Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Experience from a Single Tertiary Centre in Spain and ALBI Score as a Survival Prognostic Factor.

María Pilar Ballester, Carlos Abril, Víctor Merino, Manuel Alós, Gloria Segarra, Joan Tosca, Cristina Montón, Nuria Casasus, Paloma Lluch
{"title":"Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Experience from a Single Tertiary Centre in Spain and ALBI Score as a Survival Prognostic Factor.","authors":"María Pilar Ballester, Carlos Abril, Víctor Merino, Manuel Alós, Gloria Segarra, Joan Tosca, Cristina Montón, Nuria Casasus, Paloma Lluch","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atez/bev) has been established as first-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, concerns regarding safety and efficacy have been raised, and no biomarkers to predict response have yet been identified. We aimed to evaluate the real-life experience of atez/bev in a Spanish tertiary hospital and identify factors associated with overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective study of consecutive patients with HCC treated with atez/bev was conducted from December 2020 to December 2022. Efficacy was assessed through OS and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AE). Twenty-three patients were included; 91% were males with a mean of 70 years. Thirteen patients were classified as having BCLC-C.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median treatment duration was 126 days (range=567). Median OS was 381 days (95%CI=205-557) with a cumulative probability of death of 13%, 30%, and 49% at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up, respectively. The only factor associated with OS was the ALBI score (HR=5.03; 95%CI=1.3-19.1), which showed an AUROC of 0.906 (95%CI=0.78-1.00) for the risk of death at 18 months follow up. Median PFS was 141 days (95%CI=110-172). Twenty (86.9%) patients experienced AE, which in nine (39.1%) cases led to the definitive discontinuation of the treatment, four of them (17.4%) due to an AE grade 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The initial experience with atez/bev at our center demonstrated poorer outcomes compared to the original trial (IMbrave150). A careful assessment of the ALBI score may serve as a crucial factor in the selection of systemic treatment for patients with HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atez/bev) has been established as first-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, concerns regarding safety and efficacy have been raised, and no biomarkers to predict response have yet been identified. We aimed to evaluate the real-life experience of atez/bev in a Spanish tertiary hospital and identify factors associated with overall survival (OS).

Patients and methods: A prospective study of consecutive patients with HCC treated with atez/bev was conducted from December 2020 to December 2022. Efficacy was assessed through OS and progression-free survival (PFS), whereas safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AE). Twenty-three patients were included; 91% were males with a mean of 70 years. Thirteen patients were classified as having BCLC-C.

Results: The median treatment duration was 126 days (range=567). Median OS was 381 days (95%CI=205-557) with a cumulative probability of death of 13%, 30%, and 49% at 3, 6 and 12-month follow-up, respectively. The only factor associated with OS was the ALBI score (HR=5.03; 95%CI=1.3-19.1), which showed an AUROC of 0.906 (95%CI=0.78-1.00) for the risk of death at 18 months follow up. Median PFS was 141 days (95%CI=110-172). Twenty (86.9%) patients experienced AE, which in nine (39.1%) cases led to the definitive discontinuation of the treatment, four of them (17.4%) due to an AE grade 5.

Conclusion: The initial experience with atez/bev at our center demonstrated poorer outcomes compared to the original trial (IMbrave150). A careful assessment of the ALBI score may serve as a crucial factor in the selection of systemic treatment for patients with HCC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿特珠单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗无法切除的肝细胞癌:西班牙单个三级中心的实际经验以及作为生存预后因素的 ALBI 评分。
背景/目的:阿替珠单抗/贝伐单抗(atez/bev)已被确定为肝细胞癌(HCC)的一线系统治疗药物。然而,人们对其安全性和疗效表示担忧,而且尚未发现可预测反应的生物标志物。我们旨在评估西班牙一家三级医院使用阿特兹/贝伐的实际经验,并确定与总生存期(OS)相关的因素:2020年12月至2022年12月期间,我们对接受atez/bev治疗的连续HCC患者进行了前瞻性研究。通过OS和无进展生存期(PFS)评估疗效,根据不良事件(AE)评估安全性。该研究共纳入23名患者,其中91%为男性,平均年龄为70岁。13名患者被归类为BCLC-C:中位治疗时间为126天(范围=567)。中位OS为381天(95%CI=205-557),随访3个月、6个月和12个月时的累计死亡概率分别为13%、30%和49%。与OS相关的唯一因素是ALBI评分(HR=5.03;95%CI=1.3-19.1),该评分显示随访18个月时死亡风险的AUROC为0.906(95%CI=0.78-1.00)。中位生存期为141天(95%CI=110-172)。20名(86.9%)患者出现了AE,其中9名(39.1%)患者最终终止了治疗,4名(17.4%)患者的AE为5级:结论:与最初的试验(IMbrave150)相比,我们中心使用atez/bev的初期疗效较差。对 ALBI 评分的仔细评估可作为 HCC 患者选择系统治疗的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Oncotype-DX HER2 Single Gene Score With HER2 Expression Assessed by Immunohistochemistry in HER2-low Breast Cancer. Association of PARP1 Expression Levels and Clinical Parameters in Different Leukemic Subtypes With BCR::ABL1 p190+ Translocation. Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Experience from a Single Tertiary Centre in Spain and ALBI Score as a Survival Prognostic Factor. Caspase 3 Expression Profiles in Meningioma Subtypes Based on Tissue Microarray Analysis. Comparison of Local Recurrence Between LEN-TACE and TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma According to Lipiodol Accumulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1