[Maximum levels of vitamins and minerals in fortified food and food supplements in the European Union].

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS Nutricion hospitalaria Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.20960/nh.05403
Antoni García Gabarra
{"title":"[Maximum levels of vitamins and minerals in fortified food and food supplements in the European Union].","authors":"Antoni García Gabarra","doi":"10.20960/nh.05403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Introduction: the European Commission and a Task Force of 7 EU member States, led by Germany and involving Belgium, Spain, France, Greece, Ireland and the Netherlands, have been trying to set maximum levels for vitamin and mineral supplementation in fortified foods and food supplements. After submitting it to all member States for consideration, the Commission will consult the stakeholders. Objectives: to analyze the evolution and current situation on various issues related to this purpose. Methods: evaluation and comments on the applicable EU legislation, evolution of the nutrient reference values in the EU and suggestions for their possible update, compilation on the tolerable upper intake levels in the EU and their recent updates, possible alternatives when there are no tolerable upper intake levels in the EU, and dietary intake surveys carried out in some countries of the EU. Results: analysis of two different models for establishing maximum levels on supplementation in the EU and comparison between both models. Conclusions: are formulated on the two objectives to be achieved in setting the maximum amounts for this supplementation, that is to say, to avoid that the tolerable upper intake levels of some nutrients are exceeded and, at the same time, to correct intake deficits in other nutrients, in order to prevent health risks on population groups; in addition, the updating of the nutrient reference values and their expansion with specific values for children under 3 years old are suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":"1116-1125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.05403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Introduction: the European Commission and a Task Force of 7 EU member States, led by Germany and involving Belgium, Spain, France, Greece, Ireland and the Netherlands, have been trying to set maximum levels for vitamin and mineral supplementation in fortified foods and food supplements. After submitting it to all member States for consideration, the Commission will consult the stakeholders. Objectives: to analyze the evolution and current situation on various issues related to this purpose. Methods: evaluation and comments on the applicable EU legislation, evolution of the nutrient reference values in the EU and suggestions for their possible update, compilation on the tolerable upper intake levels in the EU and their recent updates, possible alternatives when there are no tolerable upper intake levels in the EU, and dietary intake surveys carried out in some countries of the EU. Results: analysis of two different models for establishing maximum levels on supplementation in the EU and comparison between both models. Conclusions: are formulated on the two objectives to be achieved in setting the maximum amounts for this supplementation, that is to say, to avoid that the tolerable upper intake levels of some nutrients are exceeded and, at the same time, to correct intake deficits in other nutrients, in order to prevent health risks on population groups; in addition, the updating of the nutrient reference values and their expansion with specific values for children under 3 years old are suggested.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[欧盟强化食品和食品补充剂中维生素和矿物质的最高含量]。
欧盟委员会和一个由七个欧盟成员国组成的特别工作组(由德国牵头,比利时、西班牙、法国、希腊、爱尔兰和荷兰参与)一直在努力设定强化食品和食品补充剂中维生素和矿物质补充剂的最高含量。在提交所有成员国审议后,欧盟委员会将征求利益相关方的意见。本文分析了与此相关的各种问题的演变和现状:适用的欧盟立法及其评论、欧盟的营养素参考值及其可能的更新、欧盟的最大可容忍摄入量及其最近的更新、欧盟没有最大可容忍摄入量时的替代方案、欧盟的膳食摄入量调查以及确定欧盟补充剂最大摄入量的模式。最后,就确定这种补充剂的最大摄入量所要实现的两个目标得出了一些结论,此外,还建议更新营养素参考值,并扩大其针对 3 岁以下儿童的特定值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
期刊最新文献
[Update on the consensus for hospital coding according to GLIM criteria: an approach adapted to hospital complexity]. Consumption of ultra-processed foods raises the possibility of cardiovascular disease - A meta-analysis. [Maternal perception of hunger-satiety signals and their impact on feeding and nutritional status of infants in Mexico]. [Nutritional risk assessment by STAMP according to type of congenital heart disease in pediatric patients admitted to a reference hospital]. Influence of nutritional risk assessment on the prognosis of trauma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1