First professional year student Pharmacists' approaches to resolving drug diversion incidents in a community pharmacy simulation

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102318
Joshua Wollen , Aayna Shamsi , Justin Cole Wilder , D'Bria A. Bradshaw , Shantera Rayford Davis
{"title":"First professional year student Pharmacists' approaches to resolving drug diversion incidents in a community pharmacy simulation","authors":"Joshua Wollen ,&nbsp;Aayna Shamsi ,&nbsp;Justin Cole Wilder ,&nbsp;D'Bria A. Bradshaw ,&nbsp;Shantera Rayford Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Drug diversion, the illegal movement or misuse of controlled substances, is a significant public health concern. Pharmacists are crucial in preventing and managing drug diversion but may lack adequate training and confidence in addressing these incidents. This study aimed to evaluate first-year pharmacy students' approaches to resolving drug diversion scenarios using Kings' six models of criminal justice: Medical, Bureaucratic, Status Passage, Power, Due Process, and Crime Control models.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A skills-based role-playing activity was conducted from 2022 to 2024, where students confronted both internal (technician diverting medication) and external (patient with problematic prescriptions) diversion cases. A deductive thematic analysis using a convergent mixed methods approach was completed using reflections from the activity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Reflections from 327 students were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive method, revealing the Bureaucratic model as the most common approach, followed by the Medical, Due Process, Status Passage, and Crime Control models. A “passive approach” theme also emerged, reflecting avoidance of conflict.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights discrepancies between students' public expressions and private reflections, suggesting discordance between societal expectations and personal beliefs in handling drug diversion. The findings suggest a need for enhanced educational strategies to equip future pharmacists with effective approaches to managing drug diversion in practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 5","pages":"Article 102318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Drug diversion, the illegal movement or misuse of controlled substances, is a significant public health concern. Pharmacists are crucial in preventing and managing drug diversion but may lack adequate training and confidence in addressing these incidents. This study aimed to evaluate first-year pharmacy students' approaches to resolving drug diversion scenarios using Kings' six models of criminal justice: Medical, Bureaucratic, Status Passage, Power, Due Process, and Crime Control models.

Methods

A skills-based role-playing activity was conducted from 2022 to 2024, where students confronted both internal (technician diverting medication) and external (patient with problematic prescriptions) diversion cases. A deductive thematic analysis using a convergent mixed methods approach was completed using reflections from the activity.

Results

Reflections from 327 students were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive method, revealing the Bureaucratic model as the most common approach, followed by the Medical, Due Process, Status Passage, and Crime Control models. A “passive approach” theme also emerged, reflecting avoidance of conflict.

Conclusion

This study highlights discrepancies between students' public expressions and private reflections, suggesting discordance between societal expectations and personal beliefs in handling drug diversion. The findings suggest a need for enhanced educational strategies to equip future pharmacists with effective approaches to managing drug diversion in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一年级学生药师在社区药房模拟中解决药品转移事件的方法
药物转移,即非法移动或滥用管制药物,是一个重大的公共卫生问题。药剂师在预防和管理药物转移方面至关重要,但在处理这些事件方面可能缺乏足够的培训和信心。本研究旨在评估药学一年级学生解决药物转移情境的方法,采用king的六个刑事司法模型:医疗模型、官僚模型、身份通道模型、权力模型、正当程序模型和犯罪控制模型。方法采用基于技能的角色扮演活动,在2022 - 2024年期间,让学生面对内部(技术人员转移药物)和外部(处方有问题的患者)转移病例。利用活动的反思,使用收敛混合方法方法完成了演绎主题分析。结果使用Braun和Clarke的自反方法对327名学生的反思进行了主题分析,发现官僚模型是最常见的方法,其次是医学模型、正当程序模型、身份通道模型和犯罪控制模型。“被动做法”的主题也出现了,反映了避免冲突。结论本研究突出了学生在处理毒品转移时的公开表达与私下反思之间的差异,表明社会期望与个人信念之间存在不一致。研究结果表明,需要加强教育策略,使未来的药剂师在实践中有效地管理药物转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
The future of Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. Expanding physical assessment education in pharmacy curricula: A qualitative study to identify and implement high-value skills for clinical practice. Teaching and learning matters: Designing a serious game with adaptive expertise in electrolyte cases. Exploring the association between stress, coping, and sleep in a Midwestern College of Pharmacy Community: A mixed methods study. Retraction notice to "A level of trust: Exploring entrustable professional activities as a feedback tool in a skills lab" [Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 15 (2023) 1034-1039].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1