Zhenrui Liao, Satoshi Terada, Ivan Georgiev Raikov, Darian Hadjiabadi, Miklos Szoboszlay, Ivan Soltesz, Attila Losonczy
{"title":"Inhibitory plasticity supports replay generalization in the hippocampus","authors":"Zhenrui Liao, Satoshi Terada, Ivan Georgiev Raikov, Darian Hadjiabadi, Miklos Szoboszlay, Ivan Soltesz, Attila Losonczy","doi":"10.1038/s41593-024-01745-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memory consolidation assimilates recent experiences into long-term memory. This process requires the replay of learned sequences, although the content of these sequences remains controversial. Recent work has shown that the statistics of replay deviate from those of experience: stimuli that are experientially salient may be either recruited or suppressed from sharp-wave ripples. In this study, we found that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike-time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using models at three levels of abstraction—leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed and abstract binary—we show that this rule enables efficient generalization, and we make specific predictions about the consequences of intact and perturbed inhibitory dynamics for network dynamics and cognition. Finally, we use optogenetics to artificially implant non-generalizable representations into the network in awake behaving mice, and we find that these representations also accumulate inhibition during sharp-wave ripples, experimentally validating a major prediction of our model. Our work outlines a potential direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, with implications for both normal learning and neurological disease. The study of neural plasticity has focused on excitatory neural connections, but inhibitory connections can also change. Learning at inhibitory synapses may support high-level cognitive phenomena, such as selecting information for memory storage.","PeriodicalId":19076,"journal":{"name":"Nature neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-024-01745-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Memory consolidation assimilates recent experiences into long-term memory. This process requires the replay of learned sequences, although the content of these sequences remains controversial. Recent work has shown that the statistics of replay deviate from those of experience: stimuli that are experientially salient may be either recruited or suppressed from sharp-wave ripples. In this study, we found that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike-time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using models at three levels of abstraction—leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed and abstract binary—we show that this rule enables efficient generalization, and we make specific predictions about the consequences of intact and perturbed inhibitory dynamics for network dynamics and cognition. Finally, we use optogenetics to artificially implant non-generalizable representations into the network in awake behaving mice, and we find that these representations also accumulate inhibition during sharp-wave ripples, experimentally validating a major prediction of our model. Our work outlines a potential direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, with implications for both normal learning and neurological disease. The study of neural plasticity has focused on excitatory neural connections, but inhibitory connections can also change. Learning at inhibitory synapses may support high-level cognitive phenomena, such as selecting information for memory storage.
期刊介绍:
Nature Neuroscience, a multidisciplinary journal, publishes papers of the utmost quality and significance across all realms of neuroscience. The editors welcome contributions spanning molecular, cellular, systems, and cognitive neuroscience, along with psychophysics, computational modeling, and nervous system disorders. While no area is off-limits, studies offering fundamental insights into nervous system function receive priority.
The journal offers high visibility to both readers and authors, fostering interdisciplinary communication and accessibility to a broad audience. It maintains high standards of copy editing and production, rigorous peer review, rapid publication, and operates independently from academic societies and other vested interests.
In addition to primary research, Nature Neuroscience features news and views, reviews, editorials, commentaries, perspectives, book reviews, and correspondence, aiming to serve as the voice of the global neuroscience community.