Disinformation about diet and nutrition on social networks: a review of the literature.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS Nutricion hospitalaria Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI:10.20960/nh.05533
Sergio Segado Fernández, Beatriz Jiménez Gómez, Pedro Jiménez Hidalgo, María Del Carmen Lozano-Estevan, Iván Herrera Peco
{"title":"Disinformation about diet and nutrition on social networks: a review of the literature.","authors":"Sergio Segado Fernández, Beatriz Jiménez Gómez, Pedro Jiménez Hidalgo, María Del Carmen Lozano-Estevan, Iván Herrera Peco","doi":"10.20960/nh.05533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Background: social networks have become indispensable for global communication, offering unparalleled access to information. However, the lack of content regulation has allowed health and nutrition misinformation to thrive, posing significant public health risks. Objectives: this study aimed to identify the social networks most frequently used for spreading nutrition-related misinformation and evaluate the primary topics, including diseases and dietary claims, featured in these messages. Methods: a systematic review of the literature was conducted, analyzing studies focused on nutrition-related misinformation across platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. Data collection adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and findings were synthesized narratively to address the study objectives. Results: this study analyzed 28 documents focusing on nutrition-related misinformation on social networks. Instagram (50 %) and YouTube (39.28 %) were identified as the most prevalent platforms for spreading such content, followed by TikTok (5.13 %) and Twitter (10.72 %). Over 62 % of the reviewed studies addressed misinformation linked to miracle diets, often associated with orthorexia (14.28 %) and COVID-19 (14.28 %). These diets frequently included unverified claims of rapid health improvements. Notably, credible nutrition content was predominantly shared by healthcare professionals and academic organizations, highlighting their key role in fight against misinformation. Conclusions: misinformation about nutrition on social networks is a growing public health concern. Public health institutions must implement strategies to improve digital literacy and provide tools for assessing information credibility. Healthcare professionals should leverage social media to disseminate evidence-based knowledge, counteracting the influence of unreliable sources. Collaborative efforts are essential to ensure social networks serve as platforms for reliable health promotion and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":"366-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.05533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Background: social networks have become indispensable for global communication, offering unparalleled access to information. However, the lack of content regulation has allowed health and nutrition misinformation to thrive, posing significant public health risks. Objectives: this study aimed to identify the social networks most frequently used for spreading nutrition-related misinformation and evaluate the primary topics, including diseases and dietary claims, featured in these messages. Methods: a systematic review of the literature was conducted, analyzing studies focused on nutrition-related misinformation across platforms such as Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube. Data collection adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and findings were synthesized narratively to address the study objectives. Results: this study analyzed 28 documents focusing on nutrition-related misinformation on social networks. Instagram (50 %) and YouTube (39.28 %) were identified as the most prevalent platforms for spreading such content, followed by TikTok (5.13 %) and Twitter (10.72 %). Over 62 % of the reviewed studies addressed misinformation linked to miracle diets, often associated with orthorexia (14.28 %) and COVID-19 (14.28 %). These diets frequently included unverified claims of rapid health improvements. Notably, credible nutrition content was predominantly shared by healthcare professionals and academic organizations, highlighting their key role in fight against misinformation. Conclusions: misinformation about nutrition on social networks is a growing public health concern. Public health institutions must implement strategies to improve digital literacy and provide tools for assessing information credibility. Healthcare professionals should leverage social media to disseminate evidence-based knowledge, counteracting the influence of unreliable sources. Collaborative efforts are essential to ensure social networks serve as platforms for reliable health promotion and education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交网络上关于饮食和营养的虚假信息:文献综述。
背景:社交网络已经成为全球交流不可或缺的一部分,它提供了无与伦比的信息获取途径。然而,由于缺乏内容监管,健康和营养方面的错误信息泛滥,对公众健康构成重大风险。目的:本研究旨在确定最常用于传播营养相关错误信息的社交网络,并评估这些信息中的主要主题,包括疾病和饮食主张。方法:对文献进行了系统回顾,分析了Twitter、Instagram、TikTok和YouTube等平台上有关营养相关错误信息的研究。数据收集遵循PRISMA指南,并对研究结果进行综合叙述,以解决研究目标。结果:本研究分析了28份关于社交网络上与营养相关的错误信息的文件。Instagram(50%)和YouTube(39.28%)是最流行的传播此类内容的平台,其次是TikTok(5.13%)和Twitter(10.72%)。超过62%的综述研究解决了与神奇饮食相关的错误信息,这些错误信息通常与厌食症(14.28%)和COVID-19(14.28%)有关。这些饮食经常包含未经证实的健康快速改善的说法。值得注意的是,可靠的营养成分主要由医疗保健专业人员和学术组织共享,突出了他们在打击错误信息方面的关键作用。结论:社交网络上关于营养的错误信息日益成为公共卫生问题。公共卫生机构必须实施提高数字素养的战略,并提供评估信息可信度的工具。医疗保健专业人员应利用社交媒体传播基于证据的知识,抵消不可靠来源的影响。协作努力对于确保社会网络成为可靠的健康促进和教育平台至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
期刊最新文献
Can indirect calorimetry and accelerometry be used to assess energy expenditure in healthy and unhealthy population? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of baseline serum vitamin C levels with systemic inflammatory response syndrome in critically ill patients ‒ An observational study. [Declaración de uso de inteligencia artificial: los autores declaran que se utilizó ChatGPT para la corrección y edición del manuscrito.] [Impacto de la dieta mediterránea en la prevención, pronóstico y manejo clínico de los cánceres ginecológicos y de mama: revisión sistemática]. [Relevance of experimental design in generating scientific evidence on health].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1