Soil macrofauna trophic structure and its relationship with soil factors in oases of contrasting cultivation ages

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109277
Yongzhen Wang , Jialong Ren , Wenzhi Zhao , Zhibin He , Longfei Chen , Wei Ren , Jiliang Liu
{"title":"Soil macrofauna trophic structure and its relationship with soil factors in oases of contrasting cultivation ages","authors":"Yongzhen Wang ,&nbsp;Jialong Ren ,&nbsp;Wenzhi Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhibin He ,&nbsp;Longfei Chen ,&nbsp;Wei Ren ,&nbsp;Jiliang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transforming arid and semi-arid deserts into farmlands significantly alters soil moisture and fertility, affecting the trophic structure and functionality of soil fauna. Diversity and function of soil macrofaunal community can accurately reflect changes in soil quality and health during the succession of oasis farmlands. In this study, the assemblage of soil macrofauna and soil environmental factors in cultivated and abandoned croplands in the Zhangye Oasis of Gansu Province, were investigated using a hand-sorting method, and we analyzed the relationship between the trophic structure of soil macrofauna and the soil environment. Our results showed that: 1) Farmland cultivation increased the soil water content, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), while reducing pH. 2) The density, taxon richness, and Shannon-Wiener index of soil macrofauna in cultivated croplands were higher than in abandoned croplands, increasing with cultivation duration. The density of soil macrofauna in 100-year-old farmlands was 2.5, 1.5 and 1.4 times of that in 10-year-old, 30-year-old and 50-year-old farmlands; 3) the density and taxon richness of predatory, phytophagous, and other feeding types of soil macrofauna in cultivated croplands were higher than those of abandoned croplands. The observed increases in density and taxon richness are likely due to the improved soil conditions resulting from cultivation practices. The density-based ratio of predatory to phytophagous and other feeding types of soil macrofauna initially increases then decreases, inversely related to cultivation age. 4) changes in soil environment had little effect on the predatory soil macrofaunal community, and the explained variance by SOC, TP, and pH indicates the significant influence of these soil properties on the composition of the phytophagous soil macrofaunal community. SOC, TP, and pH explained 7.3 % of the variation in phytophagous soil macrofaunal community, while TN, TP, and pH explained 15.4 % of the variation in other feeding types of soil macrofauna. In conclusion, our findings highlight the positive impact of oasis farmland cultivation on soil quality and the enhancement of soil macrofauna diversity, which in turn could contribute to the resilience and productivity of these agricultural ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 109277"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924003955","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transforming arid and semi-arid deserts into farmlands significantly alters soil moisture and fertility, affecting the trophic structure and functionality of soil fauna. Diversity and function of soil macrofaunal community can accurately reflect changes in soil quality and health during the succession of oasis farmlands. In this study, the assemblage of soil macrofauna and soil environmental factors in cultivated and abandoned croplands in the Zhangye Oasis of Gansu Province, were investigated using a hand-sorting method, and we analyzed the relationship between the trophic structure of soil macrofauna and the soil environment. Our results showed that: 1) Farmland cultivation increased the soil water content, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP), while reducing pH. 2) The density, taxon richness, and Shannon-Wiener index of soil macrofauna in cultivated croplands were higher than in abandoned croplands, increasing with cultivation duration. The density of soil macrofauna in 100-year-old farmlands was 2.5, 1.5 and 1.4 times of that in 10-year-old, 30-year-old and 50-year-old farmlands; 3) the density and taxon richness of predatory, phytophagous, and other feeding types of soil macrofauna in cultivated croplands were higher than those of abandoned croplands. The observed increases in density and taxon richness are likely due to the improved soil conditions resulting from cultivation practices. The density-based ratio of predatory to phytophagous and other feeding types of soil macrofauna initially increases then decreases, inversely related to cultivation age. 4) changes in soil environment had little effect on the predatory soil macrofaunal community, and the explained variance by SOC, TP, and pH indicates the significant influence of these soil properties on the composition of the phytophagous soil macrofaunal community. SOC, TP, and pH explained 7.3 % of the variation in phytophagous soil macrofaunal community, while TN, TP, and pH explained 15.4 % of the variation in other feeding types of soil macrofauna. In conclusion, our findings highlight the positive impact of oasis farmland cultivation on soil quality and the enhancement of soil macrofauna diversity, which in turn could contribute to the resilience and productivity of these agricultural ecosystems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同耕作年代绿洲的土壤大型动物营养结构及其与土壤因子的关系
将干旱和半干旱沙漠变为农田会显著改变土壤水分和肥力,影响土壤动物的营养结构和功能。土壤大型动物群落的多样性和功能可以准确反映绿洲农田演替过程中土壤质量和健康状况的变化。本研究采用手工分选法研究了甘肃省张掖绿洲耕地和弃耕地土壤大型底栖动物群落及土壤环境因子,分析了土壤大型底栖动物营养结构与土壤环境的关系。结果表明1)农田耕作增加了土壤含水量、土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)和全磷(TP),同时降低了 pH 值。2)耕地中土壤大型动物的密度、分类群丰富度和香农-维纳指数均高于废弃耕地,且随耕作时间的延长而增加。100 年耕地土壤大型动物的密度分别是 10 年、30 年和 50 年耕地的 2.5 倍、1.5 倍和 1.4 倍;3)耕地土壤大型动物中捕食型、植食型和其他取食型的密度和类群丰富度均高于废弃耕地。观察到的密度和分类群丰富度的增加可能是由于耕作方式改善了土壤条件。土壤大型底栖生物中捕食型与植食型及其他取食型的密度比值先增后减,与耕作年限成反比。4)土壤环境的变化对掠食性土壤大型底栖动物群落的影响很小,SOC、TP 和 pH 的解释方差表明这些土壤特性对植食性土壤大型底栖动物群落的组成有显著影响。SOC、TP和pH解释了植食性土壤大型底栖动物群落变异的7.3%,而TN、TP和pH解释了其他食性土壤大型底栖动物群落变异的15.4%。总之,我们的研究结果凸显了绿洲农田耕作对土壤质量和土壤大型底栖动物多样性的积极影响,这反过来又有助于提高这些农业生态系统的恢复力和生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural land use modulates responses of soil biota and multifunctionality to increased antibiotic pressures Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system Trade-offs and synergies of food-water-land benefits for crop rotation optimization in Northeast China Water and sediment regulation eluting and washland planting lead to nitrogen increase in the lower reaches of the Yellow River
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1