Students' perception of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in pharmacy school

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102181
Joselyn Knobloch , Kate Cozart , Zachery Halford , Michelle Hilaire , Lisa M. Richter , Jennifer Arnoldi
{"title":"Students' perception of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in pharmacy school","authors":"Joselyn Knobloch ,&nbsp;Kate Cozart ,&nbsp;Zachery Halford ,&nbsp;Michelle Hilaire ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Richter ,&nbsp;Jennifer Arnoldi","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) among college students, particularly in pharmacy education, raises ethical concerns and prompts debates on responsible usage. The promise of the potential to reduce workload is met with concerns of accuracy issues, algorithmic bias, and the lack of AI education and training. This study aims to understand pharmacy students' perspectives on the use of AI in pharmacy education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study used an anonymous 14-question survey distributed among second, third, and fourth-year pharmacy students at four schools of pharmacy in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 171 responses were analyzed. Demographic information included institution, class identification (P2, P3, P4), and age range. Regarding the use of AI, 43% of respondents were unaware of limitations of AI tools. Many respondents (45%) had used AI tools to complete assignments, while 42% considered it academic dishonesty. Fifty-six percent believed AI tools could be used ethically. Student perspectives on AI were varied but many expressed that it will be integral to pharmacy education and future practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the nuances of AI usage among pharmacy students. Despite limited education and training on AI, students utilized tools for various tasks. This survey provides evidence that pharmacy students are exploring the use of AI and would likely benefit from education on using AI as a supplement to critical thinking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 12","pages":"Article 102181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724002132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) among college students, particularly in pharmacy education, raises ethical concerns and prompts debates on responsible usage. The promise of the potential to reduce workload is met with concerns of accuracy issues, algorithmic bias, and the lack of AI education and training. This study aims to understand pharmacy students' perspectives on the use of AI in pharmacy education.

Methods

This study used an anonymous 14-question survey distributed among second, third, and fourth-year pharmacy students at four schools of pharmacy in the United States.

Results

A total of 171 responses were analyzed. Demographic information included institution, class identification (P2, P3, P4), and age range. Regarding the use of AI, 43% of respondents were unaware of limitations of AI tools. Many respondents (45%) had used AI tools to complete assignments, while 42% considered it academic dishonesty. Fifty-six percent believed AI tools could be used ethically. Student perspectives on AI were varied but many expressed that it will be integral to pharmacy education and future practice.

Conclusions

This study highlights the nuances of AI usage among pharmacy students. Despite limited education and training on AI, students utilized tools for various tasks. This survey provides evidence that pharmacy students are exploring the use of AI and would likely benefit from education on using AI as a supplement to critical thinking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生对药学院使用人工智能(AI)的看法
导言大学生中越来越多地采用人工智能(AI),尤其是在药学教育中,这引起了道德方面的关注,并引发了关于负责任地使用人工智能的争论。人工智能有望减少工作量,但同时也存在准确性问题、算法偏差以及缺乏人工智能教育和培训等问题。本研究旨在了解药学专业学生对在药学教育中使用人工智能的看法。研究方法 本研究采用匿名调查的方式,向美国四所药学院的二年级、三年级和四年级药学专业学生发放了一份包含 14 个问题的调查问卷。人口统计学信息包括院校、班级标识(P2、P3、P4)和年龄范围。关于人工智能的使用,43% 的受访者不了解人工智能工具的局限性。许多受访者(45%)曾使用人工智能工具完成作业,42%的受访者认为这是学术不端行为。56%的受访者认为人工智能工具的使用是合乎道德的。学生们对人工智能的看法各不相同,但许多人表示人工智能将成为药学教育和未来实践中不可或缺的一部分。尽管人工智能方面的教育和培训有限,但学生们还是利用工具完成了各种任务。这项调查提供的证据表明,药学专业的学生正在探索如何使用人工智能,并且很可能会受益于将人工智能作为批判性思维补充的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preceptor perspectives on disability-related accommodations in pharmacy experiential education Practice transformation starts in the classroom: Mapping practice change learning in a PharmD program Keeping pace in the age of innovation: The perspective of Dutch pharmaceutical science students on the position of machine learning training in an undergraduate curriculum Live and learn: Utilizing MyDispense to increase student knowledge and confidence in caring for patients with diverse religious backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1