Variability in forgoing life-sustaining treatment practices in critically Ill patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a secondary analysis of the EUROBACT-2 international cohort

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05072-1
Hannah Wozniak, Alexis Tabah, Jan J. De Waele, Jean-François Timsit, Niccolò Buetti
{"title":"Variability in forgoing life-sustaining treatment practices in critically Ill patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections: a secondary analysis of the EUROBACT-2 international cohort","authors":"Hannah Wozniak, Alexis Tabah, Jan J. De Waele, Jean-François Timsit, Niccolò Buetti","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05072-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units (ICUs) is influenced by ethical, cultural, and medical factors. This study focuses on a population of patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HABSI) to investigate the association between patient, pathogen, center and country-level factors and these decisions. We analyzed data from the EUROBACT-2 study (June 2019–January 2021) from 265 centers worldwide, focusing on non-COVID-19 patients who died in the hospital or within 28 days after HABSI. We assessed whether death was preceded by a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment, examining country, center, patient, and pathogen variables. To assess the association of each potentially important variable with the decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment, univariable mixed logistic regression models with a random center effect were performed. Among 1589 non-COVID-19 patients, 519 (32.7%) died, with 191 (36.8%) following a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Significant geographical differences were observed, with no reported decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment in African countries and fewer in the Middle East compared to Western Europe, Australia, and Asia. Once a center effect was considered, only health expenditure (Odds ratio 1.79, 95%CI: 1.45–2.21, p < 0.01) and age (Odds ratio 1.02, 95%CI: 1.002–1.05, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment, while other patient and pathogen factors were not. Economic and regional disparities significantly impact end-of-life decision-making in ICUs. Global policies should consider these disparities to ensure equitable end-of-life care practices.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05072-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units (ICUs) is influenced by ethical, cultural, and medical factors. This study focuses on a population of patients with hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HABSI) to investigate the association between patient, pathogen, center and country-level factors and these decisions. We analyzed data from the EUROBACT-2 study (June 2019–January 2021) from 265 centers worldwide, focusing on non-COVID-19 patients who died in the hospital or within 28 days after HABSI. We assessed whether death was preceded by a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment, examining country, center, patient, and pathogen variables. To assess the association of each potentially important variable with the decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment, univariable mixed logistic regression models with a random center effect were performed. Among 1589 non-COVID-19 patients, 519 (32.7%) died, with 191 (36.8%) following a decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Significant geographical differences were observed, with no reported decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment in African countries and fewer in the Middle East compared to Western Europe, Australia, and Asia. Once a center effect was considered, only health expenditure (Odds ratio 1.79, 95%CI: 1.45–2.21, p < 0.01) and age (Odds ratio 1.02, 95%CI: 1.002–1.05, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment, while other patient and pathogen factors were not. Economic and regional disparities significantly impact end-of-life decision-making in ICUs. Global policies should consider these disparities to ensure equitable end-of-life care practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院获得性血流感染重症患者放弃维持生命治疗做法的差异:对 EUROBACT-2 国际队列的二次分析
重症监护病房(ICU)中放弃维持生命治疗的决定受到伦理、文化和医疗因素的影响。本研究以医院获得性血流感染(HABSI)患者为研究对象,探讨患者、病原体、中心和国家级因素与这些决定之间的关联。我们分析了EUROBACT-2研究(2019年6月至2021年1月)中来自全球265个中心的数据,重点关注在医院内或HABSI后28天内死亡的非COVID-19患者。我们评估了患者死亡前是否决定放弃维持生命的治疗,并研究了国家、中心、患者和病原体等变量。为了评估每个潜在重要变量与放弃维持生命治疗的决定之间的关系,我们采用了具有随机中心效应的单变量混合逻辑回归模型。在1589名非COVID-19患者中,有519人(32.7%)死亡,其中191人(36.8%)决定放弃维持生命的治疗。与西欧、澳大利亚和亚洲相比,非洲国家没有关于放弃维持生命治疗的报告,中东地区的报告也较少。一旦考虑到中心效应,只有医疗支出(Odds ratio 1.79,95%CI:1.45-2.21,p < 0.01)和年龄(Odds ratio 1.02,95%CI:1.002-1.05,p = 0.03)与放弃维持生命治疗的决定显著相关,而其他患者和病原体因素则不相关。经济和地区差异极大地影响了重症监护病房的临终决策。全球政策应考虑这些差异,以确保临终关怀实践的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Pressure support, patient effort and tidal volume: a conceptual model for a non linear interaction Commenting on baricitinib versus tocilizumab in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a nationwide cohort study What every intensivist needs to know about mpox Transpulmonary pressure monitoring in critically ill patients: pros and cons—correction of description of the non-invasive PEEP-step method for separation of lung and chest wall mechanics Biochemical analysis of soft tissue infectious fluids and its diagnostic value in necrotizing soft tissue infections: a 5-year cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1