ventilator waveform monitoring is viewed as a difficult undertaking, even for experienced practitioners, despite being a non-invasive and reliable tool for diagnosing PVA.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the knowledge levels and attitudes of critical care nurses (CCNs) regarding the use of ventilator waveform monitoring to detect PVA.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in three intensive care units (ICUs) in Alexandria, Egypt. The questionnaire consisted of four parts to evaluate CCNs' level of knowledge and attitude regarding ventilator waveform monitoring and assess their ability to detect PVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 137 CCNs approached, 101 CCNs completed the survey, resulting in a 73.7% response rate. Most nurses (88.1%) demonstrated poor knowledge levels and negative attitudes (93.1%) towards using waveform monitoring to detect PVA. A significant relationship was found between nurses' knowledge of ventilator waveform monitoring and their participation in previous training programmes on mechanical ventilation (MV; p = .031). Additionally, nurses' attitudes towards ventilator waveform monitoring were significantly associated with their level of education (p = .002) and attendance in previous courses on waveform analysis (p = .020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A majority of CCNs have poor knowledge and negative attitudes regarding ventilator waveform monitoring. Previous training in MV and attendance courses on ventilator waveform analysis showed a significant correlation between nurses' level of knowledge and attitudes regarding ventilator waveform monitoring.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Assessment of CCNs' knowledge and attitudes regarding ventilator waveform monitoring for detecting patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) informs the development of future educational programmes, ultimately aiding in the delivery of prompt and high-quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"1580-1590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a condition that commonly affects patients who are mechanically ventilated. PVA happens when the patient's own breathing effort and the ventilator preset settings are out of sync. Ventilator waveform monitoring is viewed as a difficult undertaking, even for experienced practitioners, despite being a non-invasive and reliable tool for diagnosing PVA.

Aim: To assess the knowledge levels and attitudes of critical care nurses (CCNs) regarding the use of ventilator waveform monitoring to detect PVA.

Study design: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in three intensive care units (ICUs) in Alexandria, Egypt. The questionnaire consisted of four parts to evaluate CCNs' level of knowledge and attitude regarding ventilator waveform monitoring and assess their ability to detect PVA.

Results: Of the 137 CCNs approached, 101 CCNs completed the survey, resulting in a 73.7% response rate. Most nurses (88.1%) demonstrated poor knowledge levels and negative attitudes (93.1%) towards using waveform monitoring to detect PVA. A significant relationship was found between nurses' knowledge of ventilator waveform monitoring and their participation in previous training programmes on mechanical ventilation (MV; p = .031). Additionally, nurses' attitudes towards ventilator waveform monitoring were significantly associated with their level of education (p = .002) and attendance in previous courses on waveform analysis (p = .020).

Conclusions: A majority of CCNs have poor knowledge and negative attitudes regarding ventilator waveform monitoring. Previous training in MV and attendance courses on ventilator waveform analysis showed a significant correlation between nurses' level of knowledge and attitudes regarding ventilator waveform monitoring.

Relevance to clinical practice: Assessment of CCNs' knowledge and attitudes regarding ventilator waveform monitoring for detecting patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) informs the development of future educational programmes, ultimately aiding in the delivery of prompt and high-quality care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护护士对使用呼吸机波形监测检测患者与呼吸机不同步的认识和态度:横断面在线调查。
背景:患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)是一种常见的影响机械通气患者的病症。当患者自身的呼吸努力与呼吸机预设设置不同步时,就会出现 PVA。尽管呼吸机波形监测是诊断 PVA 的一种无创、可靠的工具,但即使对于经验丰富的从业人员来说,呼吸机波形监测也被视为一项艰巨的任务。目的:评估重症监护护士(CCN)对使用呼吸机波形监测检测 PVA 的知识水平和态度:研究设计:在埃及亚历山大的三个重症监护病房(ICU)进行了横断面在线调查。调查问卷由四个部分组成,旨在评估CCN对呼吸机波形监测的了解程度和态度,并评估他们检测PVA的能力:在接触的 137 名 CCN 中,101 名完成了调查,回复率为 73.7%。大多数护士(88.1%)对使用波形监测检测 PVA 的知识水平较低,态度消极(93.1%)。研究发现,护士对呼吸机波形监测的了解程度与她们以前参加过的机械通气培训项目(MV;p = .031)之间存在明显关系。此外,护士对呼吸机波形监测的态度与其受教育程度(p = .002)和以前参加过的波形分析课程(p = .020)有明显关系:结论:大多数 CCN 对呼吸机波形监测的认识不足,态度消极。以前接受过的 MV 培训和参加过的呼吸机波形分析课程表明,护士对呼吸机波形监测的知识水平和态度之间存在显著相关性:临床实践相关性:评估护理人员对呼吸机波形监测检测患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)的知识和态度,为未来教育计划的制定提供参考,最终有助于提供及时、优质的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
期刊最新文献
Burnout, collective efficacy and the social network of an intensive care unit. Relationship between ICU nurses' perception of patient safety, caring behaviour, professional self-efficacy and nursing deficits: A multiple mediation analysis. Patients' and family members' dyadic experience of post-operative delirium in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Difference between estimated and actual body weight in an intensive care unit-A service evaluation. Final-year nursing students' placement experiences in a critical care setting: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1