Partially replacing chemical fertilizer with manure improves soil quality and ecosystem multifunctionality in a tea plantation

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109284
Boheng Liu , Yongli Zhang , Xiaoyun Yi , Haitao Zheng , Kang Ni , Qingxu Ma , Yanjiang Cai , Lifeng Ma , Yuanzhi Shi , Xiangde Yang , Jianyun Ruan
{"title":"Partially replacing chemical fertilizer with manure improves soil quality and ecosystem multifunctionality in a tea plantation","authors":"Boheng Liu ,&nbsp;Yongli Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Yi ,&nbsp;Haitao Zheng ,&nbsp;Kang Ni ,&nbsp;Qingxu Ma ,&nbsp;Yanjiang Cai ,&nbsp;Lifeng Ma ,&nbsp;Yuanzhi Shi ,&nbsp;Xiangde Yang ,&nbsp;Jianyun Ruan","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2024.109284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Substituting chemical fertilizer with organic alternatives has been proven to improve soil fertility and crop yield and mitigate adverse environmental effects. However, the impact of different organic materials, such as animal-sourced organic fertilizer (AOF) and plant-sourced organic fertilizer (POF), on soil quality index (SQI) and ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) in perennial systems like tea plantations remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of partially substituting (30 %) chemical fertilizer with AOF (SM, sheep manure; PM, pig manure; CM, cow manure) and POF (SC, soybean cake) on soil properties, enzyme activity, enzyme stoichiometry, SQI, and EMF in a tea plantation of China. Partial substitution with AOF improved soil pH, total C content, and β-1,4-glucosidase, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase, L-leucine aminopeptidase, and acid phosphatase activities. In contrast, chemical fertilizer alone (CF) and POF substitution reduced these parameters. Compared with the control, CF, and POF, AOF substitution treatments effectively alleviated soil microbial C limitation but increased N limitation. Additionally, all fertilizer treatments enhanced the SQI and EMF of the tea plantation. Among the organic treatments, partial substitution with AOF resulted in the maximum increase in SQI (60 %–134 %) and EMF (157 %–177 %) compared with no fertilization, while POF substitution resulted in a comparatively lower improvement (53 % in SQI and 50 % in EMF). Random forest modeling identified five soil variables and eight enzyme variables as key contributors to the differences in EMF under partial organic substitution. Partial least squares path modeling further revealed that the changes in enzyme properties and microbial metabolic limitations directly influenced EMF in these treatments. Thus, the study proves that partially substituting chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers, especially composted manure, enhances the soil quality and ecosystem functionality of tea plantations. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing effective soil management strategies to improve crop production sustainably.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 109284"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092400402X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substituting chemical fertilizer with organic alternatives has been proven to improve soil fertility and crop yield and mitigate adverse environmental effects. However, the impact of different organic materials, such as animal-sourced organic fertilizer (AOF) and plant-sourced organic fertilizer (POF), on soil quality index (SQI) and ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) in perennial systems like tea plantations remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of partially substituting (30 %) chemical fertilizer with AOF (SM, sheep manure; PM, pig manure; CM, cow manure) and POF (SC, soybean cake) on soil properties, enzyme activity, enzyme stoichiometry, SQI, and EMF in a tea plantation of China. Partial substitution with AOF improved soil pH, total C content, and β-1,4-glucosidase, β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase, L-leucine aminopeptidase, and acid phosphatase activities. In contrast, chemical fertilizer alone (CF) and POF substitution reduced these parameters. Compared with the control, CF, and POF, AOF substitution treatments effectively alleviated soil microbial C limitation but increased N limitation. Additionally, all fertilizer treatments enhanced the SQI and EMF of the tea plantation. Among the organic treatments, partial substitution with AOF resulted in the maximum increase in SQI (60 %–134 %) and EMF (157 %–177 %) compared with no fertilization, while POF substitution resulted in a comparatively lower improvement (53 % in SQI and 50 % in EMF). Random forest modeling identified five soil variables and eight enzyme variables as key contributors to the differences in EMF under partial organic substitution. Partial least squares path modeling further revealed that the changes in enzyme properties and microbial metabolic limitations directly influenced EMF in these treatments. Thus, the study proves that partially substituting chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers, especially composted manure, enhances the soil quality and ecosystem functionality of tea plantations. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing effective soil management strategies to improve crop production sustainably.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用粪肥部分替代化肥可改善茶园的土壤质量和生态系统的多功能性
事实证明,用有机肥替代化肥可以提高土壤肥力和作物产量,并减轻对环境的不利影响。然而,不同的有机材料,如动物源有机肥(AOF)和植物源有机肥(POF),对茶园等多年生系统的土壤质量指数(SQI)和生态系统多功能性(EMF)的影响仍不清楚。本研究评估了在中国的一个茶园中用 AOF(SM,羊粪;PM,猪粪;CM,牛粪)和 POF(SC,豆饼)部分替代化肥(30%)对土壤特性、酶活性、酶的化学计量学、SQI 和 EMF 的影响。用 AOF 部分替代化肥可提高土壤 pH 值、总碳含量、β-1,4-葡萄糖苷酶、β-1,4-N-乙酰葡萄糖苷酶、L-亮氨酸氨肽酶和酸性磷酸酶的活性。相比之下,单施化肥(CF)和 POF 替代则降低了这些参数。与对照、CF 和 POF 相比,AOF 替代处理有效缓解了土壤微生物的 C 限制,但增加了 N 限制。此外,所有肥料处理都提高了茶园的 SQI 和 EMF。在有机肥处理中,与不施肥相比,部分替代 AOF 使 SQI(60%-134%)和 EMF(157%-177%)的提高幅度最大,而替代 POF 则相对较低(SQI 提高 53%,EMF 提高 50%)。随机森林建模确定了 5 个土壤变量和 8 个酶变量,它们是部分有机肥替代情况下造成 EMF 差异的关键因素。偏最小二乘路径建模进一步表明,酶特性和微生物代谢限制的变化直接影响了这些处理中的 EMF。因此,该研究证明,用有机肥(尤其是堆肥)部分替代化肥可提高茶园的土壤质量和生态系统功能。这些发现为制定有效的土壤管理策略提供了科学依据,从而可持续地提高作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural land use modulates responses of soil biota and multifunctionality to increased antibiotic pressures Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system Trade-offs and synergies of food-water-land benefits for crop rotation optimization in Northeast China Water and sediment regulation eluting and washland planting lead to nitrogen increase in the lower reaches of the Yellow River
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1