Yi Wang , Valentin H. Klaus , Anna K. Gilgen , Nina Buchmann
{"title":"Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services","authors":"Yi Wang , Valentin H. Klaus , Anna K. Gilgen , Nina Buchmann","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Temperate grasslands provide a broad set of ecosystem services (ES), which include both provisioning ES (e.g., yield production) and non-provisioning ES (e.g., soil carbon sequestration, weed suppression, aesthetics, recreation). Yet, ES can considerably decrease under climate extremes, potentially threatening grassland ES in the future. Meanwhile, some grassland ES were shown to increase with increasing plant diversity. However, whether plant diversity can mitigate the effects of extreme climate events on multiple ES is still unclear, as past studies frequently focused on a single ES, namely aboveground biomass production (AGB). Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the potential mitigation effect of plant species richness against the impact of extreme drought and heat stress on multiple ES in temperate C3 grasslands, by synthesizing existing knowledge and identifying research gaps. Since the 1900s, the number of studies on plant diversity and grassland ES has increased. However, only few studies also addressed climatic extremes, despite a ten-fold increase of studies in the last two decades. Moreover, while all studies included in this review (n=31; 26 biodiversity experiments (sown and weeded), five on-farm studies) addressed provisioning ES (AGB), only 45 % of the studies investigated non-provisioning ES such as climate regulation or weed suppression. No study considered cultural ES. Overall, the positive effect of higher plant species richness on grassland provisioning ES persisted also under extreme conditions, despite reducing absolute magnitudes of ES. Since the number of studies per specific non-provisioning ES was small (n = 2 on average), the general effect of plant species richness acting as insurance against climate extremes for those ES remain largely unknown. In addition, we assessed four different indices commonly used to study biodiversity–ES relationships, but no best index for resistance, recovery, and resilience of ES against climate extremes was found. Overall, the existing evidence reviewed here suggests that maintaining or increasing plant diversity in temperate grasslands can indeed be considered as a natural insurance against current and future climate risks for AGB. However, for any non-provisioning ES, currently available research is too scarce to conclude such a mitigation effect. Closing this research gap, particularly for on-farm settings, could help advance policy and societal support for sustainable, climate change-adapted grassland management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"379 ","pages":"Article 109372"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880924004900","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Temperate grasslands provide a broad set of ecosystem services (ES), which include both provisioning ES (e.g., yield production) and non-provisioning ES (e.g., soil carbon sequestration, weed suppression, aesthetics, recreation). Yet, ES can considerably decrease under climate extremes, potentially threatening grassland ES in the future. Meanwhile, some grassland ES were shown to increase with increasing plant diversity. However, whether plant diversity can mitigate the effects of extreme climate events on multiple ES is still unclear, as past studies frequently focused on a single ES, namely aboveground biomass production (AGB). Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to identify the potential mitigation effect of plant species richness against the impact of extreme drought and heat stress on multiple ES in temperate C3 grasslands, by synthesizing existing knowledge and identifying research gaps. Since the 1900s, the number of studies on plant diversity and grassland ES has increased. However, only few studies also addressed climatic extremes, despite a ten-fold increase of studies in the last two decades. Moreover, while all studies included in this review (n=31; 26 biodiversity experiments (sown and weeded), five on-farm studies) addressed provisioning ES (AGB), only 45 % of the studies investigated non-provisioning ES such as climate regulation or weed suppression. No study considered cultural ES. Overall, the positive effect of higher plant species richness on grassland provisioning ES persisted also under extreme conditions, despite reducing absolute magnitudes of ES. Since the number of studies per specific non-provisioning ES was small (n = 2 on average), the general effect of plant species richness acting as insurance against climate extremes for those ES remain largely unknown. In addition, we assessed four different indices commonly used to study biodiversity–ES relationships, but no best index for resistance, recovery, and resilience of ES against climate extremes was found. Overall, the existing evidence reviewed here suggests that maintaining or increasing plant diversity in temperate grasslands can indeed be considered as a natural insurance against current and future climate risks for AGB. However, for any non-provisioning ES, currently available research is too scarce to conclude such a mitigation effect. Closing this research gap, particularly for on-farm settings, could help advance policy and societal support for sustainable, climate change-adapted grassland management.
温带草地提供广泛的生态系统服务 (ES),其中包括供给型生态系统服务(如产量生产)和非供给型生态系统服务(如土壤固碳、杂草抑制、美学、娱乐)。然而,在极端气候条件下,ES 会大幅减少,从而可能威胁到未来的草地 ES。与此同时,一些草地生态系统随着植物多样性的增加而增加。然而,植物多样性是否能减轻极端气候事件对多种ES的影响仍不清楚,因为以往的研究通常只关注单一的ES,即地上生物量产量(AGB)。因此,我们进行了一项系统性文献综述,通过综合现有知识并找出研究空白,确定植物物种丰富度在温带C3草地上缓解极端干旱和热胁迫对多种生态系统影响的潜在作用。自 20 世纪以来,有关植物多样性和草地生态系统服务的研究越来越多。然而,尽管过去二十年中有关极端气候的研究增加了十倍,但涉及极端气候的研究却寥寥无几。此外,虽然本综述中包含的所有研究(n=31;26 项生物多样性实验(播种和除草),5 项农场研究)都涉及供给性 ES(AGB),但只有 45% 的研究调查了非供给性 ES,如气候调节或杂草抑制。没有一项研究考虑了文化环境。总体而言,植物物种丰富度越高,对草地供给性生态服务的积极影响就越大,在极端条件下也是如此。由于针对特定非供应性 ES 的研究数量较少(平均 n = 2),植物物种丰富度对这些 ES 抵御极端气候的总体影响在很大程度上仍然未知。此外,我们还评估了四种常用于研究生物多样性与 ES 关系的不同指数,但没有找到 ES 抵御、恢复和抵御极端气候的最佳指数。总体而言,本文回顾的现有证据表明,保持或增加温带草地的植物多样性确实可被视为一种天然保险,可抵御当前和未来的亚博体育app下载气候风险。然而,对于任何非供应性生态系统服务而言,目前可用的研究太少,无法得出这种减缓效应的结论。填补这一研究空白,尤其是针对农场环境的研究空白,将有助于推动政策和社会对适应气候变化的可持续草地管理的支持。
期刊介绍:
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.