Community involvement in waterway management: Identifying and prioritising community behaviours to protect and enhance Melbourne's waterways

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103877
{"title":"Community involvement in waterway management: Identifying and prioritising community behaviours to protect and enhance Melbourne's waterways","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Biodiversity generally, and freshwater ecosystems specifically, are in decline on a global scale. Human behaviour underlies many threats to waterway health, and decision-makers are increasingly recognising the importance of involving community members in waterway conservation efforts. This research utilised an evidence-based protocol to identify and prioritise behaviours that community members could do to protect and enhance waterways in and around Melbourne, Australia. We identified 31 behaviours that are likely to have the most significant impact on waterway health, and prioritised these behaviours according to current uptake and likelihood of adoption (based on perceived mental effort, financial cost, and time cost). Results highlighted behaviours to target as a first priority – those with high impact / high likelihood / low current uptake – such as reporting pollution, construction site sediment, or stormwater waste to the relevant authority, as well as picking up litter. High priority behaviours that may require more targeted support to encourage adoption – those with high impact / low likelihood / low current uptake – include environmental volunteering, (landholders) installing watering stations in paddocks, and using environmentally friendly cleaning and garden products. Additional research is needed to understand key influences – drivers and barriers – for each behaviour. The findings can usefully inform policies and programs to encourage community participation in waterway conservation behaviours.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002119/pdfft?md5=d039fdbd66f7d8ba188f92794cc1a119&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124002119-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124002119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity generally, and freshwater ecosystems specifically, are in decline on a global scale. Human behaviour underlies many threats to waterway health, and decision-makers are increasingly recognising the importance of involving community members in waterway conservation efforts. This research utilised an evidence-based protocol to identify and prioritise behaviours that community members could do to protect and enhance waterways in and around Melbourne, Australia. We identified 31 behaviours that are likely to have the most significant impact on waterway health, and prioritised these behaviours according to current uptake and likelihood of adoption (based on perceived mental effort, financial cost, and time cost). Results highlighted behaviours to target as a first priority – those with high impact / high likelihood / low current uptake – such as reporting pollution, construction site sediment, or stormwater waste to the relevant authority, as well as picking up litter. High priority behaviours that may require more targeted support to encourage adoption – those with high impact / low likelihood / low current uptake – include environmental volunteering, (landholders) installing watering stations in paddocks, and using environmentally friendly cleaning and garden products. Additional research is needed to understand key influences – drivers and barriers – for each behaviour. The findings can usefully inform policies and programs to encourage community participation in waterway conservation behaviours.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区参与水道管理:确定和优先考虑保护和改善墨尔本水道的社区行为
生物多样性,特别是淡水生态系统,在全球范围内都在衰退。人类行为对水道健康造成了许多威胁,决策者们也越来越认识到让社区成员参与水道保护工作的重要性。这项研究利用循证协议来确定社区成员可以采取哪些行为来保护和改善澳大利亚墨尔本及其周边地区的水道,并对这些行为进行优先排序。我们确定了 31 种可能对水道健康产生最重大影响的行为,并根据目前的采用率和采用的可能性(基于感知的心力、经济成本和时间成本)对这些行为进行了优先排序。结果突出显示了作为首要目标的行为--那些影响大/可能性高/目前采用率低的行为--如向相关部门报告污染、建筑工地沉积物或雨水废物,以及捡拾垃圾。可能需要更有针对性的支持以鼓励采用的优先行为--那些影响大/可能性小/目前采用率低的行为--包括环保志愿服务、(土地所有者)在围场安装饮水站以及使用环保型清洁和园艺产品。要了解每种行为的主要影响因素--驱动因素和障碍,还需要进行更多的研究。研究结果可为鼓励社区参与水道保护行为的政策和计划提供有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
What do you mean 'Climate Change'? An analysis of climate change framings in three climate assemblies Questionable devices: Applying a large language model to deliberate carbon removal Gender-based climate (in)justice: An overview The mandate of “heaven”: How forestland property rights were undermined under the Chinese discourse of Ecological Civilization Carbon data and its requirements in infrastructure-related GHG standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1