Estimating osteological sex using predictive geometric morphometric analyses of the greater sciatic notch

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104745
{"title":"Estimating osteological sex using predictive geometric morphometric analyses of the greater sciatic notch","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accurately estimating the biological sex of human skeletal remains is crucial in both forensic and archaeological contexts for constructing biological profiles. Presently, one of the most commonly used methods involves an ordinal scale describing the shape of the greater sciatic notch (GSN). However, this approach is limited by variations influenced by temporal, geographic, and ancestral factors affecting pelvic morphology. Consequently, its reliable applicability is restricted to populations resembling the original reference group. Recent advancements in quantitative analyses offer a promising alternative by enabling detailed measurement of subtle morphological changes, thus enhancing the accuracy of sex estimation using skeletal pelvic remains. In this study, we employ 2D landmark-based geometric morphometrics (GMM) to develop a protocol for pelvic sex estimation by quantifying the curve and angle of the GSN. These techniques are applied to both a contemporary population of adult European-Americans of known biological sexes (33 females, 38 males) and an archaeological population (n = 73) from south-west England. Our analysis reveals that our GMM approach achieves a 90 % accuracy rate in modern populations. Results indicate that both GSN morphology and angle are highly indicative of biological sex, allowing confidence in sex estimations of archaeological remains using these features.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003730/pdfft?md5=15788a672f23b6cdaa0be32f2975ec04&pid=1-s2.0-S2352409X24003730-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24003730","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately estimating the biological sex of human skeletal remains is crucial in both forensic and archaeological contexts for constructing biological profiles. Presently, one of the most commonly used methods involves an ordinal scale describing the shape of the greater sciatic notch (GSN). However, this approach is limited by variations influenced by temporal, geographic, and ancestral factors affecting pelvic morphology. Consequently, its reliable applicability is restricted to populations resembling the original reference group. Recent advancements in quantitative analyses offer a promising alternative by enabling detailed measurement of subtle morphological changes, thus enhancing the accuracy of sex estimation using skeletal pelvic remains. In this study, we employ 2D landmark-based geometric morphometrics (GMM) to develop a protocol for pelvic sex estimation by quantifying the curve and angle of the GSN. These techniques are applied to both a contemporary population of adult European-Americans of known biological sexes (33 females, 38 males) and an archaeological population (n = 73) from south-west England. Our analysis reveals that our GMM approach achieves a 90 % accuracy rate in modern populations. Results indicate that both GSN morphology and angle are highly indicative of biological sex, allowing confidence in sex estimations of archaeological remains using these features.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用大坐骨切迹的预测性几何形态分析估计骨学性别
在法医学和考古学中,准确估计人类骨骼遗骸的生物性别对于构建生物轮廓至关重要。目前,最常用的方法之一是通过描述坐骨大切迹(GSN)形状的序数标尺。然而,这种方法受到影响骨盆形态的时间、地理和祖先因素的变化的限制。因此,其可靠的适用性仅限于与原始参照组相似的人群。定量分析的最新进展提供了一个很有前途的替代方法,它可以详细测量细微的形态变化,从而提高利用骨骼骨盆遗骸进行性别估计的准确性。在这项研究中,我们采用了基于二维地标的几何形态计量学(GMM),通过量化骨盆网的曲线和角度来制定骨盆性别估计方案。这些技术同时应用于已知生理性别的当代欧美成年人群(33 名女性,38 名男性)和英格兰西南部的考古人群(n = 73)。我们的分析表明,我们的 GMM 方法在现代人群中达到了 90% 的准确率。结果表明,GSN 形态和角度对生物性别有很强的指示作用,因此可以利用这些特征对考古遗存进行性别估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
The precise and accurate dating of medieval bridge remains at Ancrum, Scottish Borders, using stable isotope dendrochronology Challenging the Atacama desert: Agronomic and water conditions for pre-Hispanic maize agriculture in hyper arid environments inferred by δ18O isotopes Scientific analysis on decorative sheet metals of the Spring and Autumn period unearthed from Zaoshulin cemetery, Hubei, China In the search for the origin of the barley at Norse farms in Greenland The impact of the volcanic double event in AD 536 and AD 539/540 on tree-ring growth and felling activity in Danish oak trees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1