Difference between estimated and actual body weight in an intensive care unit-A service evaluation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13271
Jonas Monsees, Fionnuala Staunton, Aidan Morris, Tracy Grace Sarmiento Paredes, Sneha Sebastian, Tom O'Connor
{"title":"Difference between estimated and actual body weight in an intensive care unit-A service evaluation.","authors":"Jonas Monsees, Fionnuala Staunton, Aidan Morris, Tracy Grace Sarmiento Paredes, Sneha Sebastian, Tom O'Connor","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Actual body weight (ABW) is important for drug dosing and calculating nutritional requirements. The aim of this study is to establish the difference between ABW and estimated body weight in a cohort of ICU patients. Our service evaluation compared 100 patients whose weights were initially estimated by staff, and if able by patients also. Weights were then measured. We also compared ABW to Ideal and Predicted Body Weights. We had a ⟩10% error margin in 36% of estimated weights and a ⟩ 20% error margin in 11% of estimated weights. Median error for patients self-estimating their body weight was 4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74). For patients that were able to estimate their weight the median error margin was 4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74). The Median difference between ABW and Ideal Body Weight was 18.57% (IQR 9.78-36.57) and 18.15% for ABW and Predicted Body Weight (IQR 9.13-36.58). Estimated body weights should only be used when weighing patients is contraindicated. Patients are more accurate at estimating their own body weight than staff. It is best practice to accurately measure body weight in ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 2","pages":"e13271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actual body weight (ABW) is important for drug dosing and calculating nutritional requirements. The aim of this study is to establish the difference between ABW and estimated body weight in a cohort of ICU patients. Our service evaluation compared 100 patients whose weights were initially estimated by staff, and if able by patients also. Weights were then measured. We also compared ABW to Ideal and Predicted Body Weights. We had a ⟩10% error margin in 36% of estimated weights and a ⟩ 20% error margin in 11% of estimated weights. Median error for patients self-estimating their body weight was 4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74). For patients that were able to estimate their weight the median error margin was 4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74). The Median difference between ABW and Ideal Body Weight was 18.57% (IQR 9.78-36.57) and 18.15% for ABW and Predicted Body Weight (IQR 9.13-36.58). Estimated body weights should only be used when weighing patients is contraindicated. Patients are more accurate at estimating their own body weight than staff. It is best practice to accurately measure body weight in ICU patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房a级服务评估中估计体重与实际体重的差异。
实际体重(ABW)对于给药和计算营养需求很重要。本研究的目的是在ICU患者队列中确定ABW和估计体重之间的差异。我们的服务评估比较了100名患者,他们的体重最初是由工作人员估计的,如果病人也能估计的话。然后测量体重。我们还将ABW与理想体重和预测体重进行了比较。我们在36%的估计权重中有10%的误差范围,在11%的估计权重中有20%的误差范围。患者自我估计体重的中位误差为4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74)。对于能够估计体重的患者,中位误差范围为4.14% (IQR 1.39-7.74)。ABW与理想体重的中位差为18.57% (IQR 9.78 ~ 36.57), ABW与预测体重的中位差为18.15% (IQR 9.13 ~ 36.58)。估计体重只能在有禁忌的情况下使用。病人比工作人员更准确地估计自己的体重。准确测量ICU患者体重是最好的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
期刊最新文献
Prevention of Pressure Injuries During Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Newborns: A Non-pharmacological Intervention Trial. Correction to 'Impact of Music Therapy on Patients in the Critical Care Unit: A Qualitative Study'. The Impact of Mindfulness Interventions on the Well-Being of Intensive Care, Emergency Department and Anaesthesia Staff: A Systematic Review. Accuracy and Bias of Pulse Oximetry in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study. Negotiating Time and Spaces: Family Experience of Waiting in the Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1