{"title":"Estimating osteological sex using predictive geometric morphometric analyses of the greater sciatic notch","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurately estimating the biological sex of human skeletal remains is crucial in both forensic and archaeological contexts for constructing biological profiles. Presently, one of the most commonly used methods involves an ordinal scale describing the shape of the greater sciatic notch (GSN). However, this approach is limited by variations influenced by temporal, geographic, and ancestral factors affecting pelvic morphology. Consequently, its reliable applicability is restricted to populations resembling the original reference group. Recent advancements in quantitative analyses offer a promising alternative by enabling detailed measurement of subtle morphological changes, thus enhancing the accuracy of sex estimation using skeletal pelvic remains. In this study, we employ 2D landmark-based geometric morphometrics (GMM) to develop a protocol for pelvic sex estimation by quantifying the curve and angle of the GSN. These techniques are applied to both a contemporary population of adult European-Americans of known biological sexes (33 females, 38 males) and an archaeological population (n = 73) from south-west England. Our analysis reveals that our GMM approach achieves a 90 % accuracy rate in modern populations. Results indicate that both GSN morphology and angle are highly indicative of biological sex, allowing confidence in sex estimations of archaeological remains using these features.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003730/pdfft?md5=15788a672f23b6cdaa0be32f2975ec04&pid=1-s2.0-S2352409X24003730-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurately estimating the biological sex of human skeletal remains is crucial in both forensic and archaeological contexts for constructing biological profiles. Presently, one of the most commonly used methods involves an ordinal scale describing the shape of the greater sciatic notch (GSN). However, this approach is limited by variations influenced by temporal, geographic, and ancestral factors affecting pelvic morphology. Consequently, its reliable applicability is restricted to populations resembling the original reference group. Recent advancements in quantitative analyses offer a promising alternative by enabling detailed measurement of subtle morphological changes, thus enhancing the accuracy of sex estimation using skeletal pelvic remains. In this study, we employ 2D landmark-based geometric morphometrics (GMM) to develop a protocol for pelvic sex estimation by quantifying the curve and angle of the GSN. These techniques are applied to both a contemporary population of adult European-Americans of known biological sexes (33 females, 38 males) and an archaeological population (n = 73) from south-west England. Our analysis reveals that our GMM approach achieves a 90 % accuracy rate in modern populations. Results indicate that both GSN morphology and angle are highly indicative of biological sex, allowing confidence in sex estimations of archaeological remains using these features.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.