Why aren't more landowners enrolling in land-based carbon credit exchanges?

Landon R. Schofield , Micayla E. Pearson , Samuel Newell , Nathan Clackum , Benjamin L. Turner
{"title":"Why aren't more landowners enrolling in land-based carbon credit exchanges?","authors":"Landon R. Schofield ,&nbsp;Micayla E. Pearson ,&nbsp;Samuel Newell ,&nbsp;Nathan Clackum ,&nbsp;Benjamin L. Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Increasing concern from both private citizens and intergovernmental organizations about the effects of climate change has led to regulatory and voluntary mechanisms aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including an emerging carbon credit market.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Despite the opportunities for landowners to diversify revenue streams within current operations, there are risks (i.e., production and financial, market, legal-transactional, and social) that could reduce landowner enrollment rates.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>We used a systems thinking approach to map the feedback relationships among landowner decision-making considerations, soil system processes, and carbon credit market incentives.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Our findings illustrate the complex set of constraints of participation in carbon credit programs and how they interact by revealing a limits to growth archetype.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Landowners and crop and livestock producers are uniquely positioned to shape and develop the carbon credit market by filling the gap between equitable transaction participation for both carbon credit buyers and sellers looking to capture value from mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 4","pages":"Pages 117-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000373/pdfft?md5=cce46feab04b7a1601144f3445baa198&pid=1-s2.0-S0190052824000373-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Increasing concern from both private citizens and intergovernmental organizations about the effects of climate change has led to regulatory and voluntary mechanisms aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including an emerging carbon credit market.

  • Despite the opportunities for landowners to diversify revenue streams within current operations, there are risks (i.e., production and financial, market, legal-transactional, and social) that could reduce landowner enrollment rates.

  • We used a systems thinking approach to map the feedback relationships among landowner decision-making considerations, soil system processes, and carbon credit market incentives.

  • Our findings illustrate the complex set of constraints of participation in carbon credit programs and how they interact by revealing a limits to growth archetype.

  • Landowners and crop and livestock producers are uniquely positioned to shape and develop the carbon credit market by filling the gap between equitable transaction participation for both carbon credit buyers and sellers looking to capture value from mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么没有更多的土地所有者加入土地碳汇交易所?
-公民个人和政府间组织对气候变化影响的日益关注导致了旨在减少温室气体排放的监管和自愿机制,包括新兴的碳信用市场、尽管土地所有者有机会在目前的经营中实现收入来源多样化,但也存在一些风险(即生产和金融、市场、法律-交易和社会风险),可能会降低土地所有者的注册率。-土地所有者、农作物和牲畜生产者在塑造和发展碳信用市场方面具有得天独厚的优势,他们填补了碳信用买方和卖方公平参与交易的空白,并希望从减少温室气体排放中获取价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Rangeland management practices in Somaliland: lessons learned from the Aroori Grazing Reserve Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1