Age differences in BOLD modulation to task difficulty as a function of amyloid burden.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Cerebral cortex Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhae357
Joseph P Hennessee, Tzu-Chen Lung, Denise C Park, Kristen M Kennedy
{"title":"Age differences in BOLD modulation to task difficulty as a function of amyloid burden.","authors":"Joseph P Hennessee, Tzu-Chen Lung, Denise C Park, Kristen M Kennedy","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhae357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective cognitive performance often requires the allocation of additional neural resources (i.e. blood-oxygen-level-dependent [BOLD] activation) as task demands increase, and this demand-related modulation is affected by amyloid-beta deposition and normal aging. The present study investigated these complex relationships between amyloid, modulation, and cognitive function (i.e. fluid ability). Participants from the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 252, ages 50-89) completed a semantic judgment task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) where the judgments differed in classification difficulty. Amyloid burden was assessed via positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-florbetapir. A quadratic relationship between amyloid standardized value uptake ratios (SUVRs) and BOLD modulation was observed such that modulation was weaker in those with moderately elevated SUVRs (e.g. just reaching amyloid-positivity), whereas those with very high SUVRs (e.g. SUVR > 1.5) showed strong modulation. Greater modulation was related to better fluid ability, and this relationship was strongest in younger participants and those with lower amyloid burden. These results support the theory that effective demand-related modulation contributes to healthy cognitive aging, especially in the transition from middle age to older adulthood, whereas high modulation may be dysfunctional in those with substantial amyloid deposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"34 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective cognitive performance often requires the allocation of additional neural resources (i.e. blood-oxygen-level-dependent [BOLD] activation) as task demands increase, and this demand-related modulation is affected by amyloid-beta deposition and normal aging. The present study investigated these complex relationships between amyloid, modulation, and cognitive function (i.e. fluid ability). Participants from the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study (DLBS, n = 252, ages 50-89) completed a semantic judgment task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) where the judgments differed in classification difficulty. Amyloid burden was assessed via positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-florbetapir. A quadratic relationship between amyloid standardized value uptake ratios (SUVRs) and BOLD modulation was observed such that modulation was weaker in those with moderately elevated SUVRs (e.g. just reaching amyloid-positivity), whereas those with very high SUVRs (e.g. SUVR > 1.5) showed strong modulation. Greater modulation was related to better fluid ability, and this relationship was strongest in younger participants and those with lower amyloid burden. These results support the theory that effective demand-related modulation contributes to healthy cognitive aging, especially in the transition from middle age to older adulthood, whereas high modulation may be dysfunctional in those with substantial amyloid deposition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淀粉样蛋白负荷对任务难度的 BOLD 调制的年龄差异。
随着任务需求的增加,有效的认知表现往往需要分配额外的神经资源(即血氧水平依赖性[BOLD]激活),而这种与需求相关的调节受到淀粉样蛋白-β沉积和正常衰老的影响。本研究调查了淀粉样蛋白、调节和认知功能(即流体能力)之间的复杂关系。达拉斯终生脑研究(DLBS,n = 252,50-89 岁)的参与者在功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)中完成了一项语义判断任务,判断的分类难度各不相同。淀粉样蛋白负荷是通过使用 18F-florbetapir 的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)进行评估的。观察发现,淀粉样蛋白标准化摄取率(SUVRs)与BOLD调制之间存在二次关系,SUVRs中度升高者(如刚刚达到淀粉样蛋白阳性)的调制较弱,而SUVRs非常高者(如SUVR>1.5)则表现出较强的调制。更大的调节与更好的流体能力有关,这种关系在年轻参与者和淀粉样蛋白负荷较低者中最为明显。这些结果支持这样一种理论,即有效的需求相关调节有助于健康的认知老化,尤其是在从中年向老年过渡的过程中,而高调节在有大量淀粉样蛋白沉积的人群中可能会出现功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in functional connectivity during suppression of imagined threat. When emotion and time meet from human and rodent perspectives: a central role for the amygdala? Introspective psychophysics for the study of subjective experience. Examining threat responses through a developmental lens. Causal relationship between cortical structural changes and onset of anxiety disorder: evidence from Mendelian randomization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1